World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
34408
World Ranking
5192
National Ranking
2383

Salim Roukos publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Salim Roukos sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 173 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Salim Roukos D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Salim Roukos sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Salim Roukos is affiliated with IBM in the United States and has made contributions primarily to the field of Computer Science, with a particular focus on Artificial Intelligence. Their work spans various subfields including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Molecular Biology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Management Science and Operations Research.

The scientist's research covers several key topics, most notably:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Text Readability and Simplification
  • Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Advanced Graph Neural Networks

Salim Roukos has contributed to a number of publications appearing in various academic venues, with frequent outputs in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
  • Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Recent scholarly works include:

  • "Structure-aware Fine-tuning of Sequence-to-sequence Transformers for Transition-based AMR Parsing" (2021), published in the Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • "A Semantic Parsing and Reasoning-Based Approach to Knowledge Base Question Answering" (2021), featured in the Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "End-to-End QA on COVID-19: Domain Adaptation with Synthetic Training" (2020), available on arXiv
  • "Maximum Bayes Smatch Ensemble Distillation for AMR Parsing" (2022), published in the Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
  • "Multi-Stage Pre-training for Low-Resource Domain Adaptation" (2020), also on arXiv

Collaborative efforts form an important part of their research profile, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Radu Florian
  • Ramón Fernández Astudillo
  • Tahira Naseem
  • Young-Suk Lee
  • Pavan Kapanipathi

Best Publications

  • Bleu: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation

    Kishore Papineni;Salim Roukos;Todd Ward;Wei-Jing Zhu

  • Procedure for quantitatively comparing the syntactic coverage of English grammars

    S. Abney;S. Flickenger;C. Gdaniec;C. Grishman

  • Natural language task-oriented dialog manager and method

    Kishore A. Papineni;Salim Roukos;Robert T. Ward

  • Continuous hidden Markov modeling for speaker-independent word spotting

    J.R. Rohlicek;W. Russell;S. Roukos;H. Gish

  • A Statistical Model for Multilingual Entity Detection and Tracking

    R. Florian;H. Hassan;A. Ittycheriah;H. Jing

  • Phrase splicing and variable substitution using a trainable speech synthesizer

    Robert E. Donovan;Martin Franz;Salim E. Roukos;Jeffrey Sorensen

  • A stochastic segment model for phoneme-based continuous speech recognition

    M. Ostendorf;S. Roukos

  • A Mention-Synchronous Coreference Resolution Algorithm Based On the Bell Tree

    Xiaoqiang Luo;Abe Ittycheriah;Hongyan Jing;Nanda Kambhatla

  • Statistical natural language understanding using hidden clumpings

    M. Epstein;K. Papineni;S. Roukos;T. Ward

  • A maximum entropy model for prepositional phrase attachment

    Adwait Ratnaparkhi;Jeff Reynar;Salim Roukos

  • Challenges in information retrieval and language modeling: report of a workshop held at the center for intelligent information retrieval, University of Massachusetts Amherst, September 2002

    James Allan;Jay Aslam;Nicholas Belkin;Chris Buckley

  • Trigger-based language models: a maximum entropy approach

    R. Lau;R. Rosenfeld;S. Roukos

  • Statistical translation system with features based on phrases or groups of words

    Kishore Ananda Papineni;Salim Estephan Roukos;Robert Todd Ward

  • Active Learning for Statistical Natural Language Parsing

    Min Tang;Xiaoqiang Luo;Salim Roukos

  • A dynamic language model for speech recognition

    F. Jelinek;B. Merialdo;S. Roukos;M. Strauss

  • Performance of the IBM large vocabulary continuous speech recognition system on the ARPA Wall Street Journal task

    L.R. Bahl;S. Balakrishnan-Aiyer;J.R. Bellgarda;M. Franz

  • Building scalable N-gram language models using maximum likelihood maximum entropy N-gram models

    Raymond Lau;Ronald Rosenfeld;Salim Roukos

  • Towards History-based Grammars: Using Richer Models for Probabilistic Parsing

    Ezra Black;Fred Jelinek;John Lafrerty;David M. Magerman

  • IBM's Statistical Question Answering system: TREC-10

    Abraham Ittycheriah;Martin Franz;Salim Roukos

  • Language Model Based Arabic Word Segmentation

    Young-Suk Lee;Kishore Papineni;Salim Roukos;Ossama Emam

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick Jelinek
Frederick Jelinek Johns Hopkins University
Robert Leroy Mercer
Robert Leroy Mercer Renaissance Technologies
Vittorio Castelli
Vittorio Castelli IBM (United States)
John Lafferty
John Lafferty Yale University
Mo Yu
Mo Yu IBM (United States)
Alexander G. Gray
Alexander G. Gray Georgia Institute of Technology
Dimitri Kanevsky
Dimitri Kanevsky Google (United States)
Michael Picheny
Michael Picheny IBM (United States)
Chalapathy Neti
Chalapathy Neti IBM (United States)
Bhuvana Ramabhadran
Bhuvana Ramabhadran Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options is a smart step for anyone considering studying Computer Science in the USA. Whether you’re starting with the basics or aiming for more advanced credentials, there’s a wide range of programs to match your goals and schedule.

For those looking to quickly boost their qualifications, consider some of the shortest masters degree programs available online. These intensive courses can help you enter the workforce or switch careers faster.

Not sure which specialization to pursue? Look into what masters program should I do to see which fields are currently in high demand, especially in tech and computing.

If you’re at the beginning of your educational journey, an associates degree online can provide foundational knowledge and often leads to direct entry-level job opportunities or smooth transfer to bachelor’s programs.

Affordability is also important. Explore the range of affordable online colleges to find quality programs that fit your budget, helping you achieve your career goals without unnecessary debt.

Best Scientists Citing Salim Roukos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles