World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
61
Citations
31394
World Ranking
2985
National Ranking
1464

Frederick Jelinek publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick Jelinek sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 153 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Frederick Jelinek D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick Jelinek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frederick Jelinek was a researcher affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their academic contributions focused broadly on scientific inquiry within their institutional setting, although specific details about their fields of study and research topics are not available.

During their career, Frederick Jelinek did not have any recent papers listed, and there are no records of frequent co-authors or recurring publication venues associated with their work.

The available data does not include any book publications by Frederick Jelinek or provide information on the main topics or subfields of their research. Additionally, there are no documented awards or distinctions attributed to them.

Frederick Jelinek is noted to be deceased, which places their body of work in a historical context. Their academic legacy is primarily connected to their affiliation with Johns Hopkins University.

Best Publications

  • Optimal decoding of linear codes for minimizing symbol error rate (Corresp.)

    L. Bahl;J. Cocke;F. Jelinek;J. Raviv

  • Statistical methods for speech recognition

    Frederick Jelinek

  • A statistical approach to machine translation

    Peter F. Brown;John Cocke;Stephen A. Della Pietra;Vincent J. Della Pietra

  • A Maximum Likelihood Approach to Continuous Speech Recognition

    Lalit R. Bahl;Frederick Jelinek;Robert L. Mercer

  • Continuous speech recognition by statistical methods

    F. Jelinek

  • Interpolated estimation of Markov source parameters from sparse data

    F. Jelinek

  • System for parametric text to text language translation

    Peter Fitzhugh Brown;John Cocke;Stephen Andrew Della Pietra;Vincent Joseph Della Pietra

  • Fast sequential decoding algorithm using a stack

    F. Jelinek

  • Procedure for quantitatively comparing the syntactic coverage of English grammars

    S. Abney;S. Flickenger;C. Gdaniec;C. Grishman

  • Self-organized language modeling for speech recognition

    F. Jelinek

  • Design of a linguistic statistical decoder for the recognition of continuous speech

    F. Jelinek;L. Bahl;R. Mercer

  • Perplexity—a measure of the difficulty of speech recognition tasks

    F. Jelinek;R. L. Mercer;L. R. Bahl;J. K. Baker

  • A statistical approach to language translation

    P. Brown;J. Cocke;S. Della Pietra;V. Della Pietra

  • Speech recognition system for natural language translation

    Peter F. Brown;Stephen A. Della Pietra;Vincent J. Della Pietra;Frederick Jelinek

  • Structured language modeling

    Ciprian Chelba;Frederick Jelinek

  • The Development of an Experimental Discrete Dictation Recognizer.

    Frederick Jelinek

  • Basic Methods of Probabilistic Context Free Grammars

    F. Jelinek;J. D. Lafferty;R. L. Mercer

  • Decoding for channels with insertions, deletions, and substitutions with applications to speech recognition

    L. Bahl;F. Jelinek

  • Large vocabulary natural language continuous speech recognition

    L.R. Bahl;R. Bakis;J. Bellegarda;P.F. Brown

  • A dynamic language model for speech recognition

    F. Jelinek;B. Merialdo;S. Roukos;M. Strauss

  • Speech Recognition by Statistical Methods

    Frederick Jelinek

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Leroy Mercer
Robert Leroy Mercer Renaissance Technologies
Lalit R. Bahl
Lalit R. Bahl Renaissance Technologies
Ciprian Chelba
Ciprian Chelba Google (United States)
Salim Roukos
Salim Roukos IBM (United States)
Sanjeev Khudanpur
Sanjeev Khudanpur Johns Hopkins University
John Lafferty
John Lafferty Yale University
David Nahamoo
David Nahamoo Pyron Inc.
Michael Picheny
Michael Picheny IBM (United States)
Mark Dredze
Mark Dredze Johns Hopkins University
William Byrne
William Byrne University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering studying Computer Science in the USA, there are multiple related online degrees and career options to explore. Many students seek practical, flexible programs such as the fastest online degree options to quickly launch their tech careers. These accelerated programs are ideal if you're looking to save time and enter the workforce sooner.

With the growing importance of artificial intelligence, pursuing online AI degree programs opens doors to innovative and high-paying tech roles. Affordability and flexibility make these programs especially appealing for working professionals.

If you’re still deciding which area to focus on, reviewing the best college majors can help you align your studies with in-demand career pathways in technology and beyond. For those considering advanced education, choosing the easiest master degree to get can balance career growth with manageable study requirements.

Online education offers diverse pathways to success—whether you prioritize speed, affordability, or specialized knowledge in fields like AI and Computer Science.

Best Scientists Citing Frederick Jelinek

Recently Published Articles