World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
103
Citations
45539
World Ranking
7276
National Ranking
708

Malcolm G. Dunlop publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malcolm G. Dunlop sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 378 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Malcolm G. Dunlop D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malcolm G. Dunlop sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Malcolm G. Dunlop is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant contributions in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. The scientist's work extensively covers oncology and is deeply involved in subfields such as pathology and forensic medicine, genetics, molecular biology, and surgery.

Malcolm G. Dunlop's research topics include colorectal cancer screening and detection, genetic factors in colorectal cancer, genetic associations and epidemiology, cancer-related molecular mechanisms, vitamin D research studies, colorectal cancer surgical treatments, and the impacts of COVID-19 on healthcare.

The scientist has published frequently in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), British Journal of Cancer, International Journal of Cancer, Nature Communications, and British Journal of Surgery. The number of publications in these venues ranges from 5 to 16, indicating a consistent output in reputable journals related to cancer research and surgery.

Frequent co-authors in their research include Evropi Τheodoratou, Xue Li, Susan M. Farrington, Maria Timofeeva, and Farhat V N Din. Collaboration with these researchers suggests a strong network in colorectal cancer and related fields.

Key recent publications demonstrate the breadth of Malcolm G. Dunlop's contributions. These include:

  • Characteristics of Early-Onset vs Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer, 2021, JAMA Surgery
  • Global trends in incidence, death, burden and risk factors of early-onset cancer from 1990 to 2019, 2023, BMJ Oncology
  • Risk factors and risk prediction models for colorectal cancer metastasis and recurrence: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies, 2020, BMC Medicine
  • Identification of novel protein biomarkers and drug targets for colorectal cancer by integrating human plasma proteome with genome, 2023, Genome Medicine
  • Glycosylation of immunoglobulin G is regulated by a large network of genes pleiotropic with inflammatory diseases, 2020, Science Advances

Best Publications

  • Telomere reduction in human colorectal carcinoma and with ageing

    Nicholas D. Hastie;Maureen Dempster;Malcolm G. Dunlop;Alastair M. Thompson

  • Mutations of two PMS homologues in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer.

    Nicholas C. Nicolaides;Nickolas Papadopoulos;Bo Liu;Ying Fei Weit

  • British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults

    Christopher Andrew Lamb;Christopher Andrew Lamb;Nicholas A Kennedy;Tim Raine;Philip Anthony Hendy;Philip Anthony Hendy

  • Runs of Homozygosity in European Populations

    Ruth McQuillan;Anne-Louise Leutenegger;Rehab Abdel-Rahman;Rehab Abdel-Rahman;Christopher S. Franklin

  • Modulation of genetic associations with serum urate levels by body-mass-index in humans

    Jennifer E. Huffman;Eva Albrecht;Alexander Teumer;Massimo Mangino

  • Analysis of mismatch repair genes in hereditary non–polyposis colorectal cancer patients

    Bo Liu;Ramon Parsons;Nickolas Papadopoulos;Nicholas C. Nicolaides

  • Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002)

    Stuart R Cairns;John H Scholefield;Robert J Steele;Malcolm G Dunlop

  • Causal relationship between obesity and vitamin D status: bi-directional Mendelian randomization analysis of multiple cohorts.

    Karani S. Vimaleswaran;Diane J. Berry;Emmi Tikkanen;Emmi Tikkanen;Stefan Pilz;Stefan Pilz

  • The interleukin-6 receptor as a target for prevention of coronary heart disease: a mendelian randomisation analysis.

    D I Swerdlow;M V Holmes;K B Kuchenbaecker

  • Long-term effect of aspirin on cancer risk in carriers of hereditary colorectal cancer: an analysis from the CAPP2 randomised controlled trial

    John Burn;Anne Marie Gerdes;Finlay MacRae;Jukka Pekka Mecklin

  • Genome-wide association analyses identify 18 new loci associated with serum urate concentrations

    Anna Köttgen;Anna Köttgen;Eva Albrecht;Alexander Teumer;Veronique Vitart

  • Genome-wide association scan identifies a colorectal cancer susceptibility locus on chromosome 8q24

    Brent W. Zanke;Celia M.T. Greenwood;Celia M.T. Greenwood;Jagadish Rangrej;Rafal Kustra;Rafal Kustra

  • Cancer Risk Associated with Germline DNA Mismatch Repair Gene Mutations

    Malcolm G. Dunlop;Susan M. Farrington;Susan M. Farrington;Andrew D. Carothers;Andrew H. Wyllie

  • Genome-wide association scan identifies a colorectal cancer susceptibility locus on 11q23 and replicates risk loci at 8q24 and 18q21.

    Albert Tenesa;Susan M Farrington;James G D Prendergast;Mary E Porteous

  • A genome-wide association study identifies colorectal cancer susceptibility loci on chromosomes 10p14 and 8q23.3

    Ian P.M. Tomlinson;Emily Webb;Luis Carvajal-Carmona;Peter Broderick

  • Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies four new susceptibility loci for colorectal cancer

    Richard S. Houlston;Emily Webb;Peter Broderick;Alan M. Pittman

  • Identification and Survival of Carriers of Mutations in DNA Mismatch-Repair Genes in Colon Cancer

    Rebecca A Barnetson;Albert Tenesa;Susan M Farrington;Iain D Nicholl

  • New insights into the aetiology of colorectal cancer from genome-wide association studies

    Albert Tenesa;Malcolm G Dunlop

  • Genetic instability occurs in the majority of young patients with colorectal cancer

    Bo Liu;Susan M. Farrington;Gloria M. Petersen;Stanley R. Hamilton

  • Long-term effect of aspirin on cancer risk in carriers of hereditary colorectal cancer

    John Burn;Anne-Marie Gerdes;Finlay Macrae;Jukka-Pekka Mecklin

Frequent Co-Authors

Harry Campbell
Harry Campbell University of Edinburgh
Susan M. Farrington
Susan M. Farrington University of Edinburgh
Albert Tenesa
Albert Tenesa University of Edinburgh
Ian Tomlinson
Ian Tomlinson University of Oxford
Richard S. Houlston
Richard S. Houlston Institute of Cancer Research
Evropi Theodoratou
Evropi Theodoratou University of Edinburgh
Lina Zgaga
Lina Zgaga Trinity College Dublin
Lauri A. Aaltonen
Lauri A. Aaltonen University of Helsinki
David J. Kerr
David J. Kerr University of Oxford
Caroline Hayward
Caroline Hayward University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in the medical field can open up diverse and flexible career pathways. If you are seeking a direct path to advanced nursing, consider the shortest dnp programs online. These programs are ideal for professionals looking to fast-track their entry into leadership or advanced practice roles.

For those prioritizing flexibility, a variety of dnp programs online offer coursework designed for working nurses, with some options focused on a smoother and more accessible learning experience.

If you’re new to nursing or looking for a quicker way to start, fast track lpn programs are available online, allowing candidates to become Licensed Practical Nurses in less time compared to traditional programs.

Additionally, mental health remains a growing specialty. The shortest post master's pmhnp online programs offer qualified nurses the fastest routes to become Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioners.

Choosing the right program depends on your current qualifications, career aspirations, and need for flexibility. These online pathways help accelerate progress for both aspiring and experienced healthcare professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Malcolm G. Dunlop

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles