World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marianne Glasius

Marianne Glasius

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
64
Citations
11644
World Ranking
2384
National Ranking
30

Chemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
10879
World Ranking
9865
National Ranking
81

Marianne Glasius publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marianne Glasius sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 203 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Marianne Glasius D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marianne Glasius sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marianne Glasius is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark. Their research spans multiple areas within Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a marked focus on Atmospheric Science, Plant Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Biomedical Engineering, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the understanding of atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, air quality and health impacts, atmospheric ozone and climate, plant nutrient uptake and metabolism, thermochemical biomass conversion processes, lignin and wood chemistry, and indoor air quality and microbial exposure.

Publication venues where Marianne Glasius has frequently contributed include:

  • Environmental Science Processes & Impacts
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • ACS Earth and Space Chemistry
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Environmental Science & Technology

Notable recent papers by Marianne Glasius include:

  • "Screening of common synthetic polymers for depolymerization by subcritical hydrothermal liquefaction" (2020), Process Safety and Environmental Protection
  • "Urban organic aerosol composition in eastern China differs from north to south: molecular insight from a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (Orbitrap) study" (2021), Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Plant Secondary Compounds in Soil and Their Role in Belowground Species Interactions" (2020), Trends in Ecology & Evolution
  • "Natural and Anthropogenically Influenced Isoprene Oxidation in Southeastern United States and Central Amazon" (2020), Environmental Science & Technology
  • "The Aarhus Chamber Campaign on Highly Oxygenated Organic Molecules and Aerosols (ACCHA): particle formation, organic acids, and dimer esters from α-pinene ozonolysis at different temperatures" (2020), Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Frequent collaborators in Marianne Glasius's research include Merete Bilde, Camilla Lind Salomonsen, Simona Radutoiu, Bodil Ehlers, and Ditte Thomsen.

Best Publications

  • The molecular identification of organic compounds in the atmosphere : state of the art and challenges

    Barbara Nozière;Markus Kalberer;Magda Claeys;James Allan

  • Carboxylic Acids in Secondary Aerosols from Oxidation of Cyclic Monoterpenes by Ozone

    Marianne Glasius;Maria Lahaniati;Aggelos Calogirou;Dario Di Bella

  • A review of the anthropogenic influence on biogenic secondary organic aerosol

    C.R. Hoyle;C.R. Hoyle;M. Boy;N.M. Donahue;J.L. Fry

  • Gas-Phase OH Oxidation of Monoterpenes: Gaseous and Particulate Products

    Bo. R. Larsen;Dario Di Bella;Marianne Glasius;Richard Winterhalter

  • Singlet Oxygen Sensor Green®: photochemical behavior in solution and in a mammalian cell.

    Anita Gollmer;Jacob Arnbjerg;Frances H. Blaikie;Brian Wett Pedersen

  • Exposure to ultrafine particles from ambient air and oxidative stress-induced DNA damage.

    Elvira Vaclavik Bräuner;Lykke Forchhammer;Peter Møller;Jacob Simonsen

  • Indoor particles affect vascular function in the aged: an air filtration-based intervention study.

    Elvira Vaclavik Bräuner;Lykke Forchhammer;Peter Møller;Lars Barregard

  • Alginate oligosaccharides: enzymatic preparation and antioxidant property evaluation.

    Mia Falkeborg;Ling-Zhi Cheong;Carlo Gianfico;Katarzyna Magdalena Sztukiel

  • Urban pollution greatly enhances formation of natural aerosols over the Amazon rainforest

    Manish Shrivastava;Meinrat O. Andreae;Meinrat O. Andreae;Meinrat O. Andreae;Paulo Artaxo;Henrique M. J. Barbosa

  • Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in marine fish and blue mussels from southern Greenland.

    Jan H. Christensen;Marianne Glasius;Maria Pécseli;Jesper Platz

  • Continuous hydrothermal co-liquefaction of aspen wood and glycerol with water phase recirculation

    T.H. Pedersen;I.F. Grigoras;J. Hoffmann;S.S. Toor

  • Recent Discoveries and Future Challenges in Atmospheric Organic Chemistry.

    Marianne Glasius;Allen H. Goldstein

  • Increasing Isoprene Epoxydiol-to-Inorganic Sulfate Aerosol Ratio Results in Extensive Conversion of Inorganic Sulfate to Organosulfur Forms: Implications for Aerosol Physicochemical Properties

    Matthieu Riva;Matthieu Riva;Yuzhi Chen;Yue Zhang;Ziying Lei

  • Effect of hydrothermal liquefaction aqueous phase recycling on bio-crude yields and composition.

    Patrick Biller;René B. Madsen;Maika Klemmer;Jacob Becker

  • Continuous Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Biomass in a Novel Pilot Plant with Heat Recovery and Hydraulic Oscillation

    Konstantinos Anastasakis;Patrick Biller;René B. Madsen;Marianne Glasius

  • Measuring atmospheric composition change

    Paolo Laj;J. Klausen;M. Bilde;C. Plaß-Duelmer

  • Dimers in α-pinene secondary organic aerosol: effect of hydroxyl radical, ozone, relative humidity and aerosol acidity

    K. Kristensen;T. Cui;H. Zhang;H. Zhang;A. Gold

  • High-Molecular Weight Dimer Esters Are Major Products in Aerosols from α-Pinene Ozonolysis and the Boreal Forest

    Kasper Kristensen;Ågot K. Watne;Julia Hammes;Anna Lutz

  • Impact of wood combustion on particle levels in a residential area in Denmark

    M. Glasius;M. Ketzel;P. Wåhlin;B. Jensen

  • Organosulfates and oxidation products from biogenic hydrocarbons in fine aerosols from a forest in North West Europe during spring

    Kasper Kristensen;Marianne Glasius

  • Determination of Polar Terpene Oxidation Products in Aerosols by Liquid Chromatography-Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry.

    Marianne Glasius;Matthew Duane;Bo R Larsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Merete Bilde
Merete Bilde Aarhus University
Henrik Skov
Henrik Skov Aarhus University
Allen H. Goldstein
Allen H. Goldstein University of California, Berkeley
Bo B. Iversen
Bo B. Iversen Aarhus University
Jason D. Surratt
Jason D. Surratt University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Andreas Massling
Andreas Massling Aarhus University
Erik Swietlicki
Erik Swietlicki Lund University
David R. Worton
David R. Worton National Physical Laboratory
Rossana Bossi
Rossana Bossi Aarhus University
Zheng Guo
Zheng Guo Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in studying Environmental Sciences in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Many students begin with an accredited affordable online general studies degree, which provides a flexible, cost-effective foundation while allowing them to specialize later.

If you are seeking a program with a balance of accessibility and career relevance, consider some of the easiest bachelor's degree options that still offer strong grounding in sciences and research skills. These programs can be particularly appealing for adult learners or those switching careers.

For specialized technical roles, pursuing a geology degree online provides in-depth knowledge about Earth processes, essential for environmental consulting and resource management careers.

Another growing field is Geographic Information Systems (GIS). An accredited gis degree equips students with skills in spatial data analysis and mapping, critical tools for modern environmental scientists.

Best Scientists Citing Marianne Glasius

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles