World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Animal Science and Veterinary 39 1243 1149 365 312 261 7812

Chris R. Calkins publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Chris R. Calkins between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Chris R. Calkins published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2008. 3 of the 275 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2008. 1980: 4 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1980 2025

275 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Chris R. Calkins: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 4
1981 1
1982 1
1983 2
1984 1
1985 2
1986 7
1987 5
1988 3
1989 2
1990 2
1991 3
1992 2
1993 3
1994 2
1995 4
1996 6
1997 4
1998 1
1999 4
2000 8
2001 7
2002 6
2003 10
2004 10
2005 6
2006 8
2007 13
2008 24
2009 10
2010 15
2011 8
2012 6
2013 9
2014 7
2015 7
2016 4
2017 12
2018 11
2019 15
2020 9
2021 5
2022 3
2023 0
2024 1
2025 2
Total 275
Download as CSV

Chris R. Calkins publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris R. Calkins sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 84 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 29–33 to 442+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 109. Most scientists, 109, have 119–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 259–263 publications, is where this scientist sits. 29–33 publications: 1 scientist 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29–33 publications 442+

This scientist: 261 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
29–33 1
34–38 6
39–43 17
44–48 23
49–53 28
54–58 44
59–63 66
64–68 75
69–73 71
74–78 85
79–83 108
84–88 105
89–93 84
94–98 103
99–103 97
104–108 95
109–113 89
114–118 88
119–123 109
124–128 93
129–133 89
134–138 95
139–143 92
144–148 80
149–153 75
154–158 74
159–163 67
164–168 53
169–173 62
174–178 63
179–183 50
184–188 55
189–193 50
194–198 27
199–203 44
204–208 31
209–213 28
214–218 38
219–223 33
224–228 36
229–233 29
234–238 35
239–243 23
244–248 24
249–253 29
254–258 28
259–263 21 261
264–268 25
269–273 11
274–278 18
279–283 13
284–288 18
289–293 10
294–298 12
299–303 11
304–308 15
309–313 14
314–318 14
319–323 8
324–328 8
329–333 13
334–338 14
339–343 13
344–348 10
349–353 11
354–358 5
359–363 8
364–368 8
369–373 6
374–378 7
379–383 8
384–388 3
389–393 4
394–398 5
399–403 8
404–408 5
409–413 4
414–418 3
419–423 8
424–428 5
429–433 3
434–438 5
439–441 5
442+ 99
Download as CSV

Chris R. Calkins D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris R. Calkins sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 77+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 158. Most scientists, 158, have 31 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 5
21 22
22 31
23 44
24 53
25 66
26 80
27 101
28 106
29 116
30 154
31 158
32 143
33 137
34 126
35 134
36 112
37 115
38 105
39 111 39
40 107
41 87
42 74
43 62
44 61
45 41
46 51
47 43
48 28
49 47
50 40
51 34
52 33
53 43
54 16
55 32
56 21
57 18
58 28
59 33
60 17
61 21
62 18
63 21
64 9
65 20
66 11
67 16
68 12
69 17
70 13
71 15
72 11
73 11
74 14
75 5
76 6
77+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Animal Industry Service Award, American Society of Animal Science
  • 2011 - Meats Research Award, American Society of Animal Science

Overview

Chris R. Calkins is affiliated with the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences with notable work in Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science, Biomedical Engineering, Insect Science, and Nutrition and Dietetics.

Their published work includes studies on aspects of meat quality, animal nutrition, and advanced chemical sensor technologies. Key topics of study consist of Meat and Animal Product Quality, Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies, Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods, Bee Products Chemical Analysis, Carbon Nanotubes in Composites, and Food Quality and Safety Studies.

Frequent co-authors in Calkins's collaborations include Nicolas J Herrera, Felipe Ribeiro, N. Bland, M. Henriott, and Eric M Hofferber.

Research outputs have appeared predominantly in a core group of venues, including the Journal of Animal Science, Meat Science, Meat and Muscle Biology, ECS Meeting Abstracts, and Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine.

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Calkins include:

  • Ultimate pH effects on dry-aged beef quality, 2020, Meat Science
  • Impact of myoglobin oxygenation state prior to frozen storage on color stability of thawed beef steaks through retail display, 2020, Meat Science
  • Color and lipid stability of dry aged beef during retail display, 2020, Meat Science
  • Impact of myoglobin oxygenation level on color stability of frozen beef steaks, 2020, Journal of Animal Science
  • Detection of single walled carbon nanotube based sensors in a large mammal, 2021, Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine

Calkins has received recognition including the Animal Industry Service Award from the American Society of Animal Science in 2014 and the Meats Research Award from the same society in 2011.

Best Publications

  • A fresh look at meat flavor

    C.R. Calkins;J.M. Hodgen

  • Research Guidelines for Cookery, Sensory Evaluation, and Instrumental Tenderness Measurements of Meat

    Tommy L. Wheeler;Linda S. Papadopoulos;K. Miller

  • Visible/near-infrared hyperspectral imaging for beef tenderness prediction

    Govindarajan Konda Naganathan;Lauren M. Grimes;Jeyamkondan Subbiah;Chris R. Calkins

  • Muscle profiling: Characterizing the muscles of the beef chuck and round.

    D.D. Von Seggern;C.R. Calkins;D.D. Johnson;J.E. Brickler

  • COUNTRY-OF-ORIGIN LABELING OF BEEF PRODUCTS: U.S. CONSUMERS' PERCEPTIONS

    Wendy J. Umberger;Dillon M. Feuz;Chris R. Calkins;Bethany M. Sitz

  • Fiber-type composition of muscles of the beef chuck and round

    K. S. Kirchofer;Chris R. Calkins;B. L. Gwartney

  • U.S. consumer preference and willingness-to-pay for domestic corn-fed beef versus international grass-fed beef measured through an experimental auction

    Wendy J. Umberger;Dillon M. Feuz;Chris R. Calkins;Karen Killinger-Mann

  • Consumer Sensory Acceptance and Value of Domestic, Canadian, and Australian Grass-Fed Beef Steaks

    B. M. Sitz;Chris R. Calkins;D. M. Feuz;W. J. Umberger

  • Consumer sensory acceptance and value for beef steaks of similar tenderness, but differing in marbling level

    K. M. Killinger;Chris R. Calkins;W. J. Umberger;D. M. Feuz

  • Effects of Preblending, Reduced Fat and Salt Levels on Frankfurter Characteristics

    L. W. Hand;C. A. Hollingsworth;C. R. Calkins;R. W. Mandigo

  • Consumer visual preference and value for beef steaks differing in marbling level and color

    K. M. Killinger;Chris R. Calkins;W. J. Umberger;D. M. Feuz

  • Application of exogenous enzymes to beef muscle of high and low-connective tissue.

    G.A. Sullivan;C.R. Calkins

  • Consumer sensory acceptance and value of wet-aged and dry-aged beef steaks

    B. M. Sitz;Chris R. Calkins;D. M. Feuz;W. J. Umberger

  • Relationship of Fiber Type Composition to Marbling and Tenderness of Bovine Muscle

    Unknown

  • Optical scattering in beef steak to predict tenderness using hyperspectral imaging in the VIS-NIR region

    Kim Cluff;Govindarajan Konda Naganathan;Jeyamkondan Subbiah;Renfu Lu

  • Influence of oxidative damage to proteins on meat tenderness using a proteomics approach.

    Jessica Moraes Malheiros;Camila Pereira Braga;Ryan Albert Grove;Felipe Azevedo Ribeiro

  • Partial least squares analysis of near-infrared hyperspectral images for beef tenderness prediction

    Govindarajan Konda Naganathan;Lauren M. Grimes;Jeyamkondan Subbiah;Chris R. Calkins

  • Effects over time of feeding a beta-adrenergic agonist to wether lambs on animal performance, muscle growth, endogenous muscle proteinase activities, and meat tenderness.

    T D Pringle;C R Calkins;C R Calkins;M Koohmaraie;M Koohmaraie;S J Jones;S J Jones

  • U.S. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Flavor and Tenderness in Steaks as Determined with an Experimental Auction

    Dillon M. Feuz;Wendy J. Umberger;Chris R. Calkins;Bethany M. Sitz

  • Comparative Evaluation of Whey Protein Concentrate, Soy Protein Isolate and Calcium‐Reduced Nonfat Dry Milk as Binders in an Emulsion‐Type Sausage

    S. A. Ensor;R. W. Mandigo;C. R. Calkins;L. N. Quint

  • Myofibrillar protein turnover in feed-restricted and realimented beef cattle.

    Steven J. Jones;D. Starkey;Chris R. Calkins;J.D. Crouse

  • Effects of backgrounding and growing programs on beef carcass quality and yield

    Terry J. Klopfenstein;R. Cooper;D. J. Jordon;D. Shain

  • Relationships among Calcium-Dependent Protease, Cathepsins B and H, Meat Tenderness and the Response of Muscle to Aging

    Chris R. Calkins;S. C. Seideman

  • A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance and value of domestic beef steaks and steaks from a branded, Argentine beef program.

    K. M. Killinger;Chris R. Calkins;W. J. Umberger;D. M. Feuz

  • Concentration of Creatine Phosphate, Adenine Nucleotides and Their Derivatives in Electrically Stimulated and Nonstimulated Beef Muscle

    C. R. Calkins;T. R. Dutson;G. C. Smith;Z. L. Carpenter

Frequent Co-Authors

Galen E. Erickson
Galen E. Erickson University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Kent M. Eskridge
Kent M. Eskridge University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Ashok Samal
Ashok Samal University of Nebraska–Lincoln
D. D. Johnson
D. D. Johnson University of Florida
Terry J. Klopfenstein
Terry J. Klopfenstein University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Rui J.B. Bessa
Rui J.B. Bessa University of Lisbon
Rodger K. Johnson
Rodger K. Johnson University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Austin Lewis
Austin Lewis University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Rick Stock
Rick Stock University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Tommy L. Wheeler
Tommy L. Wheeler United States Department of Agriculture

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Animal Science and Veterinary fields, exploring related degrees can open diverse career opportunities. For instance, understanding human and animal behavior is crucial in both veterinary care and therapeutic settings. Programs like online marriage and family therapy masters programs offer valuable insights into counseling techniques that can complement animal welfare roles.

Advanced studies often lead to specialized careers. Pursuing a phd in counseling online allows professionals to deepen their understanding of psychological principles, which can be applied in animal-assisted therapies or rehabilitative contexts.

Graduates with Animal Science degrees have access to high paying jobs with animal science degree, ranging from veterinary specialists to roles in research, nutrition, and wildlife management. These careers not only offer financial rewards but also contribute significantly to animal health and ecological conservation.

In addition, leadership roles such as becoming an athletic director require specific education, highlighting the importance of knowing what degree do you need to be an athletic director. This knowledge is useful for those aiming to manage sports programs for animals or integrate fitness management with veterinary care.

Best Scientists Citing Chris R. Calkins

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles