World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
65
Citations
14583
World Ranking
3127
National Ranking
84

Joanne M. Wood publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joanne M. Wood sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 329 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Joanne M. Wood D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joanne M. Wood sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joanne M. Wood is affiliated with the Queensland University of Technology in Australia. Their research spans several main fields of study within medicine, with a focus on safety, risk, reliability, and quality, epidemiology, physical therapy, sports therapy and rehabilitation, social psychology, and ophthalmology.

The scientist's work centers on topics related to traffic and road safety, ophthalmology and visual impairment studies, older adults driving studies, urban transport and accessibility, glaucoma and retinal disorders, visual perception and processing mechanisms, as well as safety warnings and signage.

Joanne M. Wood has contributed to research published in a range of venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
  • Translational Vision Science & Technology
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
  • Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention

Recent representative papers illustrate the scope of their work. These include:

  • Eye movement patterns and reading ability in children (2021), published in Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
  • Impact of Amblyopia on Visual Attention and Visual Search in Children (2021), published in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
  • Increasing conspicuity on night-time roads: Perspectives from cyclists and runners (2020), published in Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
  • Effects of night-time bicycling visibility aids on vehicle passing distance (2020), published in Accident Analysis & Prevention
  • Validation of Brief Screening Tools to Identify Impaired Driving Among Older Adults in Australia (2020), published in JAMA Network Open

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers. Notable co-authors include:

  • Alex A. Black
  • Kaarin J. Anstey
  • Shelley Hopkins
  • Ranmalee Eramudugolla
  • Scott A. Read

Best Publications

  • Cognitive, sensory and physical factors enabling driving safety in older adults.

    Kaarin J. Anstey;Joanne M. Wood;Stephen Lord;Janine G. Walker

  • Predictors of future falls in Parkinson disease

    G. K. Kerr;Charles J. Worringham;Michael H. Cole;Philippe F. Lacherez

  • Amblyopia: prevalence, natural history, functional effects and treatment.

    Ann L. Webber;Joanne M. Wood

  • Age and Visual Impairment Decrease Driving Performance as Measured on a Closed-Road Circuit

    Joanne M. Wood

  • Do generalized visual training programmes for sport really work? An experimental investigation.

    Bruce Abernethy;Joanne M. Wood

  • The Hazard Perception Ability of Older Drivers

    Mark S. Horswill;Shelby A. Marrington;Cynthia M. McCullough;Joanne Wood

  • The effect of amblyopia on fine motor skills in children.

    Ann L. Webber;Joanne M. Wood;Glen A. Gole;Brian Brown

  • Risk of falls, injurious falls, and other injuries resulting from visual impairment among older adults with age-related macular degeneration.

    Joanne M. Wood;Philippe Lacherez;Alex A. Black;Michael H. Cole;Michael H. Cole

  • The role of cognitive and visual abilities as predictors in the Multifactorial Model of Driving Safety

    Kaarin J. Anstey;Mark S. Horswill;Joanne M. Wood;Christopher Hatherly

  • The development and validation of two complementary measures of drivers' hazard perception ability

    Mark Wetton;Mark Horswill;Christopher Hatherly;Joanne Wood

  • Effect of Visual Impairment on Driving

    Joanne M. Wood;Rodney J. Troutbeck

  • Vision and falls.

    Alexander Black;Joanne Wood

  • Standard measures of visual acuity do not predict drivers' recognition performance under day or night conditions

    Joanne Wood;Donald Owens

  • VISION AND DRIVING: SELECTIVE EFFECT OF OPTICAL BLUR ON DIFFERENT DRIVING TASKS

    Kent E. Higgins;Joanne M. Wood;Alan W. Tait

  • Effect of restriction of the binocular visual field on driving performance

    Joanne M. Wood;Rodney J. Troutbeck

  • Elderly drivers and simulated visual impairment

    Joanne M. Wood;Rodney J. Troutbeck

  • Drivers' and cyclists' experiences of sharing the road: incidents, attitudes and perceptions of visibility

    Joanne M. Wood;Philippe F. Lacherez;Ralph P. Marszalek;Mark J. King

  • Chronological Age and Age-Related Cognitive Deficits Are Associated With an Increase in Multiple Types of Driving Errors in Late Life

    Kaarin J. Anstey;Joanne M. Wood

  • Quantitative assessment of driving performance in Parkinson’s disease

    Joanne Wood;Charles Worringham;Graham Kerr;Kerry Mallon

  • Inferior Field Loss Increases Rate of Falls in Older Adults with Glaucoma

    Alexander A. Black;Joanne M. Wood;Jan E. Lovie-Kitchin

  • Can the anticipatory skills of experts be learned by novices

    Bruce Abernethy;Joanne M. Wood;Sheri Parks

  • Effects of Age and Illumination on Night Driving: A Road Test

    D. Alfred Owens;Joanne M. Wood;Justin M. Owens

  • Effects of age and auditory and visual dual tasks on closed-road driving performance.

    Alex Chaparro;Joanne M. Wood;Trent Carberry

Frequent Co-Authors

Kaarin J. Anstey
Kaarin J. Anstey University of New South Wales
Cynthia Owsley
Cynthia Owsley University of Alabama at Birmingham
Gerald McGwin
Gerald McGwin University of Alabama at Birmingham
Mark S. Horswill
Mark S. Horswill University of Queensland
Peter A. Silburn
Peter A. Silburn University of Queensland
Nancy A. Pachana
Nancy A. Pachana University of Queensland
Stephen R. Lord
Stephen R. Lord University of New South Wales
Louise Hickson
Louise Hickson University of Queensland
Allison M. McKendrick
Allison M. McKendrick University of Melbourne
Bruce Abernethy
Bruce Abernethy University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens many exciting doors, but it’s worth considering how online degrees and certifications can fit into your educational journey. Many students look for the most profitable degrees to boost their career prospects in fields related to neuroscience, including psychology, biology, or health sciences.

For those concerned about cost, attending one of the cheapest online colleges that accept fafsa can make education more affordable, especially for international or non-traditional students. This helps students pursue their goals without overwhelming financial burden.

If you’re seeking a quicker entry into the workforce, consider online certification courses in fields like data analysis, lab technology, or healthcare support. These certifications are valuable stepping stones for neuroscience-related job opportunities and can often be earned in less time than a full degree.

Not everyone wants a challenging path; some may opt for the easiest online degree options to gain credentials while balancing work or personal commitments. Whether you’re interested in a demanding technical track or a more flexible learning path, a blend of online degrees and certifications can open up rewarding neuroscience career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Joanne M. Wood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles