World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
12050
World Ranking
4550
National Ranking
2131

Mark M. Wilde publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark M. Wilde sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 254 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mark M. Wilde D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark M. Wilde sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark M. Wilde is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research is primarily situated at the intersection of computer science and physics, with a focused contribution to quantum information science.

The scientist's work spans major fields including Computer Science and Physics and Astronomy. Within these, key subfields feature prominently:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Hardware and Architecture

The main topics addressed in their research are:

  • Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
  • Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
  • Neural Networks and Applications
  • Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata

Their scholarly output includes publications in several high-profile venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Physical Review A
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
  • Quantum
  • Physical Review Letters

Among recent published papers authored or co-authored by Mark M. Wilde are:

  • "Amortized channel divergence for asymptotic quantum channel discrimination," 2020, Letters in Mathematical Physics
  • "Efficiently Computable Bounds for Magic State Distillation," 2020, Physical Review Letters
  • "Principles of Quantum Communication Theory: A Modern Approach," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Cost of Quantum Entanglement Simplified," 2020, Physical Review Letters
  • "Quantum Algorithm for Petz Recovery Channels and Pretty Good Measurements," 2022, Physical Review Letters

Collaboration forms a significant aspect of their research environment, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Dhrumil Patel
  • Theshani Nuradha
  • Soorya Rethinasamy
  • Ludovico Lami
  • Hemant K. Mishra

Best Publications

  • Quantum Information Theory

    Mark M. Wilde

  • Strong Converse for the Classical Capacity of Entanglement-Breaking and Hadamard Channels via a Sandwiched Rényi Relative Entropy

    Mark M. Wilde;Andreas Winter;Andreas Winter;Dong Yang;Dong Yang

  • Fundamental rate-loss tradeoff for optical quantum key distribution.

    Masahiro Takeoka;Masahiro Takeoka;Saikat Guha;Mark M. Wilde

  • From Classical to Quantum Shannon Theory

    Mark M. Wilde

  • Universal Recovery Maps and Approximate Sufficiency of Quantum Relative Entropy

    Marius Junge;Renato Renner;David Sutter;Mark M. Wilde

  • Strong Converse Exponents for a Quantum Channel Discrimination Problem and Quantum-Feedback-Assisted Communication

    Tom Cooney;Milán Mosonyi;Milán Mosonyi;Mark M. Wilde

  • Converse Bounds for Private Communication Over Quantum Channels

    Mark M. Wilde;Marco Tomamichel;Mario Berta

  • Quantifying the magic of quantum channels

    Xin Wang;Xin Wang;Mark M Wilde;Yuan Su

  • Optimal entanglement formulas for entanglement-assisted quantum coding

    Mark M. Wilde;Todd A. Brun

  • Noise and disturbance in quantum measurements: an information-theoretic approach.

    Francesco Buscemi;Michael J. W. Hall;Masanao Ozawa;Mark M. Wilde

  • Polar Codes for Classical-Quantum Channels

    M. M. Wilde;S. Guha

  • Recoverability in quantum information theory

    Mark Wilde

  • Approaches for approximate additivity of the Holevo information of quantum channels

    Felix Leditzky;Eneet Kaur;Nilanjana Datta;Mark M. Wilde

  • Rényi generalizations of the conditional quantum mutual information

    Mario Berta;Kaushik P. Seshadreesan;Mark M. Wilde

  • Resource theory of asymmetric distinguishability for quantum channels

    Xin Wang;Xin Wang;Mark M. Wilde

  • Entanglement-Assisted Communication of Classical and Quantum Information

    Min-Hsiu Hsieh;Mark M Wilde

  • Amortized channel divergence for asymptotic quantum channel discrimination

    Mark M. Wilde;Mario Berta;Christoph Hirche;Eneet Kaur

  • Entanglement-Assisted Quantum Turbo Codes

    Mark M. Wilde;Min-Hsiu Hsieh;Zunaira Babar

  • Gaussian Hypothesis Testing and Quantum Illumination.

    Mark M. Wilde;Marco Tomamichel;Seth Lloyd;Mario Berta

  • Efficiently computable bounds for magic state distillation

    Xin Wang;Xin Wang;Mark M. Wilde;Yuan Su

  • Duality in Entanglement-Assisted Quantum Error Correction

    Ching-Yi Lai;T. A. Brun;M. M. Wilde

  • Principles of Quantum Communication Theory: A Modern Approach.

    Sumeet Khatri;Mark M. Wilde

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Winter
Andreas Winter University of Cologne
Saikat Guha
Saikat Guha University of Arizona
Mario Berta
Mario Berta RWTH Aachen University
Siddhartha Das
Siddhartha Das University of Maryland, College Park
Marco Tomamichel
Marco Tomamichel National University of Singapore
Nilanjana Datta
Nilanjana Datta University of Cambridge
Jonathan P. Dowling
Jonathan P. Dowling Louisiana State University
Renato Renner
Renato Renner ETH Zurich
Stefano Mancini
Stefano Mancini University of Camerino
Marius Junge
Marius Junge University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related fields and online degree opportunities. Many students consider programs that intersect with computer science, such as online mechanical engineering degrees, which combine computer applications with physical systems. These programs are especially valuable for those interested in areas like robotics or automation.

For students drawn to analytical problem-solving, an online bachelor's degree in physics offers a strong scientific foundation that complements computer science skills. Physics graduates can pursue research, software development, or emerging tech roles.

The tech industry also has a booming demand for professionals with expertise in data. Pursuing data science degrees can prepare you for high-growth careers in analytics, AI, and machine learning.

Those interested in advanced technical roles may opt for an online master’s in electrical engineering degree. This pathway blends hardware and software skills, making graduates valuable in industries ranging from telecommunications to smart devices.

Exploring these related programs allows you to tailor your education and gain interdisciplinary skills that are highly valued by employers.

Best Scientists Citing Mark M. Wilde

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles