World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
109
Citations
48747
World Ranking
5731
National Ranking
3082

Psychology

D-Index
109
Citations
48408
World Ranking
413
National Ranking
262

Scott W. Woods publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott W. Woods sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 534 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Scott W. Woods D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott W. Woods sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott W. Woods is affiliated with Yale University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of medicine and psychology, with significant contributions to psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, and clinical and experimental psychology.

The scientist's work extensively addresses schizophrenia research and treatment, mental health and psychiatry, mental health research topics, and functional brain connectivity studies. Additional topics include bipolar disorder and treatment, mental health treatment and access, as well as child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Woods include Diana O. Perkins, Elaine F. Walker, Barbara A. Cornblatt, Jean Addington, and Daniel H. Mathalon, reflecting a broad network within psychiatry and mental health research communities.

Key venues for publication include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Schizophrenia Research
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Schizophrenia

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Scott W. Woods include:

  • "Brain-phenotype models fail for individuals who defy sample stereotypes," 2022, Nature
  • "North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS 3): Methods and baseline description," 2020, Schizophrenia Research
  • "Prevalence of Individuals at Clinical High-Risk of Psychosis in the General Population and Clinical Samples: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," 2021, Brain Sciences
  • "Accelerated cortical thinning precedes and predicts conversion to psychosis: The NAPLS3 longitudinal study of youth at clinical high-risk," 2022, Molecular Psychiatry
  • "Reducing the Duration of Untreated Psychosis (DUP) in a US Community: A Quasi-Experimental Trial," 2021, Schizophrenia Bulletin Open

Best Publications

  • Prodromal Assessment With the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes and the Scale of Prodromal Symptoms: Predictive Validity, Interrater Reliability, and Training to Reliability

    Tandy J. Miller;Thomas H. McGlashan;Joanna L. Rosen;Kristen Cadenhead

  • Chlorpromazine equivalent doses for the newer atypical antipsychotics

    Scott W. Woods

  • Prediction of psychosis in youth at high clinical risk: a multisite longitudinal study in North America.

    Tyrone D. Cannon;Kristin Cadenhead;Barbara Cornblatt;Scott W. Woods

  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy, imipramine, or their combination for panic disorder: A randomized controlled trial.

    David H. Barlow;Jack M. Gorman;M. Katherine Shear;Scott W. Woods

  • Multicenter collaborative panic disorder severity scale.

    M. Katherine Shear;Timothy A. Brown;David H. Barlow;Roy Money

  • Prospective Diagnosis of the Initial Prodrome for Schizophrenia Based on the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes: Preliminary Evidence of Interrater Reliability and Predictive Validity

    Tandy J. Miller;Thomas H. McGlashan;Joanna Lifshey Rosen;Lubna Somjee

  • Symptom assessment in schizophrenic prodromal states.

    Tandy J. Miller;Thomas H. McGlashan;Scott W. Woods;Kelly Stein

  • The Psychosis-Risk Syndrome: Handbook for Diagnosis and Follow-Up

    Thomas H. McGlashan;Barbara Walsh;Scott Woods

  • Randomized, double-blind trial of olanzapine versus placebo in patients prodromally symptomatic for psychosis.

    Thomas H. McGlashan;Robert B. Zipursky;Diana Perkins;Jean Addington

  • Serotonin function in anxiety. II. Effects of the serotonin agonist MCPP in panic disorder patients and healthy subjects.

    D. S. Charney;S. W. Woods;W. K. Goodman;G. R. Heninger

  • Progressive Reduction in Cortical Thickness as Psychosis Develops: A Multisite Longitudinal Neuroimaging Study of Youth at Elevated Clinical Risk

    Tyrone D. Cannon;Yoonho Chung;George He;Daqiang Sun

  • An Individualized Risk Calculator for Research in Prodromal Psychosis

    Tyrone D. Cannon;Changhong Yu;Jean Addington;Carrie E. Bearden

  • Fear-potentiated startle in humans: effects of anticipatory anxiety on the acoustic blink reflex.

    Christian Grillon;Rezvan Ameli;Scott W. Woods;Kathleen Merikangas

  • At clinical high risk for psychosis: Outcome for nonconverters

    Jean Addington;Barbara A. Cornblatt;Kristin S. Cadenhead;Tyrone D. Cannon

  • Validity of the Prodromal Risk Syndrome for First Psychosis: Findings From the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study

    Scott W. Woods;Jean Addington;Kristin S. Cadenhead;Tyrone D. Cannon

  • Neuropsychology of the Prodrome to Psychosis in the NAPLS Consortium: Relationship to Family History and Conversion to Psychosis

    Larry J. Seidman;Anthony J. Giuliano;Eric C. Meyer;Jean Addington

  • Heterogeneity of Psychosis Risk Within Individuals at Clinical High Risk: A Meta-analytical Stratification

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Paolo Fusar-Poli;Marco Cappucciati;Marco Cappucciati;Stefan Borgwardt;Scott W. Woods

  • Therapists, therapist variables, and cognitive-behavioral therapy outcome in a multicenter trial for panic disorder.

    Jonathan D. Huppert;Lynn F. Bufka;David H. Barlow;Jack M. Gorman

  • Dose Equivalents for Second-Generation Antipsychotics: The Minimum Effective Dose Method

    Stefan Leucht;Myrto Samara;Stephan Heres;Maxine X. Patel

  • Association of Thalamic Dysconnectivity and Conversion to Psychosis in Youth and Young Adults at Elevated Clinical Risk

    Alan Anticevic;Kristen Haut;John D. Murray;Grega Repovs

  • Co-morbidity and familial aggregation of alcoholism and anxiety disorders

    K. R. Merikangas;D. E. Stevens;B. Fenton;M. Stolar

  • Neurobiological mechanisms of panic anxiety: biochemical and behavioral correlates of yohimbine-induced panic attacks.

    Dennis S. Charney;Scott W. Woods;Wayne K. Goodman;George R. Heninger

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean Addington
Jean Addington University of Calgary
Thomas H. McGlashan
Thomas H. McGlashan Yale University
Ming T. Tsuang
Ming T. Tsuang University of California, San Diego
Tyrone D. Cannon
Tyrone D. Cannon Yale University
Larry J. Seidman
Larry J. Seidman Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Daniel H. Mathalon
Daniel H. Mathalon University of California, San Francisco
Elaine F. Walker
Elaine F. Walker Emory University
Diana O. Perkins
Diana O. Perkins University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Barbara A. Cornblatt
Barbara A. Cornblatt Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Carrie E. Bearden
Carrie E. Bearden University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in psychology or looking to specialize further, a variety of flexible online programs are available. Many students choose to begin their journey with a graduate certificate in psychology online, which provides foundational knowledge and can often be completed quickly.

For those interested in workplace behavior and organizational effectiveness, an io psychology online degree is a popular option. Aspiring leaders and advanced practitioners may choose to pursue a doctorate in industrial organizational psychology online to access high-level opportunities in research, consulting, or academia.

If criminal justice or legal systems intrigue you, explore top forensic psychology masters programs that are also available online. These pathways can lead to roles in law enforcement, corrections, or court systems. No matter your area of interest, online psychology degrees offer flexible learning and open doors to a diverse range of career outcomes.

Best Scientists Citing Scott W. Woods

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles