World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 131 339 323 207 196 1449 64608
Medicine 137 1908 1779 1082 997 1431 70613

Marina Konopleva publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marina Konopleva between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marina Konopleva published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 48.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 169 publications in 2021. 30 of the 1,443 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 169. Peak 169 publications in 2021. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 6 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 28 publications 2005: 25 publications 2006: 33 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 30 publications 2009: 24 publications 2010: 45 publications 2011: 44 publications 2012: 58 publications 2013: 55 publications 2014: 72 publications 2015: 108 publications 2016: 106 publications 2017: 139 publications 2018: 122 publications 2019: 151 publications 2020: 148 publications 2021: 169 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 30 publications
1996 2025

1,443 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marina Konopleva: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 4
2000 3
2001 1
2002 6
2003 3
2004 28
2005 25
2006 33
2007 26
2008 30
2009 24
2010 45
2011 44
2012 58
2013 55
2014 72
2015 108
2016 106
2017 139
2018 122
2019 151
2020 148
2021 169
2022 11
2023 0
2024 0
2025 30
Total 1,443
Download as CSV

Marina Konopleva publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marina Konopleva sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,421–1,440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,431 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15 1,431
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Marina Konopleva D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marina Konopleva sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 136–137 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 137 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159 137
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Marina Konopleva is affiliated with The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a significant concentration in Hematology, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Oncology.

The scientist's work encompasses a variety of topics, notably in leukemia research and treatment. These include:

  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Research
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • CAR-T Cell Therapy Research
  • Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
  • Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment

Marina Konopleva has contributed to several recent publications, such as:

  • Azacitidine and Venetoclax in Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Acute myeloid leukemia: current progress and future directions, 2021, Blood Cancer Journal
  • 2021 Update on MRD in acute myeloid leukemia: a consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party, 2021, Blood
  • Molecular patterns of response and treatment failure after frontline venetoclax combinations in older patients with AML, 2020, Blood
  • Advances in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: New Drugs and New Challenges, 2020, Cancer Discovery

The most frequent co-authors associated with their work are:

  • Hagop M. Kantarjian
  • Farhad Ravandi
  • Courtney D. DiNardo
  • Elias Jabbour
  • Tapan M. Kadia

Marina Konopleva has published extensively in several key medical journals, including:

  • Blood
  • Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia
  • American Journal of Hematology
  • Blood Advances
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology

Best Publications

  • Azacitidine and Venetoclax in Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    Courtney D DiNardo;Brian A Jonas;Vinod Pullarkat;Michael J Thirman

  • Venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in treatment-naive, elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

    Courtney D. DiNardo;Keith Pratz;Vinod Pullarkat;Brian A. Jonas

  • Targetable Kinase-Activating Lesions in Ph-like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

    K. G. Roberts;Y. Li;D. Payne-Turner;R. C. Harvey

  • Mechanisms of apoptosis sensitivity and resistance to the BH3 mimetic ABT-737 in acute myeloid leukemia

    Marina Konopleva;Rooha Contractor;Twee Tsao;Ismael Samudio

  • Efficacy and Biological Correlates of Response in a Phase II Study of Venetoclax Monotherapy in Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

    Marina Konopleva;Daniel A. Pollyea;Jalaja Potluri;Brenda Chyla

  • An inhibitor of oxidative phosphorylation exploits cancer vulnerability.

    Jennifer R. Molina;Yuting Sun;Marina Protopopova;Sonal Gera

  • Antidiabetic therapies affect risk of pancreatic cancer

    Donghui Li;Sai–Ching J. Yeung;Manal M. Hassan;Marina Konopleva

  • Safety and preliminary efficacy of venetoclax with decitabine or azacitidine in elderly patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukaemia: a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1b study.

    Courtney D DiNardo;Keith W Pratz;Anthony Letai;Brian A Jonas

  • Pharmacologic inhibition of fatty acid oxidation sensitizes human leukemia cells to apoptosis induction

    Ismael Samudio;Romain Harmancey;Michael Fiegl;Hagop Kantarjian

  • Selective BCL-2 Inhibition by ABT-199 Causes On-Target Cell Death in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    Rongqing Pan;Leah J. Hogdal;Juliana M. Benito;Donna Bucci

  • Targeting the leukemia microenvironment by CXCR4 inhibition overcomes resistance to kinase inhibitors and chemotherapy in AML

    Zhihong Zeng;Yue Xi Shi;Ismael J. Samudio;Rui Yu Wang

  • Stromal cells prevent apoptosis of AML cells by up-regulation of anti-apoptotic proteins.

    M Konopleva;S Konoplev;W Hu;AY Zaritskey

  • Acute myeloid leukemia: current progress and future directions.

    Hagop Kantarjian;Tapan Kadia;Courtney DiNardo;Naval Daver

  • Ibrutinib and venetoclax for first-line treatment of CLL

    Nitin Jain;Michael Keating;Philip Thompson;Alessandra Ferrajoli

  • Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a Yields High Rates of Hematologic and Molecular Response in Patients With Advanced Essential Thrombocythemia and Polycythemia Vera

    Alfonso Quintás-Cardama;Hagop Kantarjian;Taghi Manshouri;Rajyalakshmi Luthra

  • 2021 Update Measurable Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: European LeukemiaNet Working Party Consensus Document.

    Michael Heuser;Sylvie D Freeman;Gert J Ossenkoppele;Francesco Buccisano

  • MDM2 antagonists induce p53-dependent apoptosis in AML: implications for leukemia therapy.

    Kensuke Kojima;Marina Konopleva;Marina Konopleva;Ismael J. Samudio;Ismael J. Samudio;Masato Shikami;Masato Shikami

  • PAX5 -driven subtypes of B-progenitor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Zhaohui Gu;Michelle L. Churchman;Kathryn G. Roberts;Ian Moore

  • Phase I/II Study of Combination Therapy With Sorafenib, Idarubicin, and Cytarabine in Younger Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    Farhad Ravandi;Jorge E Cortes;Daniel Jones;Stefan H Faderl

Frequent Co-Authors

Hagop M. Kantarjian
Hagop M. Kantarjian The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Michael Andreeff
Michael Andreeff The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Farhad Ravandi
Farhad Ravandi The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jorge E. Cortes
Jorge E. Cortes Augusta University
Guillermo Garcia-Manero
Guillermo Garcia-Manero The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Elias Jabbour
Elias Jabbour The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Naval Daver
Naval Daver The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Gautam Borthakur
Gautam Borthakur The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Nitin Jain
Nitin Jain The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Sherry Pierce
Sherry Pierce The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a medical career but want flexibility or are looking for alternative entry points, there are many online degree options in healthcare. Online nursing courses are popular for those who wish to obtain foundational skills or specialize in areas such as pediatrics, gerontology, or public health. These programs are especially suitable for balancing study with work or family commitments.

For practicing nurses aiming to advance their qualifications, the rn to bsn online cost is a key consideration, as affordability plays a vital role in choosing the right program. Higher-level roles and academic opportunities often require advanced degrees—online nursing phd programs cater to those interested in research or teaching at the collegiate level.

Additionally, direct entry msn programs online provide a pathway for individuals from different educational backgrounds to enter nursing with a master’s qualification in an accelerated timeframe. These diverse online pathways help make healthcare education more accessible for students across the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Marina Konopleva

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles