World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
85
Citations
26434
World Ranking
637
National Ranking
228

Robert F. Denno publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert F. Denno sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 162 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Robert F. Denno D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert F. Denno sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert F. Denno was affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their academic career was primarily connected to this institution, where they contributed to their field through research and scholarship.

Although specific details on research topics, recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, and book publications are not provided, Denno's profile indicates a dedicated academic presence. The lack of listed recent papers and co-authors suggests that available data may not capture the full breadth of their work, but the institutional affiliation confirms engagement within an established research environment.

Denno's professional activities involved participation in various fields of study, subfields, and research topics, although exact categories are not specified in the available data. This absence restricts detailed analysis of their specialty areas or contributions to specific scientific themes.

As no awards or honors were recorded, the academic record centers mainly on institutional and publication-related attributes rather than recognitions or distinctions. Denno is noted as deceased, and retrospective accounts should reflect completed contributions rather than ongoing research.

Best Publications

  • Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs

    James J. Elser;William F. Fagan;Robert F. Denno;Dean R. Dobberfuhl;Dean R. Dobberfuhl

  • PHYSIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY OF DISPERSAL POLYMORPHISM IN INSECTS

    Anthony J. Zera;Robert F. Denno

  • Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems

    Robert F. Denno;Mark S. McClure

  • PLANT WATER STRESS AND ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR HERBIVOROUS INSECTS: A NEW SYNTHESIS

    Andrea F. Huberty;Robert F. Denno

  • Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects : competition reexamined and resurrected

    R F Denno;and M S McClure;J R Ott

  • Responses of invertebrate natural enemies to complex-structured habitats: a meta-analytical synthesis

    Gail A. Langellotto;Gail A. Langellotto;Robert F. Denno

  • Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades

    Deborah L. Finke;Robert F. Denno

  • Interspecific interactions in phytophagous insects revisited: a quantitative assessment of competition theory

    Ian Kaplan;Robert F. Denno

  • POSITIVE PREDATOR–PREDATOR INTERACTIONS: ENHANCED PREDATION RATES AND SYNERGISTIC SUPPRESSION OF APHID POPULATIONS

    John E. Losey;Robert F. Denno

  • THE SLOW‐GROWTH–HIGH‐MORTALITY HYPOTHESIS: A TEST USING THE CABBAGE BUTTERFLY

    Betty Benrey;Robert F. Denno

  • INTRAGUILD PREDATION DIMINISHED IN COMPLEX-STRUCTURED VEGETATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR PREY SUPPRESSION

    Deborah L. Finke;Robert F. Denno

  • Nitrogen in Insects: Implications for Trophic Complexity and Species Diversification

    William F. Fagan;Evan Siemann;Charles Mitter;Robert F. Denno

  • Predator diversity and the functioning of ecosystems: the role of intraguild predation in dampening trophic cascades

    Deborah L. Finke;Robert F. Denno

  • Insect Ecology: Behavior, Populations and Communities

    Peter W. Price;Robert F. Denno;Micky D. Eubanks;Deborah L. Finke

  • Role of Enemy-Free Space and Plant Quality in Host-Plant Selection by Willow Beetles

    Robert F. Denno;Stig Larsson;Karen L. Olmstead

  • The Influence of Dispersal and Diet Breadth on Patterns of Genetic Isolation by Distance in Phytophagous Insects

    Merrill A. Peterson;Robert F. Denno

  • MIGHT NITROGEN LIMITATION PROMOTE OMNIVORY AMONG CARNIVOROUS ARTHROPODS

    Robert F. Denno;William F. Fagan

  • BOTTOM‐UP FORCES MEDIATE NATURAL‐ENEMY IMPACT IN A PHYTOPHAGOUS INSECT COMMUNITY

    Robert F. Denno;Claudio Gratton;Merrill A. Peterson;Gail A. Langellotto

  • Insect Ecology: Taxonomic Index

    Peter W. Price;Robert F. Denno;Micky D. Eubanks;Deborah L. Finke

  • CHAPTER 4 – Leaf Age as a Predictor of Herbivore Distribution and Abundance

    Michael J. Raupp;Robert F. Denno

  • CONSTITUTIVE AND INDUCED DEFENSES TO HERBIVORY IN ABOVE-AND BELOWGROUND PLANT TISSUES

    Ian Kaplan;Rayko Halitschke;André Kessler;Sandra Sardanelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian Kaplan
Ian Kaplan Purdue University West Lafayette
Micky D. Eubanks
Micky D. Eubanks Texas A&M University
Peter W. Price
Peter W. Price Northern Arizona University
Claudio Gratton
Claudio Gratton University of Wisconsin–Madison
Douglas W. Tallamy
Douglas W. Tallamy University of Delaware
William F. Fagan
William F. Fagan University of Maryland, College Park
George K. Roderick
George K. Roderick University of California, Berkeley
Galen P. Dively
Galen P. Dively University of Maryland, College Park
André Kessler
André Kessler Cornell University
Hugh Dingle
Hugh Dingle University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a future in Ecology and Evolution opens doors to diverse career options, and many related fields offer accessible online pathways. For those interested in communication disorders or environmental health, learning more about the education required to be a speech pathologist is a great way to understand how biology-based backgrounds can transition into healthcare roles.

Interdisciplinary skills are valuable—and pursuing an architect degree online can complement ecological studies by expanding your design and sustainability expertise. Similarly, robust data analysis is crucial in ecology, making an online degree mathematics an excellent asset for research, modeling, and advanced scientific study.

Visual communication in science is increasingly important. By earning an online graphic design degree, you can learn to present complex ecological data in engaging and accessible formats—an essential skill for outreach and education. Consider these flexible online degrees to broaden your career opportunities alongside a core focus in Ecology and Evolution.

Best Scientists Citing Robert F. Denno

Recently Published Articles