World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6583 6128 3576 3246 92 11577

Jill Harkavy-Friedman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jill Harkavy-Friedman between 1991 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jill Harkavy-Friedman published across 33 years, from 1991 to 2023, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2012. 1 of the 98 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2012. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 4 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1991 2023

98 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jill Harkavy-Friedman: publications per year, 1991 to 2023
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 3
1994 1
1995 1
1996 1
1997 4
1998 3
1999 1
2000 1
2001 4
2002 3
2003 6
2004 5
2005 1
2006 4
2007 3
2008 3
2009 6
2010 6
2011 6
2012 13
2013 3
2014 3
2015 5
2016 1
2017 3
2018 1
2019 0
2020 1
2021 4
2022 0
2023 1
Total 98
Download as CSV

Jill Harkavy-Friedman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jill Harkavy-Friedman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 92 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 92
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jill Harkavy-Friedman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jill Harkavy-Friedman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jill Harkavy-Friedman is affiliated with the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with particular emphasis on clinical and applied psychology. This work spans several intersecting fields including neurology, sociology and political science, and general health professions.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout

Jill Harkavy-Friedman's published work appears in multiple peer-reviewed venues such as:

  • The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice
  • Journal of Nursing Regulation

Notable recent publications include:

  • "Suicide risk and prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic" (2020) in The Lancet Psychiatry
  • "Consensus Statement on Ethical & Safety Practices for Conducting Digital Monitoring Studies with People at Risk of Suicide and Related Behaviors" (2020) in Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice
  • "Job-Related Problems Prior to Nurse Suicide, 2003-2017: A Mixed Methods Analysis Using Natural Language Processing and Thematic Analysis" (2021) in Journal of Nursing Regulation

Frequent collaborators include:

  • David Gunnell
  • Louis Appleby
  • Ella Arensman
  • Keith Hawton
  • Ann John

The combination of topics and coauthors reflects a multidisciplinary approach to understanding suicide risk factors, ethical considerations in suicide prevention research, and the psychological impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Their work includes analyses using natural language processing and thematic analysis methods, illustrating an integration of qualitative and quantitative research techniques.

Best Publications

  • Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies: Rationale, Unique Features, and Training

    John I. Nurnberger;Mary C. Blehar;Charles A. Kaufmann;Carolyn York-Cooler

  • Suicide risk and prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    David Gunnell;Louis Appleby;Ella Arensman;Keith Hawton

  • Genome Scan Meta-Analysis of Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder, Part II: Schizophrenia

    Cathryn M. Lewis;Douglas F. Levinson;Lesley H. Wise;Lynn E. DeLisi

  • Prenatal rubella, premorbid abnormalities, and adult schizophrenia

    Alan S Brown;Patricia Cohen;Jill Harkavy-Friedman;Vicki Babulas

  • Neuropsychological function and suicidal behavior: attention control, memory and executive dysfunction in suicide attempt

    J. G. Keilp;M. Gorlyn;M. Russell;M. A. Oquendo

  • Genome scan of European-American schizophrenia pedigrees: results of the NIMH Genetics Initiative and Millennium Consortium.

    Stephen V. Faraone;Tara Matise;Dragan Svrakic;John Pepple

  • Suicidal Behavior in Schizophrenia: Characteristics of Individuals Who Had and Had Not Attempted Suicide

    Jill M. Harkavy-Friedman;Kathleen Restifo;Dolores Malaspina;Charles A. Kaufmann

  • Human 5-HT1A receptor C(-1019)G polymorphism and psychopathology.

    Yung-yu Huang;Cristina Battistuzzi;Maria A. Oquendo;Jill Harkavy-Friedman

  • Suicide attempts in schizophrenia: the role of command auditory hallucinations for suicide.

    Jill M. Harkavy-Friedman;David Kimhy;Elizabeth A. Nelson;David F. Venarde

  • Suicidal behaviors in adult psychiatric outpatients, I: Description and prevalence.

    G. M. Asnis;T. A. Friedman;W. C. Sanderson;M. L. Kaplan

  • Visual backward-masking deficits in schizophrenia: relationship to visual pathway function and symptomatology.

    Pamela D Butler;Lara A DeSanti;Jill Maddox;Jill M Harkavy-Friedman

  • Treatment of suicide attempters with bipolar disorder: a randomized clinical trial comparing lithium and valproate in the prevention of suicidal behavior.

    Maria A. Oquendo;Hanga C. Galfalvy;Dianne Currier;Michael F. Grunebaum

  • Childhood trauma and prodromal symptoms among individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis.

    Judy L. Thompson;Meredith Kelly;David Kimhy;Jill M. Harkavy-Friedman

  • Family history of suicidal behavior and early traumatic experiences: Additive effect on suicidality and course of bipolar illness?

    Juan J. Carballo;Jill M. Harkavy-Friedman;Ainsley K. Burke;Leo Sher

  • Are BPI and BPII suicide attempters distinct neuropsychologically

    Jill M. Harkavy-Friedman;John G. Keilp;Michael F. Grunebaum;Leo Sher

  • Depressed patients with co-occurring alcohol use disorders: a unique patient population.

    Leo Sher;Barbara H Stanley;Jill M Harkavy-Friedman;Juan J Carballo

  • Delusions and Suicidality

    Michael F. Grunebaum;Maria A. Oquendo;Jill M. Harkavy-Friedman;Steven P. Ellis

  • Reducing Suicide Risk: Challenges and Opportunities in the Emergency Department

    Marian E. Betz;Matthew Wintersteen;Edwin D. Boudreaux;Gregory Brown

  • Bipolar I and II versus unipolar depression: Clinical differences and impulsivity/aggression traits

    K. Dervic;K. Dervic;M. Garcia-Amador;K. Sudol;P. Freed

  • Suicidal behavior in schizophrenia: a test of the demoralization hypothesis.

    Kathleen Restifo;Jill M. Harkavy-Friedman;Patrick E. Shrout

  • Effect of Exposure to Suicidal Behavior on Suicide Attempt in a High-Risk Sample of Offspring of Depressed Parents

    Ainsley K. Burke;Hanga Galfalvy;Benjamin Everett;Dianne Currier

  • Obsessive compulsive symptoms in individuals at clinical risk for psychosis: Association with depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation

    Jordan E. DeVylder;Amy J. Oh;Shelly Ben-David;Neyra Azimov

  • Relationship of MAO-A promoter (u-VNTR) and COMT (V158M) gene polymorphisms to CSF monoamine metabolites levels in a psychiatric sample of caucasians: A preliminary report.

    Gil Zalsman;Gil Zalsman;Yung-yu Huang;Jill M. Harkavy-Friedman;Maria A. Oquendo

  • Visual form perception: A comparison of individuals at high risk for psychosis, recent onset schizophrenia and chronic schizophrenia

    D. Kimhy;C. Corcoran;J.M. Harkavy-Friedman;B. Ritzler

  • Mental health professionals' experiences reporting suspected child abuse and maltreatment

    Barbara Weinstein;Murray Levine;Nathan Kogan;Jill Harkavy-Friedman

  • Lifelong Course of Positive and Negative Symptoms in Chronically Institutionalized Patients with Schizophrenia

    Branislav Mancevski;John Keilp;Matthew Kurzon;Robert M. Berman

Frequent Co-Authors

Dolores Malaspina
Dolores Malaspina Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Maria A. Oquendo
Maria A. Oquendo University of Pennsylvania
David A. Brent
David A. Brent University of Pittsburgh
Charles B. Nemeroff
Charles B. Nemeroff The University of Texas at Austin
Hanga Galfalvy
Hanga Galfalvy Columbia University
Jordan E. DeVylder
Jordan E. DeVylder Fordham University
Steinar Lorentzen
Steinar Lorentzen University of Oslo
Barbara Stanley
Barbara Stanley Columbia University
Ingrid Melle
Ingrid Melle University of Oslo
Paula J. Clayton
Paula J. Clayton American Foundation for Suicide Prevention

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of online degree programs and career opportunities. Many students are now considering flexible online pathways that allow them to balance work, life, and education. This shift has also made it easier to explore various specializations—including counseling, school psychology, and mental health services—depending on your interests and long-term goals.

Several states are recognized for their strong online counseling programs. For example, you can discover top-ranked counseling degree programs in Georgia—ideal for students interested in community mental health. In Massachusetts, a variety of popular counseling degrees in Massachusetts offer pathways toward school or career counseling. Michigan stands out as well, boasting many popular counseling programs in Michigan that focus on clinical training. New Jersey is another leader, featuring best-ranked counseling degree programs in New Jersey for those seeking excellence in counseling education.

Whether you are planning to work as a licensed counselor, therapist, or in a related psychology field, these online degrees can help you achieve your career goals while offering the flexibility and diversity needed in today's job market.

Best Scientists Citing Jill Harkavy-Friedman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles