World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 51 1965 1804 515 450 140 18228

Paul W. Paré publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul W. Paré between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul W. Paré published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2004. 13 of the 207 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2004. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 5 publications
1991 2025

207 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul W. Paré: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 1
1993 2
1994 2
1995 0
1996 2
1997 2
1998 3
1999 2
2000 1
2001 2
2002 8
2003 8
2004 16
2005 10
2006 4
2007 2
2008 8
2009 7
2010 5
2011 4
2012 3
2013 3
2014 7
2015 11
2016 11
2017 7
2018 5
2019 6
2020 11
2021 15
2022 15
2023 10
2024 8
2025 5
Total 207
Download as CSV

Paul W. Paré publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul W. Paré sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 136–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 140 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194 140
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Paul W. Paré D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul W. Paré sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122 51
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Enzyme
  • Organic chemistry

His primary areas of study are Botany, Biochemistry, Arabidopsis, Rhizobacteria and Methyl jasmonate. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Plant defense against herbivory and Terpene. His work focuses on many connections between Plant defense against herbivory and other disciplines, such as Plant physiology, that overlap with his field of interest in Bacteria and Microbial metabolism.

His Arabidopsis research includes elements of Regulation of gene expression, Secondary metabolism and Auxin, Transport inhibitor. His study in Rhizobacteria is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Arabidopsis thaliana, Microbiology, Acetoin, Bacillus subtilis and Cell biology. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Methyl jasmonate, Farnesyl pyrophosphate, Lipoxygenase, Enzyme, Phenylalanine and Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase is strongly linked to Sesquiterpene.

His most cited work include:

  • Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. (1061 citations)
  • Herbivore-infested plants selectively attract parasitoids (1056 citations)
  • Plant Volatiles as a Defense against Insect Herbivores (928 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Paul W. Paré mainly focuses on Botany, Stereochemistry, Biochemistry, Rhizobacteria and Arabidopsis. His Botany research includes themes of Plant defense against herbivory, Terpene and Elicitor. His Stereochemistry study combines topics in areas such as Asteraceae and Coral.

His research in Rhizobacteria intersects with topics in Salicylic acid, Microbiology, Acetoin, Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Paul W. Paré works mostly in the field of Bacillus subtilis, limiting it down to topics relating to Arabidopsis thaliana and, in certain cases, Pseudomonas syringae. His work deals with themes such as Soil microbiology, Bacteria and Cell biology, which intersect with Arabidopsis.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (32.48%)
  • Stereochemistry (19.75%)
  • Biochemistry (14.65%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Arabidopsis (11.46%)
  • Stereochemistry (19.75%)
  • Rhizobacteria (12.10%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Paul W. Paré mainly investigates Arabidopsis, Stereochemistry, Rhizobacteria, In silico and Protease. His Arabidopsis research is included under the broader classification of Mutant. His Stereochemistry study incorporates themes from Human cancer and Coral.

His work carried out in the field of Rhizobacteria brings together such families of science as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Inoculation, Shoot and Crop. His In silico research integrates issues from Metabolite and Enzyme. Biochemistry covers Paul W. Paré research in Enzyme.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • In silico drug discovery of major metabolites from spices as SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitors. (15 citations)
  • Cytotoxicity of 40 Egyptian plant extracts targeting mechanisms of drug-resistant cancer cells. (15 citations)
  • Stem inoculation with bacterial strains Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (GB03) and Microbacterium imperiale (MAIIF2a) mitigates Fusarium root rot in cassava (12 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Enzyme
  • Botany
  • Organic chemistry

His primary scientific interests are in Traditional medicine, Cytotoxicity, Cytotoxic T cell, Rhizobacteria and Hypericum perforatum. His research on Traditional medicine frequently links to adjacent areas such as Genus. Paul W. Paré has researched Cytotoxicity in several fields, including Human cancer, Stereochemistry, Circular dichroism and Coral.

His studies in Cytotoxic T cell integrate themes in fields like Viability assay, Cell culture, Multiple drug resistance, Cancer cell and Molecular biology. His studies deal with areas such as DNA methylation, Arabidopsis, DNA, Shoot and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as well as Rhizobacteria. His research brings together the fields of Phytochemical and Hypericum perforatum.

Best Publications

  • Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis.

    Choong-Min Ryu;Mohamed A. Farag;Chia-Hui Hu;Munagala S. Reddy

  • Herbivore-infested plants selectively attract parasitoids

    C. M. De Moraes;W. J. Lewis;P. W. Paré;H. T. Alborn

  • Plant Volatiles as a Defense against Insect Herbivores

    Paul W. Paré;James H. Tumlinson

  • Bacterial Volatiles Induce Systemic Resistance in Arabidopsis

    Choong Min Ryu;Mohamed A. Farag;Chia Hui Hu;Munagala S. Reddy

  • Root-secreted malic acid recruits beneficial soil bacteria

    Thimmaraju Rudrappa;Kirk J. Czymmek;Paul W. Paré;Harsh P. Bais

  • De Novo Biosynthesis of Volatiles Induced by Insect Herbivory in Cotton Plants.

    Paul W. Pare;James H. Tumlinson

  • Soil bacteria confer plant salt tolerance by tissue-specific regulation of the sodium transporter HKT1.

    Huiming Zhang;Mi-Seong Kim;Yan Sun;Scot E. Dowd

  • Rhizobacterial volatile emissions regulate auxin homeostasis and cell expansion in Arabidopsis.

    Huiming Zhang;Mi-Seong Kim;Venkat Krishnamachari;Paxton Payton

  • GC-MS SPME profiling of rhizobacterial volatiles reveals prospective inducers of growth promotion and induced systemic resistance in plants

    Mohamed A. Farag;Choong-Min Ryu;Lloyd W. Sumner;Paul W. Paré

  • A soil bacterium regulates plant acquisition of iron via deficiency-inducible mechanisms.

    Huiming Zhang;Yan Sun;Xitao Xie;Mi Seong Kim

  • Soil bacteria augment Arabidopsis photosynthesis by decreasing glucose sensing and abscisic acid levels in planta

    Huiming Zhang;Xitao Xie;Mi Seong Kim;Dmytro A. Kornyeyev

  • An herbivore elicitor activates the gene for indole emission in maize

    Monika Frey;Cornelia Stettner;Paul W. Paré;Eric A. Schmelz

  • Induced synthesis of plant volatiles

    P. W. Paré;J. H. Tumlinson

  • The rhizobacterial elicitor acetoin induces systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana.

    Thimmaraju Rudrappa;Meredith L Biedrzycki;Sridhara G Kunjeti;Nicole M Donofrio

  • Jasmonate‐deficient plants have reduced direct and indirect defences against herbivores

    Jennifer S. Thaler;Mohamed A. Farag;Paul W. Paré;Marcel Dicke

  • C6-Green leaf volatiles trigger local and systemic VOC emissions in tomato.

    Mohamed A Farag;Paul W Paré

  • Choline and osmotic-stress tolerance induced in Arabidopsis by the soil microbe Bacillus subtilis (GB03).

    Huiming Zhang;Cheryl Murzello;Yan Sun;Mi-Seong Kim

  • Exogenous methyl jasmonate induces volatile emissions in cotton plants.

    Cesar Rodriguez-Saona;Steven J. Crafts-Brandner;Paul W. ParÉ;Thomas J. Henneberry

  • Flavonoid oxidation by the radical generator AIBN: a unified mechanism for quercetin radical scavenging.

    Venkat Krishnamachari;Lanfang H. Levine;Paul W. Pare

  • Concerted biosynthesis of an insect elicitor of plant volatiles

    P. W. Paré;H. T. Alborn;J. H. Tumlinson

  • Beneficial soil bacterium Bacillus subtilis (GB03) augments salt tolerance of white clover.

    Qing-Qing Han;Xin-Pei Lü;Jiang-Ping Bai;Yan Qiao

  • (Z)-3-Hexenol induces defense genes and downstream metabolites in maize

    Mohamed A. Farag;Mohamed Fokar;Haggag Abd;Huiming Zhang

  • Sustained growth promotion in Arabidopsis with long-term exposure to the beneficial soil bacterium Bacillus subtilis (GB03).

    Xitao Xie;Huiming Zhang;Paul W Paré

Frequent Co-Authors

Guigen Li
Guigen Li Texas Tech University
James H. Tumlinson
James H. Tumlinson Pennsylvania State University
Choong-Min Ryu
Choong-Min Ryu Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology
Thomas Efferth
Thomas Efferth Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Hisashi Matsuda
Hisashi Matsuda Kyoto Pharmaceutical University
Yehia Mechref
Yehia Mechref Texas Tech University
Jian-Kang Zhu
Jian-Kang Zhu Southern University of Science and Technology
David T. Tissue
David T. Tissue Western Sydney University
Joseph W. Kloepper
Joseph W. Kloepper Auburn University
Tom J. Mabry
Tom J. Mabry The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Paul W. Paré

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles