World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
38
Citations
5357
World Ranking
2376
National Ranking
999

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
6671
World Ranking
8466
National Ranking
3619

Mark Braverman publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Braverman sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 159 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Mark Braverman D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Braverman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - National Science Foundation Alan T. Waterman Award Computer Science
  • 2011 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Mark Braverman is affiliated with Princeton University in the United States and has a research focus within the field of Computer Science, with a total of 49 publications. Their work spans several subfields including Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Economics and Econometrics, and Computer Networks and Communications.

The primary topics covered in Mark Braverman's work include:

  • Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Game Theory and Voting Systems
  • Auction Theory and Applications
  • Advanced Graph Theory Research
  • Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Optimization and Search Problems
  • Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research

Mark Braverman has published frequently in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University) with 22 publications
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl) with 4 publications
  • SIAM Journal on Computing with 2 publications
  • Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation with 1 publication
  • Journal of Public Economics with 1 publication

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Max-Weight Online Stochastic Matching: Improved Approximations Against the Online Benchmark," 2022, Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
  • "The Role of Randomness and Noise in Strategic Classification," 2020, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • "Pseudorandom Pseudo-distributions with Near-Optimal Error for Read-Once Branching Programs," 2020, SIAM Journal on Computing
  • "The Role of Randomness and Noise in Strategic Classification," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Data-driven incentive alignment in capitation schemes," 2022, Journal of Public Economics

Frequent collaborators in their research include Dor Minzer, Subhash Khot, Mahsa Derakhshan, Sumegha Garg, and Amin Saberi. The collaboration with these co-authors ranges from three to twelve joint publications, indicating ongoing partnerships in their research efforts.

Mark Braverman has received awards such as the National Science Foundation Alan T. Waterman Award in 2019 for work categorized under Computer Science, and was named a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2011.

Best Publications

  • Secured Electronic Transaction System

    Philipp Frank Hermann Udo Hertel;Alexander Wolfgang Karl Kurt Hertel;John David Trevor Graham;Mark Braverman

  • How to Compress Interactive Communication

    Boaz Barak;Mark Braverman;Xi Chen;Anup Rao

  • Interactive Information Complexity

    Mark Braverman

  • Dispensing digital objects to an electronic wallet

    Philipp Frank Hermann Udo Hertel;Alexander Wolfgang Karl Kurt Hertel;John David Trevor Graham;Mark Braverman

  • Information equals amortized communication

    Mark Braverman;Anup Rao

  • Noisy sorting without resampling

    Mark Braverman;Elchanan Mossel

  • Pseudorandom generators for regular branching programs

    Mark Braverman;Anup Rao;Ran Raz;Amir Yehudayoff

  • Termination of integer linear programs

    Mark Braverman

  • Communication lower bounds for statistical estimation problems via a distributed data processing inequality

    Mark Braverman;Ankit Garg;Tengyu Ma;Huy L. Nguyen

  • List and Unique Coding for Interactive Communication in the Presence of Adversarial Noise

    Mark Braverman;Klim Efremenko

  • Toward Coding for Maximum Errors in Interactive Communication

    Mark Braverman;Anup Rao

  • Computing over the Reals: Foundations for Scientific Computing

    Mark Braverman;Stephen A. Cook

  • Polylogarithmic independence fools AC0 circuits

    Mark Braverman

  • Towards coding for maximum errors in interactive communication

    Mark Braverman;Anup Rao

  • Stability in Large Matching Markets with Complementarities

    Itai Ashlagi;Mark Braverman;Avinatan Hassidim

  • Sorting from Noisy Information

    Mark Braverman;Elchanan Mossel

  • From information to exact communication

    Mark Braverman;Ankit Garg;Denis Pankratov;Omri Weinstein

  • An information complexity approach to extended formulations

    Mark Braverman;Ankur Moitra

  • Non-computable Julia sets

    Mark Braverman;Michael Yampolsky

  • Monotonicity and Implementability

    Itai Ashlagi;Mark Braverman;Avinatan Hassidim;Dov Monderer

  • Poly-logarithmic Independence Fools AC^0 Circuits

    Mark Braverman

Frequent Co-Authors

Maria-Florina Balcan
Maria-Florina Balcan Carnegie Mellon University
Stephen A. Cook
Stephen A. Cook University of Toronto
Avinatan Hassidim
Avinatan Hassidim Bar-Ilan University
Shang-Hua Teng
Shang-Hua Teng University of Southern California
Ran Raz
Ran Raz Princeton University
Christian Borgs
Christian Borgs University of California, Berkeley
Jennifer Chayes
Jennifer Chayes University of California, Berkeley
Toniann Pitassi
Toniann Pitassi Columbia University
Rafail Ostrovsky
Rafail Ostrovsky University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can broaden your career options after studying Mathematics in the USA. For those interested in combining analytical skills with business, an online MBA can be an attractive option. Some candidates prioritize programs that are known for being the easiest MBA specialization to enter, helping make the transition smoother and more accessible.

Moreover, if flexibility is a top priority, students should consider enrolling in an easy online MBA program, which offers the convenience of remote learning without compromising quality.

For those leaning towards advanced leadership roles in business, pursuing a Doctorate in Business Administration can be a strategic choice. Several DBA online programs make this path more affordable and accessible, enabling students to specialize further.

Additionally, graduates interested in finance can explore the cheapest online master's in finance, providing a cost-effective way to gain expertise and enhance career prospects in financial analysis, risk management, or investment banking.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Braverman

Trending Scientists