World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Avinatan Hassidim

Avinatan Hassidim

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
8170
World Ranking
11934
National Ranking
184

Avinatan Hassidim publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Avinatan Hassidim sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 134 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Avinatan Hassidim D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Avinatan Hassidim sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Avinatan Hassidim is affiliated with Bar-Ilan University in Israel and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, with a particular focus on artificial intelligence, signal processing, and cognitive neuroscience. Their work spans several interdisciplinary domains, including global and planetary change as well as computer networks and communications.

Their research topics cover a range of areas that intersect technology and science, including music and audio processing, topic modeling, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, flood risk assessment and management, hydrological forecasting using AI, machine learning in healthcare, and hydrology and watershed management studies.

Hassidim has a substantial publication record with frequent contributions to major scientific venues. These include arXiv (Cornell University) with 17 publications, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) with 11, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 5. Other venues where their research appears are Nature Communications and the Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

Some recent papers by Hassidim include:

  • Shared computational principles for language processing in humans and deep language models, 2022, published in Nature Neuroscience
  • Global prediction of extreme floods in ungauged watersheds, 2024, published in Nature
  • Flood forecasting with machine learning models in an operational framework, 2022, published in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • Caravan - A global community dataset for large-sample hydrology, 2023, published in Scientific Data
  • Explaining in Style: Training a GAN to explain a classifier in StyleSpace, 2021, published in the 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Hassidim has collaborated regularly with several co-authors, including Yossi Matias, Oren Gilon, Sella Nevo, Grey Nearing, and Guy Shalev. These collaborations have resulted in multiple joint publications, reflecting an active engagement with peers in their fields of study.

Best Publications

  • Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations.

    Aram W. Harrow;Avinatan Hassidim;Seth Lloyd

  • Looking to listen at the cocktail party: a speaker-independent audio-visual model for speech separation

    Ariel Ephrat;Inbar Mosseri;Oran Lang;Tali Dekel

  • Shared computational principles for language processing in humans and deep language models

    Unknown

  • Flood forecasting with machine learning models in an operational framework

    Sella Nevo;Efrat Morin;Adi Gerzi Rosenthal;Asher Metzger

  • Flood forecasting with machine learning models in an operational framework

    Sella Nevo;Efrat Morin;Adi Gerzi Rosenthal;Asher Metzger

  • Broadcasting with Side Information

    N. Alon;E. Lubetzky;U. Stav;A. Weinstein

  • Local Graph Partitions for Approximation and Testing

    Avinatan Hassidim;Jonathan A. Kelner;Huy N. Nguyen;Krzysztof Onak

  • "Strategic" Behavior in a Strategy-proof Environment

    Avinatan Hassidim;Assaf Romm;Ran I. Shorrer

  • Fast quantum byzantine agreement

    Michael Ben-Or;Avinatan Hassidim

  • Movie recommender system for profit maximization

    Amos Azaria;Avinatan Hassidim;Sarit Kraus;Adi Eshkol

  • Adaptive versus nonadaptive strategies for quantum channel discrimination

    Aram W. Harrow;Avinatan Hassidim;Debbie W. Leung;John Watrous

  • Quantum money from knots

    Edward Farhi;David Gosset;Avinatan Hassidim;Andrew Lutomirski

  • Secure Multiparty Quantum Computation with (Only) a Strict Honest Majority

    Michael Ben-Or;Claude Crepeau;Daniel Gottesman;Avinatan Hassidim

  • Stability in Large Matching Markets with Complementarities

    Itai Ashlagi;Mark Braverman;Avinatan Hassidim

  • Explaining in Style: Training a GAN to explain a classifier in StyleSpace

    Oran Lang;Yossi Gandelsman;Michal Yarom;Yoav Wald

  • Personalizing ASR for Dysarthric and Accented Speech with Limited Data

    Joel Shor;Dotan Emanuel;Oran Lang;Omry Tuval

  • TRUE: Re-evaluating Factual Consistency Evaluation

    Unknown

  • The Bayesian Learner is Optimal for Noisy Binary Search (and Pretty Good for Quantum as Well)

    M. Ben Or;A. Hassidim

  • Monotonicity and Implementability

    Itai Ashlagi;Mark Braverman;Avinatan Hassidim;Dov Monderer

  • Topology discovery of sparse random graphs with few participants

    Animashree Anandkumar;Avinatan Hassidim;Jonathan A. Kelner

  • Topology discovery of sparse random graphs with few participants

    Animashree Anandkumar;Avinatan Hassidim;Jonathan Kelner

  • Breaking and making quantum money: toward a new quantum cryptographic protocol

    Andrew Lutomirski;Scott Aaronson;Edward Farhi;David Gosset

  • Thinking ahead: prediction in context as a keystone of language in humans and machines

    Ariel Goldstein;Zaid Zada;Eliav Buchnik;Mariano Schain

  • Sorting and Selection with Imprecise Comparisons

    Miklós Ajtai;Vitaly Feldman;Avinatan Hassidim;Jelani Nelson

  • Secure Multiparty Quantum Computation with (Only) a Strict Honest Majority

    Michael Ben-Or;Claude Crépeau;Daniel Gottesman;Avinatan Hassidim

  • Learning and Evaluating a Differentially Private Pre-trained Language Model

    Shlomo Hoory;Amir Feder;Avichai Tendler;Sofia Erell

  • Movie recommender system for profit maximization (short LBP)

    Amos Azaria;Avinatan Hassidim;Sarit Kraus;Adi Eshkol

Frequent Co-Authors

Haim Kaplan
Haim Kaplan Tel Aviv University
Yishay Mansour
Yishay Mansour Tel Aviv University
Yossi Matias
Yossi Matias Google (United States)
Mark Braverman
Mark Braverman Princeton University
Danny Raz
Danny Raz Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Edith Cohen
Edith Cohen Tel Aviv University
Michael Ben-Or
Michael Ben-Or Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Michael P. Brenner
Michael P. Brenner University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open up diverse avenues beyond traditional Computer Science. For those interested in a strong scientific foundation, reviewing the best online physics degree options is a great starting point. These programs can complement computer science skills and expand your problem-solving abilities.

Data-driven roles are booming in the tech industry. You might consider enrolling in a data science degree to gain expertise in analytics, machine learning, and big data.

For those drawn to technology infrastructure and hardware, the best online electrical engineering programs USA help students build skills in circuit design, automation, and electronics—enhancing both software and hardware knowledge.

If you're looking for a quicker entry into technology careers, there are short certificate programs that pay well. These can quickly boost your job prospects or add valuable credentials alongside your Computer Science studies.

Best Scientists Citing Avinatan Hassidim

Trending Scientists