World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Santiago F. Elena

Santiago F. Elena

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
76
Citations
21672
World Ranking
1825
National Ranking
840

Medicine

D-Index
75
Citations
21710
World Ranking
19100
National Ranking
9525

Santiago F. Elena publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Santiago F. Elena sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 332 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Santiago F. Elena D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Santiago F. Elena sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

Santiago F. Elena is affiliated with the Santa Fe Institute in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. The scientist's work is notably concentrated in subfields including Plant Science, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, and Infectious Diseases.

The research topics covered by Santiago F. Elena include Plant Virus Research Studies, Evolution and Genetic Dynamics, Plant Parasitism and Resistance, Plant and Fungal Interactions Research, Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity, Bacteriophages and microbial interactions, and Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models.

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Santiago F. Elena are the following:

  • Four principles to establish a universal virus taxonomy (2023), published in PLoS Biology
  • Plant virus evolution under strong drought conditions results in a transition from parasitism to mutualism (2021), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • From genotypes to organisms: State-of-the-art and perspectives of a cornerstone in evolutionary dynamics (2021), published in Physics of Life Reviews
  • Viral Fitness Determines the Magnitude of Transcriptomic and Epigenomic Reprograming of Defense Responses in Plants (2020), published in Molecular Biology and Evolution
  • Transmission modes affect the population structure of potato virus Y in potato (2020), published in PLoS Pathogens

Santiago F. Elena has frequently published in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Virus Evolution, Viruses, Preprints.org, and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Virus Evolution
  • Viruses
  • Preprints.org
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Collaborators regularly working with Santiago F. Elena include María J. Olmo-Uceda, Rubén González, Anamarija Butković, Josep Sardanyés, and Silvia Ambrós.

  • María J. Olmo-Uceda
  • Rubén González
  • Anamarija Butković
  • Josep Sardanyés
  • Silvia Ambrós

The scientist has contributed to a book titled "Viral Fitness and Evolution," published by Springer Science+Business Media in 2023.

Santiago F. Elena is a recipient of the membership in the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO).

Best Publications

  • Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation.

    Santiago F. Elena;Richard E. Lenski

  • Perspective: Evolution and detection of genetic robustness.

    J. Arjan G. M. de Visser;Joachim Hermisson;Günter P. Wagner;Lauren Ancel Meyers

  • The distribution of fitness effects caused by single-nucleotide substitutions in an RNA virus.

    Rafael Sanjuán;Andrés Moya;Santiago F. Elena

  • Basic concepts in RNA virus evolution.

    Esteban Domingo;Cristina Escarmís;Noemi Sevilla;Andres Moya

  • Test of synergistic interactions among deleterious mutations in bacteria.

    Santiago F. Elena;Richard E. Lenski

  • Punctuated Evolution Caused by Selection of Rare Beneficial Mutations

    Santiago F. Elena;Vaughn S. Cooper;Richard E. Lenski

  • Adaptive Value of High Mutation Rates of RNA Viruses: Separating Causes from Consequences

    Santiago F. Elena;Rafael Sanjuán

  • Clonal interference and the evolution of RNA viruses.

    Rosario Miralles;Philip J. Gerrish;Andrés Moya;Santiago F. Elena

  • The evolution of sex: empirical insights into the roles of epistasis and drift

    J Arjan G M de Visser;Santiago F Elena

  • Exponential increases of RNA virus fitness during large population transmissions

    Isabel S. Novella;Elizabeth A. Duarte;Santiago F. Elena;Andres Moya

  • Extremely high mutation rate of a hammerhead viroid

    Selma Gago;Selma Gago;Santiago F. Elena;Santiago F. Elena;Ricardo Flores;Ricardo Flores;Rafael Sanjuán;Rafael Sanjuán

  • The contribution of epistasis to the architecture of fitness in an RNA virus

    Rafael Sanjuán;Andrés Moya;Santiago F. Elena

  • Cost of host radiation in an RNA virus.

    Paul E. Turner;Santiago F. Elena

  • RNA virus quasispecies: significance for viral disease and epidemiology.

    E. A. Duarte;I. S. Novella;Scott Weaver;E. Domingo

  • Endosymbiotic bacteria: GroEL buffers against deleterious mutations

    Mario A. Fares;Mario X. Ruiz-González;Andrés Moya;Santiago F. Elena

  • Evolution and ecology of plant viruses.

    Pierre Lefeuvre;Darren Patrick Martin;Santiago F. Elena;Santiago F. Elena;Dionne Natalie Shepherd

  • The causes of epistasis.

    J. Arjan G. M. de Visser;Tim F. Cooper;Santiago F. Elena

  • Distribution of Fitness and Virulence Effects Caused by Single-Nucleotide Substitutions in Tobacco Etch Virus

    Purificación Carrasco;Francisca de la Iglesia;Santiago F. Elena

  • Correction: Corrigendum: Variability in mutational fitness effects prevents full lethal transitions in large quasispecies populations

    Josep Sardanyés;Carles Simó;Regina Martínez;Ricard V. Solé

  • EVOLUTION AND DETECTION OF GENETIC ROBUSTNESS

    J. Arjan G. M. De Visser;Joachim Hermisson;Lauren Ancel Meyers;Homayoun Bagheri-Chaichian

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrés Moya
Andrés Moya University of Valencia
Ricard V. Solé
Ricard V. Solé Pompeu Fabra University
José-Antonio Daròs
José-Antonio Daròs Universitat Politècnica de València
Rafael Sanjuán
Rafael Sanjuán University of Valencia
Richard E. Lenski
Richard E. Lenski Michigan State University
Esteban Domingo
Esteban Domingo Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa
Ricardo Flores
Ricardo Flores Universitat Politècnica de València
John J. Holland
John J. Holland University of California, San Diego
Lin Chao
Lin Chao University of California, San Diego
Nam-Hai Chua
Nam-Hai Chua National University of Singapore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Genetics opens the door to multiple healthcare and science career pathways. Many students interested in genetics also consider roles in nursing or advanced practice, since these fields frequently overlap with genetic research and patient care.

Pursuing an online education can offer greater flexibility and often proves more affordable. If you’re looking at advanced practice roles, np programs online provide an in-depth curriculum accessible to students nationwide. For those starting their nursing journey, an online nursing degree is a popular choice due to its comprehensive foundation and convenience.

Cost remains a key consideration for many learners. Professionals seeking the highest levels of nursing leadership may research the cheapest dnp programs to maximize their return on investment. Additionally, registered nurses can find pathways to career advancement and higher salaries by comparing the cost of rn to bsn.

These online options empower students to build fulfilling and impactful careers at the intersection of genetics and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Santiago F. Elena

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles