What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
His primary scientific interests are in Ecology, Predation, Herbivore, Fire ant and Biological pest control.
His research on Ecology frequently connects to adjacent areas such as Zoology.
Micky D. Eubanks studied Predation and Heteroptera that intersect with Omnivore.
His research integrates issues of Mimulus guttatus, Inbreeding, Inbreeding depression, Host and Philaenus spumarius in his study of Herbivore.
In Fire ant, Micky D. Eubanks works on issues like Beneficial insects, which are connected to Anthocoridae, Intraguild predation, Nabidae, Pest control and Hippodamia convergens.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including PEST analysis and Agronomy.
His most cited work include:
- Ecological consequences of interactions between ants and honeydew-producing insects. (369 citations)
- THE ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF VARIATION IN PLANTS AND PREY FOR AN OMNIVOROUS INSECT (166 citations)
- Insect Ecology: Behavior, Populations and Communities (166 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of investigation include Ecology, Herbivore, Predation, Botany and Insect ecology.
His research on Ecology often connects related areas such as Zoology.
His study in Herbivore is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Insect, Inbreeding, Plant defense against herbivory and Mimulus guttatus.
Micky D. Eubanks combines subjects such as Biological pest control and Lygaeidae with his study of Predation.
His work on Plutella, Philaenus spumarius and Hemiptera as part of general Botany study is frequently connected to Streptanthus polygaloides, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them.
His Insect ecology study incorporates themes from Entomology, Biological dispersal, Abiotic component and Life history.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ecology (70.59%)
- Herbivore (23.53%)
- Predation (18.49%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Ecology (70.59%)
- Herbivore (23.53%)
- Poinsettia (2.52%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Micky D. Eubanks mostly deals with Ecology, Herbivore, Poinsettia, Whitefly and Horticulture.
His work in Ecology is not limited to one particular discipline; it also encompasses Vertebrate.
His studies in Herbivore integrate themes in fields like Plant traits, Water stress, Foraging, Insect and Guild.
His Whitefly research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Phytoseiidae and Aphelinidae.
As part of one scientific family, he deals mainly with the area of Phytoseiidae, narrowing it down to issues related to the Biological pest control, and often Generalist and specialist species.
His work carried out in the field of Habitat brings together such families of science as Nest, Agroecosystem, Species richness and Crop.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Overcompensation for insect herbivory: a review and meta-analysis of the evidence. (19 citations)
- Sugar Feeding Patterns for Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) Mosquitoes in South Texas. (10 citations)
- Generalising indirect defence and resistance of plants (9 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
His primary areas of study are Ecology, Habitat, Herbivore, Vertebrate and Aedes aegypti.
His Ecology study frequently links to related topics such as Vegetative reproduction.
Micky D. Eubanks interconnects Range, Invertebrate, Ecology and Nest in the investigation of issues within Habitat.
His Herbivore research incorporates elements of Trophic cascade, Plant traits, Predation, Foraging and Natural enemies.
Micky D. Eubanks interconnects Carrion, Insect, Herbaceous plant and Guild in the investigation of issues within Vertebrate.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Culex, Feeding patterns and Aedes in addition to Aedes aegypti.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
