World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
67
Citations
18791
World Ranking
2186
National Ranking
1098

Jaime Teevan publications per year

2001: 1 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 3 publications
2001 2024

203 publications in total across all disciplines

Jaime Teevan publication distribution in Computer Science in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Jaime Teevan sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 196 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jaime Teevan D-index placement in Computer Science in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Jaime Teevan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - ACM Distinguished Member
  • 2012 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Jaime Teevan is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, primarily focusing on information systems and artificial intelligence. Their research spans a variety of topics, including expert finding and Q&A systems, mobile crowdsensing and crowdsourcing, knowledge management and sharing, advanced causal inference techniques, mental health research topics, topic modeling, and technology adoption and user behaviour.

Their published work includes several highly cited papers. Among these are:

  • The Effects of Remote Work on Collaboration among Information Workers, 2021, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Factors Affecting Response Quantity, Quality, and Speed for Questions Asked Via Social Network Status Messages, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "I Didn't Know I Looked Angry": Characterizing Observed Emotion and Reported Affect at Work, 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • SearchBuddies: Bringing Search Engines into the Conversation, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • A Crowd-Powered Socially Embedded Search Engine, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

Jaime Teevan has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Brent Hecht
  • Longqi Yang
  • Meredith Ringel Morris
  • Mengting Wan
  • Siddharth Suri

Their work frequently appears in notable publication venues such as:

  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining

In terms of fields of study, Jaime Teevan's main domain is computer science, with significant work in subfields such as information systems, artificial intelligence, communication, computer science applications, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their contributions have been recognized with awards such as the ACM Distinguished Member in 2018 and ACM Senior Member in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction

    Saleema Amershi;Dan Weld;Mihaela Vorvoreanu;Adam Fourney

  • Tackling the poor assumptions of naive bayes text classifiers

    Jason D. M. Rennie;Lawrence Shih;Jaime Teevan;David R. Karger

  • Personalizing search via automated analysis of interests and activities

    Jaime Teevan;Susan T. Dumais;Eric Horvitz

  • Implicit feedback for inferring user preference: a bibliography

    Diane Kelly;Jaime Teevan

  • What do people ask their social networks, and why?: a survey study of status message q&a behavior

    Meredith Ringel Morris;Jaime Teevan;Katrina Panovich

  • The perfect search engine is not enough: a study of orienteering behavior in directed search

    Jaime Teevan;Christine Alvarado;Mark S. Ackerman;David R. Karger

  • How Work From Home Affects Collaboration: A Large-Scale Study of Information Workers in a Natural Experiment During COVID-19

    Longqi Yang;Sonia Jaffe;David Holtz;Siddharth Suri

  • System, method and interface to provide personalized retrieval and information access

    J Horvitz Erik;Brook Steven Jaime;T Dumais Susan;ジェー.ホルビッツ エリック

  • #TwitterSearch: a comparison of microblog search and web search

    Jaime Teevan;Daniel Ramage;Merredith Ringel Morris

  • Characterizing the influence of domain expertise on web search behavior

    Ryen W. White;Susan T. Dumais;Jaime Teevan

  • Information re-retrieval: repeat queries in Yahoo's logs

    Jaime Teevan;Eytan Adar;Rosie Jones;Michael A. S. Potts

  • To personalize or not to personalize: modeling queries with variation in user intent

    Jaime Teevan;Susan T. Dumais;Daniel J. Liebling

  • Large scale analysis of web revisitation patterns

    Eytan Adar;Jaime Teevan;Susan T. Dumais

  • Personal Information Management

    Jaime Teevan;William Jones

  • Relating web page change with revisitation patterns

    Eytan Adar;Jaime B. Teevan;Susan T. Dumais;Daniel J. Liebling

  • A Comparison of Information Seeking Using Search Engines and Social Networks

    Meredith Ringel Morris;Jaime Teevan;Katrina Panovich

  • Visual snippets: summarizing web pages for search and revisitation

    Jaime Teevan;Edward Cutrell;Danyel Fisher;Steven M. Drucker

  • Discovery is never by chance: designing for (un)serendipity

    Paul André;m.c. schraefel;Jaime Teevan;Susan T. Dumais

  • The web changes everything: understanding the dynamics of web content

    Eytan Adar;Jaime Teevan;Susan T. Dumais;Jonathan L. Elsas

  • Searching to eliminate personal information management

    Edward Cutrell;Susan T. Dumais;Jaime Teevan

  • Potential for personalization

    Jaime Teevan;Susan T. Dumais;Eric Horvitz

  • Modeling and analysis of cross-session search tasks

    Alexander Kotov;Paul N. Bennett;Ryen W. White;Susan T. Dumais

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan T. Dumais
Susan T. Dumais Microsoft (United States)
Meredith Ringel Morris
Meredith Ringel Morris Google (United States)
Shamsi T. Iqbal
Shamsi T. Iqbal Microsoft (United States)
Eric Horvitz
Eric Horvitz Microsoft (United States)
Ryen W. White
Ryen W. White Microsoft (United States)
Eytan Adar
Eytan Adar University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Brent Hecht
Brent Hecht Northwestern University
Krysta M. Svore
Krysta M. Svore Microsoft (United States)
Michael S. Bernstein
Michael S. Bernstein Stanford University
Kevyn Collins-Thompson
Kevyn Collins-Thompson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying computer science in the USA opens doors to a wide variety of online degrees and career options. As technology reshapes industries, pursuing specialized education can give you a competitive advantage in the job market.

For those interested in digital security, online cybersecurity degree programs provide critical skills for protecting data and networks. If you are drawn to building projects and site management, consider construction management courses that align with technology-driven infrastructure work.

A background in computer science also complements a criminal justice degree, especially with the rise of cybercrime and digital evidence. Likewise, if you are detail-oriented and interested in financial technology, online accounting degrees offer pathways to careers in auditing, analysis, and management accounting.

Exploring these related online degrees can diversify your skill set and prepare you for emerging career opportunities in today's tech-focused world.

Best Scientists Citing Jaime Teevan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles