World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
39
Citations
5757
World Ranking
8377
National Ranking
2990

Mark A. Weltz publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Weltz sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 142 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mark A. Weltz D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Weltz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark A. Weltz is affiliated with the US Department of Agriculture in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with notable contributions in soil science, global and planetary change, ecology, management, monitoring, policy and law, and water science and technology.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics such as soil erosion and sediment transport, hydrology and watershed management studies, aeolian processes and effects, rangeland and wildlife management, rangeland management and livestock ecology, climate variability and models, as well as landslides and related hazards.

Frequent coauthors include Sayjro K. Nouwakpo, Andrew T. Fullhart, M. A. Nearing, Chi-hua Huang, and Beth A. Newingham.

Publications by Mark A. Weltz have appeared repeatedly in key venues such as CATENA, the Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, International Soil and Water Conservation Research, Earth System Science Data, and Soil Erosion Research Under a Changing Climate.

Several recent papers co-authored or authored by the scientist include:

  • Temporally downscaling a precipitation intensity factor for soil erosion modeling using the NOAA-ASOS weather station network, 2020, CATENA
  • Rangeland restoration in Jordan: Restoring vegetation cover by water harvesting measures, 2022, International Soil and Water Conservation Research
  • Climate benchmarks and input parameters representing locations in 68 countries for a stochastic weather generator, CLIGEN, 2021, Earth System Science Data
  • A strategic plan for future USDA Agricultural Research Service erosion research and model development, 2020, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
  • Inferring Sediment Transport Capacity from Soil Microtopography Changes on a Laboratory Hillslope, 2021, Water

Best Publications

  • Remote Sensing for Grassland Management in the Arid Southwest

    Robert C. Marsett;Jiaguo Qi;Philip Heilman;Sharon H. Biedenbender

  • Leaf area index estimates using remotely sensed data and BRDF models in a semiarid region.

    J Qi;Y.H Kerr;M.S Moran;M Weltz

  • Combining the Penman-Monteith equation with measurements of surface temperature and reflectance to estimate evaporation rates of semiarid grassland

    M.S. Moran;A.F. Rahman;J.C. Washburne;D.C. Goodrich

  • The first five years of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project

    Lisa F. Duriancik;Dale Bucks;James P. Dobrowolski;Tom Drewes

  • First order surface roughness correction of active microwave observations for estimating soil moisture

    T. J. Jackson;H. Mcnairn;M. A. Weltz;B. Brisco

  • Interpretation of surface flux measurements in heterogeneous terrain during the Monsoon '90 experiment

    D.I. Stannard;J.H. Blanford;William P. Kustas;W.D. Nichols

  • A Rangeland Hydrology and Erosion Model

    M. A. Nearing;H. Wei;J. J. Stone;F. B. Pierson

  • RANGES improves satellite-based information and land cover assessments in southwest United States

    Jiaguo Qi;Robin Marsett;Philip Heilman;Sharon Bieden-bender

  • Comparison of laser and field measurements of vegetation height and canopy cover

    Mark A. Weltz;Jerry C. Ritchie;H. Dale Fox

  • An Interdisciplinary Field Study of the Energy and Water Fluxes in the Atmosphere–Biosphere System over Semiarid Rangelands: Description and Some Preliminary Results

    W. P. Kustas;T. J. Jackson;T. J. Schmugge;R. Parry

  • Hydraulic Roughness Coefficients for Native Rangelands

    Mark A. Weltz;Awadis B. Arslan;Leonard J. Lane

  • Assessing the performance of structure-from-motion photogrammetry and terrestrial LiDAR for reconstructing soil surface microtopography of naturally vegetated plots

    Sayjro Kossi Nouwakpo;Mark A. Weltz;Kenneth McGwire

  • Simulating Surface Energy Fluxes and Radiometric Surface Temperatures for Two Arid Vegetation Communities Using the SHAW Model

    G. N. Flerchinger;W. P. Kustas;M. A. Weltz

  • Rangeland experiments to parameterize the water erosion prediction project model: vegetation canopy cover effects

    J.R. Simanton;M.A. Weltz;H.D. Larsen

  • Variability of emissivity and surface temperature over a sparsely vegetated surface

    K. S. Humes;W. P. Kustas;M. S. Moran;W. D. Nichols

  • Influence of abiotic and biotic factors in measuring and modeling soil erosion on rangelands: state of knowledge.

    M.A. Weltz;M.R. Kidwell;H.D. Fox

  • Local energy flux estimates for unstable conditions using variance data in semiarid rangelands

    William P. Kustas;J.H. Blanford;D.I. Stannard;C.S.T. Daughtry

  • Evaluation of hydrologic parameters in a semiarid rangeland using remotely sensed spectral data

    M. S. Moran;T. R. Clarke;W. P. Kustas;M. Weltz

  • MEASURING CANOPY STRUCTURE WITH AN AIRBORNE LASER ALTIMETER

    J. C. Ritchie;D. L. Evans;D. Jacobs;J. H. Everitt

  • Relationships between Evaporative Fraction and Remotely Sensed Vegetation Index and Microwave Brightness Temperature for Semiarid Rangelands

    W. P. Kustas;T. J. Schmugge;K. S. Humes;T. J. Jackson

  • Concentrated flow erodibility for physically based erosion models: Temporal variability in disturbed and undisturbed rangelands

    Osama Z. Al-Hamdan;Osama Z. Al-Hamdan;Frederick B. Pierson;Mark A. Nearing;C. Jason Williams

  • Rangeland Hydrology and Erosion Model

    Mark Nearing;Fred Pierson;Mariano Hernandez;Osama Al-Hamdan

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick B. Pierson
Frederick B. Pierson Agricultural Research Service
Mark A. Nearing
Mark A. Nearing Agricultural Research Service
David C. Goodrich
David C. Goodrich US Department of Agriculture
Jan Boll
Jan Boll Washington State University
William P. Kustas
William P. Kustas Agricultural Research Service
M.S. Moran
M.S. Moran Agricultural Research Service
Thomas J. Jackson
Thomas J. Jackson Agricultural Research Service
Jiaguo Qi
Jiaguo Qi Michigan State University
Thomas J. Schmugge
Thomas J. Schmugge New Mexico State University
Jerry C. Ritchie
Jerry C. Ritchie Agricultural Research Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Those seeking flexible study options may find programs listed under easiest bachelor's degree to get helpful as a starting point to identify programs with manageable course loads and practical content.

Specializations such as geology play a crucial role in understanding environmental processes. Online options like the online geology degree offer in-depth knowledge of earth sciences, supporting careers in environmental consulting and natural resource management.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are increasingly essential for environmental analysis and planning. Top-tier programs listed under best gis graduate programs provide advanced training in mapping and spatial data management, making graduates highly competitive in the job market.

For those interested in public administration within environmental sectors, pursuing a focused degree from the best online mpa programs can enhance leadership skills and policy understanding, empowering professionals to effect meaningful change in environmental governance.

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. Weltz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles