World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
90
Citations
27359
World Ranking
12285
National Ranking
6292

Jack E. Henningfield publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack E. Henningfield sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 400 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jack E. Henningfield D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack E. Henningfield sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jack E. Henningfield is affiliated with the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with particular specialization in Pharmacology, Organic Chemistry, Biochemistry, Clinical Psychology, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The scientist's work spans multiple main topics, including chemical synthesis and alkaloids, alkaloids' synthesis and pharmacology, traditional and medicinal uses of Annonaceae, psychedelics and drug studies, neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, smoking behavior and cessation, and sleep and related disorders.

Jack E. Henningfield has published extensively in several scientific venues. The frequent publication venues include:

  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Neuropharmacology
  • Frontiers in Pharmacology
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology

The following are selected recent papers authored by or involving Jack E. Henningfield, with titles, publication years, and venues:

  • Understanding Kratom Use: A Guide for Healthcare Providers, 2022, Frontiers in Pharmacology
  • Psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy to treat psychiatric and existential distress in life-threatening medical illnesses and palliative care, 2022, Neuropharmacology
  • Policy considerations that support equitable access to responsible, accountable, safe, and ethical uses of psychedelic medicines, 2022, Neuropharmacology
  • Psychedelics: Threshold of a Therapeutic Revolution, 2023, Neuropharmacology
  • Abuse liability assessment of the JUUL system in four flavors relative to combustible cigarette, nicotine gum and a comparator electronic nicotine delivery system among adult smokers, 2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jack E. Henningfield include:

  • Albert Garcia-Romeu
  • Oliver Grundmann
  • Ryan K. Lanier
  • Judy Ashworth
  • Sean J. Belouin

Best Publications

  • Blood cannabinoids. I. Absorption of THC and formation of 11-OH-THC and THCCOOH during and after smoking marijuana.

    Marilyn A. Huestis;Jack E. Henningfield;Edward J. Cone

  • A multiple motives approach to tobacco dependence: the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM-68).

    Megan E. Piper;Thomas M. Piasecki;E. Belle Federman;Daniel M. Bolt

  • Establishing a nicotine threshold for addiction. The implications for tobacco regulation.

    Neal L. Benowitz;Jack E. Henningfield

  • Nicotine medications for smoking cessation.

    Jack E. Henningfield

  • The development of a cocaine craving questionnaire

    Stephen T. Tiffany;Edward Singleton;Charles A. Haertzen;Jack E. Henningfield

  • Nicotine delivery kinetics and abuse liability.

    Jack E. Henningfield;Robert M. Keenan

  • Higher levels of nicotine in arterial than in venous blood after cigarette smoking

    Jack E. Henningfield;June M. Stapleton;Neal L. Benowitz;Roger F. Grayson

  • Nicotine and Smoking: A Review of Effects on Human Performance

    Stephen J. Heishma;Richard C. Taylor;Jack E. Henningfield

  • THE AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE POLICY AND RESEARCH SMOKING CESSATION CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE

    Michael C. Fiore;David W. Wetter;William C. Bailey;Glen Bennett

  • Epidemiology of Tobacco Use and Dependence

    Gary A. Giovino;Jack E. Henningfield;Scott L. Tomar;Luis G. Escobedo

  • Abuse liability and pharmacodynamic characteristics of intravenous and inhaled nicotine.

    J E Henningfield;K Miyasato;D R Jasinski

  • The reinforcing and subjective effects of morphine in post-addicts: a dose-response study.

    Richard J Lamb;K. L. Preston;C. W. Schindler;R. A. Meisch

  • The abuse potential of medical psilocybin according to the 8 factors of the Controlled Substances Act.

    Matthew W. Johnson;Roland R. Griffiths;Peter S. Hendricks;Jack E. Henningfield

  • Pharmacotherapy for nicotine dependence.

    Jack E. Henningfield;Reginald V. Fant;August R. Buchhalter;Maxine L. Stitzer

  • Involvement of tobacco in alcoholism and illicit drug use.

    Jack E. Henningfield;Richard Clayton;William Pollin

  • Health risks associated with cigar smoking.

    Frank Baker;Stuart R. Ainsworth;Joseph T. Dye;Corinne Crammer

  • Nicotine as a reinforcer in human subjects and laboratory animals.

    Jack E. Henningfield;Steven R. Goldberg

  • The Reemergence of Smokeless Tobacco

    Gregory N. Connolly;Gregory N. Connolly;Deborah M. Winn;Deborah M. Winn;Stephen S. Hecht;Stephen S. Hecht;Jack E. Henningfield;Jack E. Henningfield

  • Nicotine serves as an effective reinforcer of intravenous drug-taking behavior in human cigarette smokers.

    Deon M. Harvey;Sevil Yasar;Sevil Yasar;Stephen J. Heishman;Leigh V. Panlilio

  • Cigarette smokers self-administer intravenous nicotine.

    Jack E. Henningfield;Katsumasa Miyasato;Donald R. Jasinski

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward J. Cone
Edward J. Cone Johns Hopkins University
Roland R. Griffiths
Roland R. Griffiths Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Saul Shiffman
Saul Shiffman University of Pittsburgh
Neal L. Benowitz
Neal L. Benowitz University of California, San Francisco
Steven R. Goldberg
Steven R. Goldberg National Institute on Drug Abuse
Dorothy K. Hatsukami
Dorothy K. Hatsukami University of Minnesota
Maxine L. Stitzer
Maxine L. Stitzer Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Edythe D. London
Edythe D. London University of California, Los Angeles
Stephen T. Higgins
Stephen T. Higgins University of Vermont
Lynn T. Kozlowski
Lynn T. Kozlowski University at Buffalo, State University of New York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in healthcare careers grows, many students consider online programs as flexible alternatives to traditional medical degrees. For those exploring leadership roles in healthcare, the cheapest mha programs online can open doors to management positions in hospitals and clinics, without overwhelming tuition costs.

Budget-conscious graduates may also want to review the most affordable online mha programs to compare reputable institutions with lower fees. Similarly, nurses interested in advancing their practice can benefit from the flexibility and quality of the best online bsn to dnp programs, which prepare graduates for clinical leadership and advanced practice roles.

Additionally, future pharmacists seeking online study opportunities should focus on choosing a pharmacy school online accredited by recognized agencies, ensuring a legitimate pathway to licensure and career advancement. By exploring these online degree options, students can tailor their studies to meet both their career goals and financial needs.

Best Scientists Citing Jack E. Henningfield

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles