World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6202 5764 630 598 140 8207

Peter J. Taylor publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter J. Taylor between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter J. Taylor published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2022. 26 of the 211 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2022. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 8 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 15 publications
1985 2025

211 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter J. Taylor: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 1
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 4
1999 0
2000 1
2001 2
2002 0
2003 2
2004 3
2005 2
2006 1
2007 2
2008 1
2009 1
2010 8
2011 6
2012 5
2013 7
2014 11
2015 17
2016 11
2017 10
2018 4
2019 16
2020 11
2021 20
2022 22
2023 10
2024 11
2025 15
Total 211
Download as CSV

Peter J. Taylor publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 140 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 140
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter J. Taylor D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter J. Taylor is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses on psychology and medicine, with a strong emphasis on clinical psychology, social psychology, psychiatry and mental health, experimental and cognitive psychology, and epidemiology.

The scientist's work encompasses several key topics, including:

  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Peter J. Taylor has contributed extensively to the academic literature with recent papers such as:

  • The Co-occurrence of Self-Harm and Aggression: A Cognitive-Emotional Model of Dual-Harm, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Bisexuality and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI): A narrative synthesis of associated variables and a meta-analysis of risk, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • The interpersonal processes of non-suicidal self-injury: A systematic review and meta-synthesis, 2021, Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
  • The relationship between rumination and NSSI: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, British Journal of Clinical Psychology
  • A systematic review and meta-ethnography to explore people's experiences of psychotherapy for self-harm, 2023, British Journal of Clinical Psychology

The researcher frequently publishes in several venues, including:

  • Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
  • Pilot and Feasibility Studies
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Collaborations feature prominently in their work, with frequent co-authors including Samantha Hartley, Brendan J. Dunlop, Nusrat Husain, Matina Shafti, and Daniel Pratt.

Best Publications

  • A meta-analysis of the prevalence of different functions of non-suicidal self-injury.

    Peter J. Taylor;Khowla Jomar;Katie Dhingra;Rebecca Forrester

  • Resilience to suicidality: the buffering hypothesis.

    Judith Johnson;Alex M Wood;Patricia A Gooding;Peter J Taylor

  • The role of defeat and entrapment in depression, anxiety, and suicide

    Peter J. Taylor;Patricia A. Gooding;Alexander Mathew Wood;Nicholas Tarrier

  • Psychosis, Delusions and the “Jumping to Conclusions” Reasoning Bias: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Robert Dudley;Peter J Taylor;Sophie Wickham;Paul Hutton

  • Association of Psychotic Experiences With Subsequent Risk of Suicidal Ideation, Suicide Attempts, and Suicide Deaths: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Longitudinal Population Studies.

    Kathryn Yates;Ulla Lång;Martin Cederlöf;Fiona Boland

  • Cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    P. Hutton;Peter Taylor

  • Are people at risk of psychosis also at risk of suicide and self-harm? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Peter J Taylor;Paul Hutton;Lisa Wood

  • Changes in attachment representations during psychological therapy

    Peter Taylor;Julia Rietzschel;Adam Danquah;Katherine Berry

  • Defeat and entrapment in schizophrenia: The relationship with suicidal ideation and positive psychotic symptoms

    Peter James Taylor;Patricia A. Gooding;Alex M. Wood;Judith Johnson

  • Resilience to suicidal ideation in psychosis: Positive self-appraisals buffer the impact of hopelessness.

    Judith Johnson;Patricia A Gooding;Alex M Wood;Peter J Taylor

  • A meta-analysis of perceptions of defeat and entrapment in depression, anxiety problems, posttraumatic stress disorder, and suicidality

    Andy P. Siddaway;Peter J. Taylor;Alex M. Wood;Joerg Schulz

  • Perceived social support buffers the impact of PTSD symptoms on suicidal behavior: Implications into suicide resilience research

    M. Panagioti;Patricia A. Gooding;P. J. Taylor;N. Tarrier;N. Tarrier

  • The role of guilt in the development of post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review

    Lauren R. Pugh;Peter J. Taylor;Katherine Berry

  • The Impact of Social Deprivation on Paranoia, Hallucinations, Mania and Depression: The Role of Discrimination Social Support, Stress and Trust

    Sophie Wickham;Peter Taylor;Mark Shevlin;Richard P. Bentall

  • Does the CES-D measure a continuum from depression to happiness? Comparing substantive and artifactual models

    Alex M. Wood;Peter J. Taylor;Stephen Joseph

  • An Examination of Audit Delay: Evidence from Pakistan

    Monirul Alam Hossain;Peter J. Taylor

  • An examination of the relationship between shame, guilt and self-harm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Kate Sheehy;Amna Noureen;Ayesha Khaliq;Katie Dhingra

  • The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale measures a continuum from well-being to depression: Testing two key predictions of positive clinical psychology

    Andy P. Siddaway;Alex M. Wood;Peter J. Taylor

  • A systematic review of adult attachment and social anxiety.

    Ray P.C. Manning;Ray P.C. Manning;Joanne M. Dickson;Joanne M. Dickson;Jasper Palmier-Claus;Alexandra Cunliffe

  • Appraisals and Suicidality: The Mediating Role of Defeat and Entrapment

    Peter James Taylor;Alex M Wood;Patricia Gooding;Nicholas Tarrier

  • Affective variability predicts suicidal ideation in individuals at ultra-high risk of developing psychosis: an experience sampling study.

    J. E. Palmier-Claus;Pamela J. Taylor;Patricia A. Gooding;G. Dunn

  • Self-Esteem and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury in Adulthood: A Systematic Review

    Rebecca L. Forrester;Hayley Slater;Khowla Jomar;Susan Mitzman

Frequent Co-Authors

Alex M. Wood
Alex M. Wood London School of Economics and Political Science
Nicholas Tarrier
Nicholas Tarrier University of Manchester
Patricia A. Gooding
Patricia A. Gooding University of Manchester
Anthony P. Morrison
Anthony P. Morrison University of Manchester
Maria Panagioti
Maria Panagioti University of Manchester
Daniel Pratt
Daniel Pratt University of British Columbia
Katherine Berry
Katherine Berry University of Manchester
Sara Tai
Sara Tai University of Manchester
John Maltby
John Maltby University of Leicester
Stuart D. Carter
Stuart D. Carter University of Liverpool

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of rewarding career pathways. Beyond traditional roles, aspiring professionals can consider becoming school counselors, a field that is evolving with the growing demand for mental health support within educational settings. Many universities now offer flexible online degrees that prepare graduates for these roles, helping them balance studies with other commitments.

When planning your future, it’s crucial to research state-specific requirements. For example, discover how to become a school counselor in Alaska, or explore details about Arizona school counselor certification requirements if you’re aiming to work in the Southwest. Each state sets its own standards for education, supervised experience, and licensure, so it's important to understand these guidelines early in your academic journey.

You can also check state-specific pathways, such as learning how to become a school counselor in Arkansas or reviewing the requirements to be a school counselor in California. By considering online programs and understanding local certification rules, you can design a career plan that aligns with your goals and location.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles