World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
41
Citations
10783
World Ranking
2149
National Ranking
255

John S.L. McCombie publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John S.L. McCombie sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 269 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

John S.L. McCombie D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John S.L. McCombie sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

John S.L. McCombie is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom and conducts research primarily within the fields of Economics, Econometrics, and Finance. Their work spans subfields including Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Political Science and International Relations, Astronomy and Astrophysics, and Sociology and Political Science.

The main topics addressed in McCombie's research include economic growth and productivity, economic theory and policy, economic theories and models, economic and technological innovation, fiscal policy and economic growth, firm innovation and growth, and global trade and economics.

McCombie has published extensively in several prominent venues, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Post Keynesian Economics
  • Metroeconomica
  • Review of Keynesian Economics
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by McCombie are:

  • "The illusions of calculating total factor productivity and testing growth models: from Cobb-Douglas to Solow and Romer" (2020), Journal of Post Keynesian Economics
  • "Structural change and cumulative causation: A Kaldorian approach" (2020), Metroeconomica
  • "Why are Some Countries Richer than Others? A Reassessment of Mankiw-Romer-Weil's Test of the Neoclassical Growth Model" (2024), SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "Why the conventional test of Thirlwall's law is still not a 'near-tautology': a rejoinder to Professor Blecker" (2023), Review of Keynesian Economics
  • "Production Function Estimation: Biased Coefficients and Endogenous Regressors, or a Case of Collective Amnesia?" (2021), SSRN Electronic Journal

McCombie has collaborated frequently with several researchers. Notable coauthors include:

  • Jesús Felipe
  • Aashish Mehta
  • Donna Faye Bajaro
  • Gemma Estrada
  • Guilherme Magacho

Best Publications

  • The Balance-of-Payments Constraint as an Explanation of International Growth Rate Differences

    Anthony P. Thirlwall

  • Economic growth and the balance-of-payments constraint

    John S. L. McCombie;A.P. Thirlwall

  • Economic Growth and the Balance-of-Payments Constraint

    J. S. L. McCombie;Anthony Thirlwall

  • Increasing returns and economic growth: some evidence for manufacturing from the European Union regions

    B. Fingleton;J.S.L McCombie

  • Economic Growth and the Balance-of-Payments Constraint

    Unknown

  • Productivity growth and economic performance : essays on Verdoorn's law

    J. S. L. McCombie;Maurizio Pugno;Bruno Soro

  • A New View of Economic Growth.

    Unknown

  • Essays on Balance of Payments Constrained Growth : Theory and Evidence

    J. S. L. McCombie;A. P. Thirlwall

  • On the Empirics of Balance-Of-Payments–Constrained Growth

    John S.L. McCombie

  • The Role of the Balance of Payments in Economic Growth

    John McCombie;Mark Roberts

  • “THE VERDOORN LAW CONTROVERSY”: SOME NEW EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE USING U.S. STATE DATA

    J. S. L. McCOMBIE;J. R. de Ridder

  • Productivity Growth and Economic Performance

    John McCombie;Maurizio Pugno;Bruno Soro

  • Kaldor’s Laws in Retrospect

    John S. L. McCombie

  • ‘Thirlwall’s Law' and balance of payments constrained growth – a comment on the debate

    J. S. L. Mccombie

  • The Tyranny of the Identity: Growth Accounting Revisited

    Jesus Felipe;John McCombie

  • New Estimates of Returns to Scale and Spatial Spillovers for EU Regional Manufacturing, 1986—2002:

    Alvaro Angeriz;John McCombie;Mark Roberts

  • The Multi-Sectoral Thirlwall's Law: evidence from 14 developed European countries using product-level data

    João P Romero;John Stuart McCombie

  • RETURNS TO SCALE AND REGIONAL GROWTH: THE STATIC‐DYNAMIC VERDOORN LAW PARADOX REVISITED*

    John S. L. McCombie;Mark Roberts

  • The Dynamic Harrod Foreign Trade Multiplier and the Demand-orientated Approach to Economic Growth: an Evaluation

    J. S. L. McCombie;A. P. Thirlwall

  • HOW SOUND ARE THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION

    Jesus Felipe;J. S. L. McCombie

  • Increasing Returns, Productivity, and Output Growth: The Case of the United States

    John S. L. McCombie;John R. de Ridder

  • The Aggregate Production Function and the Measurement of Technical Change: 'Not Even Wrong'

    Jesus Felipe;J. S. L. McCombie

  • Phases of Capitalist Development.

    John S. L. McCombie;Angus Maddison

  • Essays on Balance of Payments Constrained Growth

    A.P. Thirlwall;John S.L. McCombie

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip Arestis
Philip Arestis University of Cambridge
Anthony Thirlwall
Anthony Thirlwall University of Kent
Roger W. Vickerman
Roger W. Vickerman University of Kent
Malcolm Sawyer
Malcolm Sawyer University of Leeds
Bernard Fingleton
Bernard Fingleton University of Cambridge
Angus Maddison
Angus Maddison University of Groningen
Peter Tyler
Peter Tyler University of Cambridge
Ron Martin
Ron Martin University of Cambridge
Philip McCann
Philip McCann University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Economics and Finance opens up many exciting online education opportunities. For those interested in leadership roles, consider pursuing a project management degree salary pathway to increase your earning potential and develop essential management skills.

If you want to fast-track your education, an accelerated bachelor's degree in finance enables you to enter the workforce sooner and start gaining hands-on experience. For professionals seeking top management positions, the quickest mba program offers a pathway to advanced business knowledge without years of study.

Not all roles require a full degree—sometimes a credential is enough. Completing a certified bookkeeper course provides specialized skills that are in high demand and can open doors in finance departments or independent consulting. Whichever path you choose, online and accelerated programs can help you achieve your career goals more efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing John S.L. McCombie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles