World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
68
Citations
20250
World Ranking
1854
National Ranking
777

Craig S. T. Daughtry publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Craig S. T. Daughtry sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 243 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Craig S. T. Daughtry D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Craig S. T. Daughtry sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Society of Agronomy (ASA)

Overview

Craig S. T. Daughtry is affiliated with the Agricultural Research Service in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Environmental Science, with a focus on several subfields including Ecology, Environmental Engineering, Plant Science, Global and Planetary Change, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The scientist's research topics are concentrated on Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Soil Geostatistics and Mapping, Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications, Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, and Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Craig S. T. Daughtry include:

  • A within-season approach for detecting early growth stages in corn and soybean using high temporal and spatial resolution imagery, 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Evaluation of SWIR Crop Residue Bands for the Landsat Next Mission, 2021, Remote Sensing
  • Estimates of Conservation Tillage Practices Using Landsat Archive, 2020, Remote Sensing
  • Modeling global indices for estimating non-photosynthetic vegetation cover, 2023, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Geo-CropSim: A Geo-spatial crop simulation modeling framework for regional scale crop yield and water use assessment, 2021, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Craig S. T. Daughtry include Brian T. Lamb, W. Dean Hively, Feng Gao, Philip E. Dennison, and Raymond F. Kokaly.

The scientist's work has appeared predominantly in the following publication venues:

  • Remote Sensing
  • Remote Sensing of Environment
  • ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
  • Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment
  • International Journal of Fruit Science

Craig S. T. Daughtry was recognized as a Fellow of the American Society of Agronomy (ASA) in 2009.

Best Publications

  • Estimating Corn Leaf Chlorophyll Concentration from Leaf and Canopy Reflectance

    C. S. T. Daughtry;C. L. Walthall;M. S. Kim;E. Brown de Colstoun

  • Remote Sensing for Crop Management

    Paul J. Pinter;Jerry L. Hatfield;James S. Schepers;Edward M. Barnes

  • Relations between evaporation coefficients and vegetation indices studied by model simulations

    Bhaskar J Choudhury;Nizam U Ahmed;Sherwood B Idso;Robert J Reginato

  • A visible band index for remote sensing leaf chlorophyll content at the canopy scale

    E. Raymond Hunt;Paul C. Doraiswamy;James E. McMurtrey;Craig S.T. Daughtry

  • Evaluation of Digital Photography from Model Aircraft for Remote Sensing of Crop Biomass and Nitrogen Status

    E. Raymond Hunt;Michel Cavigelli;Craig S. T. Daughtry;James E. Mcmurtrey

  • Acquisition of NIR-Green-Blue Digital Photographs from Unmanned Aircraft for Crop Monitoring

    E. Raymond Hunt;W. Dean Hively;Stephen J. Fujikawa;David S. Linden

  • Estimation of the soil heat flux/net radiation ratio from spectral data

    William P Kustas;Craig S.T Daughtry

  • Validating MODIS land surface reflectance and albedo products: methods and preliminary results

    Shunlin Liang;Hongliang Fang;Mingzhen Chen;Chad J Shuey

  • Remote Sensing Leaf Chlorophyll Content Using a Visible Band Index

    E. Raymond Hunt;C. S. T. Daughtry;Jan U. H. Eitel;Dan S. Long

  • Spectral estimates of absorbed radiation and phytomass production in corn and soybean canopies

    C.S.T. Daughtry;K.P. Gallo;S.N. Goward;S.D. Prince

  • Plant Litter and Soil Reflectance

    P.L. Nagler;C.S.T. Daughtry;S.N. Goward

  • Discriminating Crop Residues from Soil by Shortwave Infrared Reflectance

    Craig S.T. Daughtry

  • Narrowband to broadband conversions of land surface albedo: II. Validation

    Shunlin Liang;Chad J Shuey;Andrew L Russ;Hongliang Fang

  • Effects of Nitrogen Nutrition on the Growth, Yield and Reflectance Characteristics of Corn Canopies

    G. Walburg;M. E. Bauer;C. S. T. Daughtry;T. L. Housley

  • What good are unmanned aircraft systems for agricultural remote sensing and precision agriculture

    E. Raymond Hunt;Craig S. T. Daughtry

  • The use of high spectral resolution bands for estimating absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (A par)

    Moon S. Kim;C. S. T. Daughtry;E. W. Chappelle;J. E. Mcmurtrey

  • Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on growth and reflectance characteristics of winter wheat

    L D Hinzman;M E Bauer;C S T Daughtry

  • Remote sensing the spatial distribution of crop residues

    C. S. T. Daughtry;E. R. Hunt;P. C. Doraiswamy;J. E. McMurtrey

  • Cellulose absorption index (CAI) to quantify mixed soil-plant litter scenes

    Pamela L Nagler;Y Inoue;E.P Glenn;A.L Russ

  • Remote- and Ground-Based Sensor Techniques to Map Soil Properties

    Edward M. Barnes;Kenneth A. Sudduth;John W. Hummel;Scott M. Lesch

Frequent Co-Authors

E. Raymond Hunt
E. Raymond Hunt Agricultural Research Service
William P. Kustas
William P. Kustas Agricultural Research Service
Elizabeth M. Middleton
Elizabeth M. Middleton Goddard Space Flight Center
Gregory W. McCarty
Gregory W. McCarty Agricultural Research Service
Miguel Quemada
Miguel Quemada Technical University of Madrid
Ali M. Sadeghi
Ali M. Sadeghi Agricultural Research Service
Shunlin Liang
Shunlin Liang University of Hong Kong
Hongliang Fang
Hongliang Fang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Jerry L. Hatfield
Jerry L. Hatfield Iowa State University
Yakov A. Pachepsky
Yakov A. Pachepsky Agricultural Research Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career opportunities that often intersect with other fields. For example, professionals skilled in spatial data analysis might explore Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which are vital for environmental mapping and resource management. Many students pursue gis degree programs online to gain expertise in this area.

Leadership and policy implementation are crucial in environmental fields. Those interested in public administration and environmental policy can benefit from the best online MPA programs, which prepare graduates to navigate governmental roles effectively. Find more about these programs by exploring best online mpa programs.

Understanding societal dynamics is also essential when addressing environmental challenges. An online bachelors in sociology offers insight into social behaviors and community impacts, complementing environmental studies. Check out options by visiting online bachelors in sociology.

For environmental educators and leaders seeking advanced credentials without lengthy dissertation requirements, online EdD programs are attractive. These programs focus on practical skills and leadership, with some offering flexibility by waiving dissertation mandates. Explore possibilities with online edd no dissertation options.

Best Scientists Citing Craig S. T. Daughtry

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles