World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
31665
World Ranking
10502
National Ranking
1005

Lynn Rochester publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynn Rochester sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 435 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Lynn Rochester D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lynn Rochester sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lynn Rochester is affiliated with Newcastle University in the United Kingdom and conducts research primarily in the fields of medicine and health professions. Their work spans multiple subfields, including physical therapy, sports therapy and rehabilitation, neurology, psychiatry and mental health, rehabilitation, and general health professions.

The research topics that Raleigh's work engages with cover a range of areas related to mobility and neurological health. These include:

  • Balance, gait, and falls prevention
  • Cerebral palsy and movement disorders
  • Parkinson's disease mechanisms and treatments
  • Stroke rehabilitation and recovery
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Dementia and cognitive impairment research
  • Diabetic foot ulcer assessment and management

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Long-term unsupervised mobility assessment in movement disorders" (2020) published in The Lancet Neurology
  • "Developing a roadmap to improve trial delivery for under-served groups: results from a UK multi-stakeholder process" (2020) published in Trials
  • "Resistance exercise as a treatment for sarcopenia: prescription and delivery" (2022) published in Age and Ageing
  • "Research with older people in a world with COVID-19: identification of current and future priorities, challenges and opportunities" (2020) published in Age and Ageing
  • "A Roadmap to Inform Development, Validation and Approval of Digital Mobility Outcomes: The Mobilise-D Approach" (2020) published in Digital Biomarkers

Lynn frequently collaborates with other researchers including Silvia Del Din, Lisa Alcock, Alison J. Yarnall, Walter Maetzler, and Clemens Becker.

Their research is commonly published in venues such as Sensors, Alzheimer's & Dementia, Movement Disorders, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and BMJ Open, with significant contributions in journals relevant to neurological medicine and rehabilitation.

Best Publications

  • Exercise for improving balance in older people

    Tracey E Howe;Lynn Rochester;Fiona Neil;Dawn A Skelton

  • Cueing training in the home improves gait-related mobility in Parkinson’s disease: the RESCUE trial

    A. Nieuwboer;G. J. Kwakkel;L. Rochester;D. Jones

  • Community ambulation after stroke: how important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive?

    Susan E Lord;Kathryn McPherson;Harry K McNaughton;Lynn Rochester

  • Reliability of the new freezing of gait questionnaire: Agreement between patients with Parkinson's disease and their carers

    Alice Nieuwboer;Lynn Rochester;Talia Herman;Wim Vandenberghe

  • Accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect sensor for measuring movement in people with Parkinson’s disease

    Brook Galna;Gillian Barry;Daniel Jackson;Dadirayi Mhiripiri

  • Effects of external rhythmical cueing on gait in patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review

    I Lim;E van Wegen;C de Goede;M Deutekom

  • Motoric cognitive risk syndrome: Multicountry prevalence and dementia risk

    Joe Verghese;Cedric Annweiler;Emmeline Ayers;Nir Barzilai

  • Addition of a non-immersive virtual reality component to treadmill training to reduce fall risk in older adults (V-TIME): a randomised controlled trial

    Anat Mirelman;Anat Mirelman;Lynn Rochester;Inbal Maidan;Silvia Del Din

  • Attending to the task: interference effects of functional tasks on walking in Parkinson's disease and the roles of cognition, depression, fatigue, and balance.

    Lynn Rochester;Victoria Hetherington;Diana Jones;Alice Nieuwboer

  • Independent Domains of Gait in Older Adults and Associated Motor and Nonmotor Attributes: Validation of a Factor Analysis Approach

    Sue Lord;Brook Galna;Joe Verghese;Shirley Coleman

  • Motor learning in Parkinson's disease: limitations and potential for rehabilitation

    Alice Nieuwboer;Lynn Rochester;Liesbeth Müncks;Stephan P. Swinnen

  • Virtual reality for rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease

    Kim Dockx;Esther M.J. Bekkers;Veerle Van den Bergh;Pieter Ginis

  • The role of exergaming in Parkinson’s disease rehabilitation: a systematic review of the evidence

    Gillian Barry;Brook Galna;Lynn Rochester

  • Are behavioral interventions effective in increasing physical activity at 12 to 36 months in adults aged 55 to 70 years? a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Nicola Z Hobbs;Alan Godfrey;Jose Lara;Linda Errington

  • The effect of external rhythmic cues (auditory and visual) on walking during a functional task in homes of people with Parkinson's disease.

    Lynn Rochester;Victoria Hetherington;Diana Jones;Alice Nieuwboer

  • Validation of an Accelerometer to Quantify a Comprehensive Battery of Gait Characteristics in Healthy Older Adults and Parkinson's Disease: Toward Clinical and at Home Use

    Silvia Del Din;Alan Godfrey;Lynn Rochester

  • Free-living monitoring of Parkinson's disease: Lessons from the field

    Silvia Del Din;Alan Godfrey;Claudia Mazzà;Sue Lord

  • Falls in Parkinson's disease: A complex and evolving picture.

    Alfonso Fasano;Colleen G. Canning;Jeffrey M. Hausdorff;Sue Lord;Sue Lord

  • Moving Forward on Gait Measurement: Toward a More Refined Approach

    Sue Lord;Brook Galna;Lynn Rochester

  • Measurement of Community Ambulation After Stroke Current Status and Future Developments

    Susan E. Lord;Lynn Rochester

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Burn
David J. Burn Newcastle University
Jeffrey M. Hausdorff
Jeffrey M. Hausdorff Rush University Medical Center
Gert Kwakkel
Gert Kwakkel University of Amsterdam
Alan J. Thomas
Alan J. Thomas Newcastle University
John C. Mathers
John C. Mathers Newcastle University
Gary A. Ford
Gary A. Ford University of Oxford
Nir Giladi
Nir Giladi Tel Aviv University
Christopher D. Buckley
Christopher D. Buckley University of Oxford
Derek K. Jones
Derek K. Jones Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Medicine in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related healthcare careers. Many students and professionals are embracing flexible study options to advance or pivot within healthcare without attending traditional on-campus programs.

For those interested in pharmacy, a 3 year online pharmd program offers a fast, affordable route to earning a doctorate while balancing work and study. Similarly, health information management is a growing field, and you can pursue rhia certification programs online to meet industry standards.

Entry-level opportunities also abound, with options like a low cost medical coding and billing online program providing quick pathways into the healthcare sector. For nurses, advancing your career is more accessible than ever through the cheapest online np programs, letting you specialize and attain higher earning potential.

Online healthcare degrees are making it easier for students to find a flexible, affordable path into rewarding medical careers—no matter where they’re starting from.

Best Scientists Citing Lynn Rochester

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles