World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8937 8348 903 863 140 5078

Sara Tai publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sara Tai between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sara Tai published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2021. 12 of the 159 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2021. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 6 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 2 publications
2003 2025

159 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sara Tai: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 2
2007 4
2008 8
2009 7
2010 1
2011 6
2012 8
2013 9
2014 6
2015 18
2016 8
2017 11
2018 7
2019 12
2020 6
2021 23
2022 3
2023 5
2024 10
2025 2
Total 159
Download as CSV

Sara Tai publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sara Tai sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 140 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 140
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Sara Tai D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sara Tai sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sara Tai is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to research in psychology, with a focus on clinical applications and mental health services. Their work spans various subfields, including clinical psychology, social psychology, general health professions, philosophy, and psychiatry and mental health.

Their research topics predominantly cover psychiatric care and mental health services, mental health treatment and access, digital mental health interventions, and the dynamics of attachment and relationships. Additional topics include mental health and psychiatry, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, and patient involvement in mental health care.

Sara Tai's recent papers include:

  • The effects of psilocybin on cognitive and emotional functions in healthy participants: Results from a phase 1, randomised, placebo-controlled trial involving simultaneous psilocybin administration and preparation (2022, Journal of Psychopharmacology)
  • Development and Evaluation of a Therapist Training Program for Psilocybin Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression in Clinical Research (2021, Frontiers in Psychiatry)
  • An Artificial Therapist (Manage Your Life Online) to Support the Mental Health of Youth: Co-Design and Case Series (2023, JMIR Human Factors)
  • Agents of change: Understanding the therapeutic processes associated with the helpfulness of therapy for mental health problems with relational agent MYLO (2020, Digital Health)
  • How did mental health become so biomedical? The progressive erosion of social determinants in historical psychiatric admission registers (2020, History of Psychiatry)

Sara Tai frequently collaborates with several researchers in the field, including Warren Mansell, Fritz Handerer, Peter Kinderman, Chris Sutton, and Jasper Palmier-Claus.

The main venues where their research is published include:

  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • British Journal of Guidance and Counselling
  • JMIR Human Factors
  • Journal of Mental Health

Best Publications

  • The interpretation of, and responses to, changes in internal states: An integrative cognitive model of mood swings and bipolar disorders.

    Warren Mansell;Anthony P. Morrison;Graeme Reid;Ian Lowens

  • Conversational Agents in the Treatment of Mental Health Problems: Mixed-Method Systematic Review

    Hannah Gaffney;Warren Mansell;Sara Tai

  • Early detection of bipolar disorder : a pilot familial high-risk study of parents with bipolar disorder and their adolescent children

    Steven Huntley Jones;Sara Tai;Kate Evershed;Rebecca Knowles

  • The Evolution of Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Schizophrenia: Current Practice and Recent Developments

    Sara Tai;Douglas Turkington

  • Stability of self-esteem in bipolar disorder: comparisons among remitted bipolar patients, remitted unipolar patients and healthy controls.

    Rebecca Knowles;Sara Tai;Steven H Jones;Julie Highfield

  • A systematic review of the implementation of recommended psychological interventions for schizophrenia: Rates, barriers, and improvement strategies

    Paul Ince;Gillian Haddock;Sara Tai

  • Coping with depression and vulnerability to mania: A factor analytic study of the Nolen‐Hoeksema (1991) Response Styles Questionnaire

    Rebecca Knowles;Sara Tai;Ian Christensen;Richard Bentall

  • A UK validation of a general measure of subjective well-being: The modified BBC subjective well-being scale (BBC-SWB)

    Eleanor Pontin;Matthias Schwannauer;Sara Tai;Peter Kinderman

  • Predictors of Outcome in Brief Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Schizophrenia

    Alison Brabban;Sara Tai;Douglas Turkington

  • Response styles to depressed mood in bipolar affective disorder.

    Justin Thomas;Rebecca Knowles;Sara Tai;Richard P. Bentall

  • Psychological processes mediate the impact of familial risk, social circumstances and life events on mental health.

    Peter Kinderman;Matthias Schwannauer;Eleanor Pontin;Sara Tai

  • Causal and mediating factors for anxiety, depression and well-being.

    Peter Kinderman;Sara Tai;Eleanor Pontin;Matthias Schwannauer

  • Extreme appraisals of internal states and bipolar symptoms: The Hypomanic Attitudes and Positive Predictions Inventory

    Alyson L. Dodd;Warren Mansell;Anthony P. Morrison;Sara Tai

  • Cognitive therapy for people with a schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis not taking antipsychotic medication: an exploratory trial.

    A. P. Morrison;Paul Hutton;M Wardle;H Spencer

  • The prospective role of defeat and entrapment in depression and anxiety: A 12-month longitudinal study

    Alys Wyn Griffiths;Alex M. Wood;Alex M. Wood;John Maltby;Peter J. Taylor

  • The development and validation of a general measure of well-being: the BBC well-being scale.

    P. Kinderman;M. Schwannauer;E. Pontin;S. Tai

  • Manage Your Life Online: A Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Problem-Solving Intervention in a Student Sample.

    Timothy Bird;Warren Mansell;Jason Wright;Hannah Gaffney

  • The effects of psilocybin on cognitive and emotional functions in healthy participants: Results from a phase 1, randomised, placebo-controlled trial involving simultaneous psilocybin administration and preparation

    Unknown

  • A Transdiagnostic Approach to CBT using Method of Levels Therapy: Distinctive Features

    Warren Mansell;Timothy A. Carey;Sara J. Tai

  • Effective and efficient: Using patient-led appointment scheduling in routine mental health practice in remote Australia.

    Timothy A. Carey;Sara J. Tai;William B. Stiles

  • An experimental test of the role of control in spider fear

    Andrew Healey;Warren Mansell;Sara Tai

  • Qualitative exploration of empowerment from the perspective of young people with psychosis.

    Annmarie Grealish;Sara Tai;Andrew Hunter;Anthony P. Morrison

Frequent Co-Authors

Warren Mansell
Warren Mansell University of Manchester
Richard P. Bentall
Richard P. Bentall University of Sheffield
Anthony P. Morrison
Anthony P. Morrison University of Manchester
Peter Kinderman
Peter Kinderman University of Liverpool
Douglas Turkington
Douglas Turkington Newcastle University
Alex M. Wood
Alex M. Wood London School of Economics and Political Science
Steven Jones
Steven Jones Lancaster University
Peter J. Taylor
Peter J. Taylor University of Manchester
Richard Emsley
Richard Emsley King's College London
Gillian Haddock
Gillian Haddock Manchester Academic Health Science Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens the door to various online educational opportunities and professional pathways. Students often wonder, is an online psychology degree worth it? Accreditation, curriculum quality, and employer recognition are critical factors to consider, but today, many reputable programs offer respected online degrees that meet industry standards.

When selecting a program, it's important to understand the difference between ba and bs psychology. A BA often provides a broader liberal arts foundation, while a BS typically emphasizes scientific research and quantitative skills. Your choice may influence future specialties or graduate study options.

For aspiring specialists, such as those interested in forensic psychology, it’s essential to review forensic psychologist education requirements. These roles usually require advanced degrees, specialized training, and sometimes licensure.

Fast-track degree options are also growing in popularity. Consider exploring a fast track psyd degree online if you want to earn a doctorate and begin your professional practice sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Sara Tai

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles