World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
39
Citations
5341
World Ranking
1306
National Ranking
383

Rick Stock publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rick Stock sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 135 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

Rick Stock D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rick Stock sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rick Stock is affiliated with the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on areas that intersect animal science with crop science, specifically addressing ruminant nutrition, digestive physiology, and meat and animal product quality.

Stock's recent publications reflect active engagement in animal nutrition research, with studies published mainly in well-known journals such as the Journal of Animal Science and Translational Animal Science. Key published works include:

  • Interaction of Sweet Bran inclusion and corn processing method in beef finishing diets (2024), Translational Animal Science
  • 77 Evaluation of Models Used to Predict Dry Matter Intake in Forage-Based Diets (2021), Journal of Animal Science
  • 199 Characterizing Digestion Traits of Corn Bran Products from Corn Wet Milling (2022), Journal of Animal Science
  • 196 Interaction of Corn Processing Method and Sweet Bran Inclusion in Finishing Diets (2022), Journal of Animal Science
  • 344 Impact of Removing 20% Distillers Grains After one-Third or two-Thirds of the Feeding Period on Performance of Finishing Yearlings (2022), Journal of Animal Science

Their core research topics cover:

  • Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Meat and Animal Product Quality

Within the broader disciplinary framework, Stock's work spans the subfields of:

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Stock regularly publishes in these venues:

  • Journal of Animal Science
  • Translational Animal Science

The scientist collaborates frequently with other researchers, indicating active participation in multidisciplinary teams. Notable frequent co-authors include:

  • Galen E. Erickson
  • J. C. MacDonald
  • Rebecca L McDermott
  • Mitch M Norman
  • Braden Troyer

Best Publications

  • Wet corn distillers byproducts compared with dried corn distillers grains with solubles as a source of protein and energy for ruminants.

    G. A. Ham;R. A. Stock;T. J. Klopfenstein;E. M. Larson

  • Severity of liver abscesses and efficiency of feed utilization of feedlot cattle.

    D. R. Brink;S. R. Lowry;R. A. Stock;J. C. Parrott

  • Feeding value of wet distillers byproducts for finishing ruminants.

    E. M. Larson;R. A. Stock;T. J. Klopfenstein;M. H. Sindt

  • Review of new information on the use of wet and dry milling feed by-products in feedlot diets

    Rick Stock;J. M. Lewis;Terry J. Klopfenstein;C. T. Milton

  • Influence of ruminal protozoa on site and extent of starch digestion and ruminal fermentation.

    G. D. Mendoza;R. A. Britton;R. A. Stock

  • Effects of grain type, roughage level and monensin level on finishing cattle performance.

    R. A. Stock;M. H. Sindt;J. C. Parrott;F. K. Goedeken

  • Net portal absorption of lactate and volatile fatty acids in steers experiencing glucose-induced acidosis or fed a 70% concentrate diet ad libitum.

    D. L. Harmon;D. L. Harmon;R. A. Britton;R. A. Britton;R. L. Prior;R. L. Prior;R. A. Stock;R. A. Stock

  • Effect of monensin and monensin and tylosin combination on feed intake variation of feedlot steers.

    R A Stock;S B Laudert;W W Stroup;E M Larson

  • Evaluation of nitrogen and organic matter balance in the feedlot as affected by level and source of dietary fiber.

    S. Bierman;Galen Erickson;Terry Klopfenstein;Rick A. Stock

  • Evaluation of corn and sorghum distillers byproducts.

    S L Lodge;R A Stock;T J Klopfenstein;D H Shain

  • Effects of imposed feed intake variation on acidosis and performance of finishing steers.

    R. J. Cooper;Terry J. Klopfenstein;Rick Stock;C. T. Milton

  • Feeding wet corn gluten feed to reduce subacute acidosis in cattle.

    C R Krehbiel;R A Stock;D W Herold;D H Shain

  • Impact of weighing procedures and variation in protein degradation rate on measured performance of growing lambs and cattle.

    Rick Stock;Terry Klopfenstein;Dennis Brink;Steve Lowry

  • Feeding Combinations of High Moisture Corn and Dry-Rolled Grain Sorghum to Finishing Steers

    R. A. Stock;D. R. Brink;R. A. Britton;F. K. Goedeken

  • Effect of degradable intake protein level on finishing cattle performance and ruminal metabolism.

    D. H. Shain;Rick Stock;Terry J. Klopfenstein;D. W. Herold

  • Feeding Value of Slowly Degraded Proteins

    Rick Stock;Neal Merchen;Terry Klopfenstein;Mary Poos

  • Metabolizable protein and amino acid requirements of growing cattle.

    V. A. Wilkerson;T. J. Klopfenstein;R. A. Britton;R. A. Stock

  • Effect of protein source and grain type on finishing calf performance and ruminal metabolism.

    M H Sindt;R A Stock;T J Klopfenstein;D H Shain

  • The effect of forage source and particle size on finishing yearling steer performance and ruminal metabolism.

    D. H. Shain;Rick Stock;Terry J. Klopfenstein;D. W. Herold

  • In vitro starch disappearance procedure modifications

    C. J. Richards;Jeffrey F. Pedersen;R. A. Britton;R. A. Stock

  • High-moisture corn utilization in finishing cattle.

    R A Stock;M H Sindt;R M Cleale;R A Britton

  • Protein value of feather meal for ruminants as affected by blood additions

    F. K. Goedeken;T. J. Klopfenstein;R. A. Stock;R. A. Britton

  • Maximal replacement of forage and concentrate with a new wet corn milling product for lactating dairy cows.

    K. Boddugari;R.J. Grant;R. Stock;M. Lewis

  • Feeding Combinations of High Moisture Corn and Dry Corn to Finishing Cattle1

    R. A. Stock;D. R. Brink;R. T. Brandt;J. K. Merrill

  • Effect of grain sorghum hybrid on in vitro rate of starch disappearance and finishing performance of ruminants.

    T. J. Wester;S. M. Gramlich;R. A. Britton;R. A. Stock

  • Determining the net energy value of wet and dry corn gluten feed in beef growing and finishing diets.

    G A Ham;R A Stock;T J Klopfenstein;R P Huffman

  • Corn processing method in finishing diets containing wet corn gluten feed.

    T. L. Scott;C. T. Milton;Galen Erickson;Terry Klopfenstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Terry J. Klopfenstein
Terry J. Klopfenstein University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Galen E. Erickson
Galen E. Erickson University of Nebraska–Lincoln
R. A. Britton
R. A. Britton University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Terry L. Mader
Terry L. Mader University of Nebraska–Lincoln
James S. Drouillard
James S. Drouillard Kansas State University
Marc L. Bauer
Marc L. Bauer North Dakota State University
Barry J. Bradford
Barry J. Bradford Michigan State University
R.J. Grant
R.J. Grant William H Miner Agricultural Research Institute
Chris R. Calkins
Chris R. Calkins University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Austin Lewis
Austin Lewis University of Nebraska–Lincoln

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Animal Science and Veterinary fields, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Programs like those offered by bacb accredited schools provide specialized training in behavior analysis, which can be useful for working with animal behavior or therapeutic contexts.

Similarly, pursuing education in human psychology through nasp approved online school psychology programs offers insights into cognitive and emotional development. This knowledge complements animal science studies, particularly in human-animal interaction and welfare.

Many aspiring professionals also consider mental health pathways. Online programs like online psyd programs accredited make earning a clinical doctorate in psychology more accessible, enhancing qualifications for roles involving animal-assisted therapy or counseling.

Additionally, degrees in counseling, such as those highlighted in addiction counseling degree online counseling, can offer pathways into support services intersecting with veterinary care or animal welfare. These diverse options demonstrate the growing connection between animal science and psychological or therapeutic disciplines in modern careers.

Best Scientists Citing Rick Stock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles