World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
55
Citations
8810
World Ranking
3023
National Ranking
1064

Lawrence M. Hanks publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence M. Hanks sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 194 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Lawrence M. Hanks D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence M. Hanks sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lawrence M. Hanks is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science, with significant work in subfields such as Insect Science, Ecology, Cell Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Plant Science.

The scientist's main topics of research include:

  • Forest Insect Ecology and Management
  • Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Coleoptera: Cerambycidae studies
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies

Lawrence M. Hanks has published extensively in several venues, with the most frequent being:

  • Journal of Chemical Ecology (8 publications)
  • Environmental Entomology (6 publications)
  • Journal of Economic Entomology (4 publications)
  • Insects (3 publications)
  • NeoBiota (1 publication)

Co-authorship has been an important element of their research, with frequent collaborators including:

  • Jocelyn G. Millar (25 joint publications)
  • Yunfan Zou (10 joint publications)
  • Weliton D. Silva (7 joint publications)
  • Anna C Grommes (6 joint publications)
  • José Maurício S. Bento (6 joint publications)

Their recent publications include:

  • "Worldwide tests of generic attractants, a promising tool for early detection of non-native cerambycid species," 2023, NeoBiota
  • "Complex Blends of Synthetic Pheromones are Effective Multi-Species Attractants for Longhorned Beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)," 2020, Journal of Economic Entomology
  • "A Symmetrical Diester as the Sex Attractant Pheromone of the North American Click Beetle Parallelostethus attenuatus (Say) (Coleoptera: Elateridae)," 2022, Journal of Chemical Ecology
  • "Rapid Assessment of Cerambycid Beetle Biodiversity in a Tropical Rainforest in Yunnan Province, China, Using a Multicomponent Pheromone Lure," 2021, Insects
  • "Dose-responses of seven species of cerambycid beetles to synthesized pheromones in field experiments," 2023, Journal of Economic Entomology

Best Publications

  • INFLUENCE OF THE LARVAL HOST PLANT ON REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES OF CERAMBYCID BEETLES

    L. M. Hanks

  • Causes and consequences of cannibalism in noncarnivorous insects.

    Matthew L. Richardson;Robert F. Mitchell;Peter F. Reagel;Lawrence M. Hanks

  • Sex and Aggregation-Sex Pheromones of Cerambycid Beetles: Basic Science and Practical Applications.

    Lawrence M. Hanks;Jocelyn G. Millar

  • Natural enemies and plant water relations influence the distribution of an armored scale insect

    Lawrence M. Hanks;Robert F. Denno

  • Local Adaptation in the Armored Scale Insect Pseudaulacaspis Pentagona (Homoptera: Diaspididae)

    Lawrence M. Hanks;Robert F. Denno

  • Water relations of host trees and resistance to the phloem-boring beetle Phoracantha semipunctata F. (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae).

    Lawrence M. Hanks;Timothy D. Paine;Jocelyn G. Millar;Christopher D. Campbell

  • Role of contact pheromones in mate recognition in Xylotrechus colonus.

    Matthew D. Ginzel;Gary J. Blomquist;Jocelyn G. Millar;Lawrence M. Hanks

  • Male-Produced Aggregation Pheromone of the Cerambycid Beetle Neoclytus acuminatus acuminatus

    Emerson S. Lacey;Matthew D. Ginzel;Jocelyn G. Millar;Lawrence M. Hanks

  • Field bioassays of cerambycid pheromones reveal widespread parsimony of pheromone structures, enhancement by host plant volatiles, and antagonism by components from heterospecifics

    Lawrence M. Hanks;Jocelyn G. Millar

  • Treating Panel Traps with a Fluoropolymer Enhances their Efficiency in Capturing Cerambycid Beetles

    Elizabeth E. Graham;Robert F. Mitchell;Peter F. Reagel;James D. Barbour

  • Host species preference and larval performance in the wood-boring beetlePhoracantha semipunctata F.

    Lawrence M. Hanks;Timothy D. Paine;Jocelyn G. Millar

  • A Male-Produced Aggregation Pheromone of Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), a Major Vector of Pine Wood Nematode

    Stephen A. Teale;Jacob D. Wickham;Feiping Zhang;Jun Su

  • Sequencing and characterizing odorant receptors of the cerambycid beetle Megacyllene caryae.

    Robert F. Mitchell;David T. Hughes;Charles W. Luetje;Jocelyn G. Millar

  • Manipulating the abundance of natural enemies in ornamental landscapes with floral resource plants

    Eric J. Rebek;Clifford S. Sadof;Lawrence M. Hanks

  • Using generic pheromone lures to expedite identification of aggregation pheromones for the cerambycid beetles Xylotrechus nauticus, Phymatodes lecontei, and Neoclytus modestus modestus.

    Lawrence M. Hanks;Jocelyn G. Millar;Jardel A. Moreira;James D. Barbour

  • Floral Host Plants of Syrphidae and Tachinidae (Diptera) of Central Illinois

    John Frazier Tooker;Martin Hauser;Lawrence M. Hanks

  • Response of the Woodborers Monochamus carolinensis and Monochamus titillator (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) to Known Cerambycid Pheromones in the Presence and Absence of the Host Plant Volatile α-Pinene

    Jeremy D. Allison;Jessica L. McKenney;Jocelyn G. Millar;J. Steven McElfresh

  • Influence of Plant Community Structure on Natural Enemies of Pine Needle Scale (Homoptera: Diaspididae) in Urban Landscapes

    John F. Tooker;Lawrence M. Hanks

  • Mating behavior of the Eucalyptus longhorned borer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and the adaptive significance of long 'horns'.

    Lawrence M. Hanks;Jocelyn G. Millar;Timothy D. Paine

  • Contact Pheromones as Mate Recognition Cues of Four Species of Longhorned Beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)

    Matthew D. Ginzel;Lawrence M. Hanks

  • Role of host plant volatiles in mate location for three species of longhorned beetles.

    Matthew D. Ginzel;Matthew D. Ginzel;Lawrence M. Hanks

Frequent Co-Authors

Jocelyn G. Millar
Jocelyn G. Millar University of California, Riverside
Rhett D. Harrison
Rhett D. Harrison World Agroforestry, Zambia
Andrew V. Suarez
Andrew V. Suarez University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Adrian Smith
Adrian Smith University of Oxford
Robert F. Denno
Robert F. Denno University of Maryland, College Park
May R. Berenbaum
May R. Berenbaum University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Neil O'Connell
Neil O'Connell University College Dublin
Gary J. Blomquist
Gary J. Blomquist University of Nevada Reno
Mark S. Hoddle
Mark S. Hoddle University of California, Riverside
Therese M. Poland
Therese M. Poland US Forest Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career options, especially within healthcare and the life sciences. Many students interested in these fields transition into clinical and nursing roles, supporting both research and patient care.

Nursing continues to evolve with high demand for qualified professionals. Those curious about earning potential can learn more about psychiatric nurse practitioner salary differences by state. For accelerated career opportunities, consider fast track nurse practitioner programs, which allow for quicker entry into advanced nursing positions.

If you are a registered nurse looking to advance your degree, online options such as 6-month rn to bsn program offer a flexible route to further qualifications. Similarly, those with an associate’s degree in nursing may consider moving forward with asn to fnp programs for advanced family nurse practitioner roles.

These online pathways can complement your background in Ecology and Evolution, helping you contribute to healthcare communities while building a rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence M. Hanks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles