World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 51 5192 5049 2383 2302 173 34408

Salim Roukos publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Salim Roukos between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Salim Roukos published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 1998. 13 of the 184 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 1998. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 16 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 2 publications
1981 2025

184 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Salim Roukos: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 5
1990 1
1991 2
1992 8
1993 4
1994 4
1995 4
1996 3
1997 13
1998 16
1999 9
2000 4
2001 2
2002 7
2003 6
2004 5
2005 1
2006 1
2007 3
2008 3
2009 3
2010 4
2011 2
2012 2
2013 0
2014 6
2015 0
2016 1
2017 1
2018 0
2019 8
2020 10
2021 13
2022 7
2023 12
2024 11
2025 2
Total 184
Download as CSV

Salim Roukos publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Salim Roukos sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 172–181 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 173 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556 173
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Salim Roukos D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Salim Roukos sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543 51
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Salim Roukos is affiliated with IBM in the United States and has made contributions primarily to the field of Computer Science, with a particular focus on Artificial Intelligence. Their work spans various subfields including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Molecular Biology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Management Science and Operations Research.

The scientist's research covers several key topics, most notably:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Text Readability and Simplification
  • Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Advanced Graph Neural Networks

Salim Roukos has contributed to a number of publications appearing in various academic venues, with frequent outputs in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
  • Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Recent scholarly works include:

  • "Structure-aware Fine-tuning of Sequence-to-sequence Transformers for Transition-based AMR Parsing" (2021), published in the Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • "A Semantic Parsing and Reasoning-Based Approach to Knowledge Base Question Answering" (2021), featured in the Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "End-to-End QA on COVID-19: Domain Adaptation with Synthetic Training" (2020), available on arXiv
  • "Maximum Bayes Smatch Ensemble Distillation for AMR Parsing" (2022), published in the Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
  • "Multi-Stage Pre-training for Low-Resource Domain Adaptation" (2020), also on arXiv

Collaborative efforts form an important part of their research profile, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Radu Florian
  • Ramón Fernández Astudillo
  • Tahira Naseem
  • Young-Suk Lee
  • Pavan Kapanipathi

Best Publications

  • Bleu: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation

    Kishore Papineni;Salim Roukos;Todd Ward;Wei-Jing Zhu

  • Procedure for quantitatively comparing the syntactic coverage of English grammars

    S. Abney;S. Flickenger;C. Gdaniec;C. Grishman

  • Natural language task-oriented dialog manager and method

    Kishore A. Papineni;Salim Roukos;Robert T. Ward

  • Continuous hidden Markov modeling for speaker-independent word spotting

    J.R. Rohlicek;W. Russell;S. Roukos;H. Gish

  • A Statistical Model for Multilingual Entity Detection and Tracking

    R. Florian;H. Hassan;A. Ittycheriah;H. Jing

  • Phrase splicing and variable substitution using a trainable speech synthesizer

    Robert E. Donovan;Martin Franz;Salim E. Roukos;Jeffrey Sorensen

  • A stochastic segment model for phoneme-based continuous speech recognition

    M. Ostendorf;S. Roukos

  • A Mention-Synchronous Coreference Resolution Algorithm Based On the Bell Tree

    Xiaoqiang Luo;Abe Ittycheriah;Hongyan Jing;Nanda Kambhatla

  • Statistical natural language understanding using hidden clumpings

    M. Epstein;K. Papineni;S. Roukos;T. Ward

  • A maximum entropy model for prepositional phrase attachment

    Adwait Ratnaparkhi;Jeff Reynar;Salim Roukos

  • Challenges in information retrieval and language modeling: report of a workshop held at the center for intelligent information retrieval, University of Massachusetts Amherst, September 2002

    James Allan;Jay Aslam;Nicholas Belkin;Chris Buckley

  • Trigger-based language models: a maximum entropy approach

    R. Lau;R. Rosenfeld;S. Roukos

  • Statistical translation system with features based on phrases or groups of words

    Kishore Ananda Papineni;Salim Estephan Roukos;Robert Todd Ward

  • Active Learning for Statistical Natural Language Parsing

    Min Tang;Xiaoqiang Luo;Salim Roukos

  • A dynamic language model for speech recognition

    F. Jelinek;B. Merialdo;S. Roukos;M. Strauss

  • Performance of the IBM large vocabulary continuous speech recognition system on the ARPA Wall Street Journal task

    L.R. Bahl;S. Balakrishnan-Aiyer;J.R. Bellgarda;M. Franz

  • Building scalable N-gram language models using maximum likelihood maximum entropy N-gram models

    Raymond Lau;Ronald Rosenfeld;Salim Roukos

  • Towards History-based Grammars: Using Richer Models for Probabilistic Parsing

    Ezra Black;Fred Jelinek;John Lafrerty;David M. Magerman

  • IBM's Statistical Question Answering system: TREC-10

    Abraham Ittycheriah;Martin Franz;Salim Roukos

  • Language Model Based Arabic Word Segmentation

    Young-Suk Lee;Kishore Papineni;Salim Roukos;Ossama Emam

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick Jelinek
Frederick Jelinek Johns Hopkins University
Robert Leroy Mercer
Robert Leroy Mercer Renaissance Technologies
Vittorio Castelli
Vittorio Castelli IBM (United States)
John Lafferty
John Lafferty Yale University
Mo Yu
Mo Yu IBM (United States)
Alexander G. Gray
Alexander G. Gray Georgia Institute of Technology
Dimitri Kanevsky
Dimitri Kanevsky Google (United States)
Michael Picheny
Michael Picheny IBM (United States)
Chalapathy Neti
Chalapathy Neti IBM (United States)
Bhuvana Ramabhadran
Bhuvana Ramabhadran Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options is a smart step for anyone considering studying Computer Science in the USA. Whether you’re starting with the basics or aiming for more advanced credentials, there’s a wide range of programs to match your goals and schedule.

For those looking to quickly boost their qualifications, consider some of the shortest masters degree programs available online. These intensive courses can help you enter the workforce or switch careers faster.

Not sure which specialization to pursue? Look into what masters program should I do to see which fields are currently in high demand, especially in tech and computing.

If you’re at the beginning of your educational journey, an associates degree online can provide foundational knowledge and often leads to direct entry-level job opportunities or smooth transfer to bachelor’s programs.

Affordability is also important. Explore the range of affordable online colleges to find quality programs that fit your budget, helping you achieve your career goals without unnecessary debt.

Best Scientists Citing Salim Roukos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles