World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
33
Citations
5232
World Ranking
7803
National Ranking
770

John F. Murphy publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. Murphy sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 94 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

John F. Murphy D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. Murphy sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • THE IMPACT OF FINE SEDIMENT ON MACRO-INVERTEBRATES

    J. I. Jones;J. F. Murphy;A. L. Collins;A. L. Collins;D. A. Sear

  • Application of rhizobacteria for induced resistance

    Geoffrey W. Zehnder;John F. Murphy;Edward J. Sikora;Joseph W. Kloepper

  • Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial mediated protection in tomato against Tomato mottle virus

    John F. Murphy;Geoffrey W. Zehnder;David J. Schuster;Edward J. Sikora

  • The recovery of European freshwater biodiversity has come to a halt

    Unknown

  • Induction of resistance in tomato against cucumber mosaic cucumovirus by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria

    Geoffrey W. Zehnder;Changbin Yao;John F. Murphy;Edward R. Sikora

  • Rhizobacteria-Mediated Growth Promotion of Tomato Leads to Protection Against Cucumber mosaic virus

    John F. Murphy;M. S. Reddy;Choong-Min Ryu;Joseph W. Kloepper

  • Potential impact of climate change on aquatic insects : A sensitivity analysis for European caddisflies (Trichoptera) based on distribution patterns and ecological preferences

    Daniel Hering;Astrid Schmidt-Kloiber;John Murphy;Sofie Lücke

  • Seasonal dynamics of macroinvertebrate assemblages in the benthos and associated with detritus packs in two low-order streams with different riparian vegetation

    John F. Murphy;Paul S. Giller

  • A comparison of the European Water Framework Directive physical typology and RIVPACS-type models as alternative methods of establishing reference conditions for benthic macroinvertebrates

    John Davy-Bowker;Ralph T. Clarke;Richard K. Johnson;Jiri Kokes

  • Spatial scale and the aggregation of stream macroinvertebrates associated with leaf packs

    John F. Murphy;Paul S. Giller;Margaret A. Horan

  • Development of a biotic index using stream macroinvertebrates to assess stress from deposited fine sediment

    John F. Murphy;J. Iwan Jones;James L. Pretty;Chas P. Duerdoth

  • The development and testing of a macroinvertebrate biotic index for detecting the impact of acidity on streams

    Unknown

  • The susceptibility and response of inbred and outbred Mimulus guttatus to infection by Cucumber mosaic virus

    David E. Carr;John F. Murphy;Micky D. Eubanks

  • Macrofungal diversity of a temperate oak forest: a test of species richness estimators

    Unknown

  • A diagnostic biotic index for assessing acidity in sensitive streams in Britain

    John F. Murphy;John Davy-Bowker;Ben McFarland;Stephen James Ormerod

  • Spatial structure in lotic macroinvertebrate communities in England and Wales: relationship with physical, chemical and anthropogenic stress variables

    Unknown

  • Do agri-environment schemes result in improved water quality?

    J. Iwan Jones;John F. Murphy;Steven G. Anthony;Amanda Arnold

  • Evidence of recovery from acidification in the macroinvertebrate assemblages of UK fresh waters: A 20-year time series

    John F. Murphy;Julie H. Winterbottom;Stuart Orton;Gavin L. Simpson

  • Can macroinvertebrate biological traits indicate fine-grained sediment conditions in streams?

    J. F. Murphy;J. I. Jones;A. Arnold;C. P. Duerdoth

  • Separating natural from human enhanced methane emissions in headwater streams

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph W. Kloepper
Joseph W. Kloepper Auburn University
Micky D. Eubanks
Micky D. Eubanks Texas A&M University
Choong-Min Ryu
Choong-Min Ryu Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology
Molly Jahn
Molly Jahn University of Wisconsin–Madison
Byoung-Cheorl Kang
Byoung-Cheorl Kang Seoul National University
Xing Ma
Xing Ma Harbin Institute of Technology
Robert E. Rhoads
Robert E. Rhoads Louisiana State University
Rodrigo Rodriguez-Kabana
Rodrigo Rodriguez-Kabana Auburn University
Jane E. Polston
Jane E. Polston University of Florida
Massimo Turina
Massimo Turina National Research Council (CNR)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing John F. Murphy

Recently Published Articles