World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
6146
World Ranking
7751
National Ranking
26

Petr Hlavinka publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petr Hlavinka sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 104 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Petr Hlavinka D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Petr Hlavinka sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Petr Hlavinka is affiliated with Mendel University Brno in the Czech Republic. Their research focuses on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with particular attention to global and planetary change as well as agronomy and crop science.

The scientist's recent work spans several important topics including climate variability and models, climate change impacts on agriculture, crop yield and soil fertility, hydrology and drought analysis, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, wheat and barley genetics and pathology, and remote sensing in agriculture.

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Petr Hlavinka has worked closely with these coauthors:

  • Miroslav Trnka
  • Jan Bálek
  • Zdeňěk Žalud
  • Daniela Semerádová
  • Josef Eitzinger

Hlavinka has published multiple papers in notable journals. Recent publications include:

  • "Czech Drought Monitor System for monitoring and forecasting agricultural drought and drought impacts" (2020) in International Journal of Climatology
  • "Performance of 13 crop simulation models and their ensemble for simulating four field crops in Central Europe" (2021) in The Journal of Agricultural Science
  • "Observed changes in the agroclimatic zones in the Czech Republic between 1961 and 2019" (2021) in Plant Soil and Environment
  • "Observed and estimated consequences of climate change for the fire weather regime in the moist-temperate climate of the Czech Republic" (2021) in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • "Increasing available water capacity as a factor for increasing drought resilience or potential conflict over water resources under present and future climate conditions" (2022) in Agricultural Water Management

Publication venues where Petr Hlavinka has contributed multiple works include:

  • European Journal of Agronomy
  • The Journal of Agricultural Science
  • Plant Soil and Environment
  • Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • Agricultural Water Management

Best Publications

  • Simulation of winter wheat yield and its variability in different climates of Europe: A comparison of eight crop growth models

    Taru Palosuo;Kurt Christian Kersebaum;Carlos Angulo;Petr Hlavinka

  • Agroclimatic conditions in Europe under climate change

    M. Trnka;Jørgen Eivind Olesen;K. C. Kersebaum;A. O. Skjelvåg

  • Simulation of spring barley yield in different climatic zones of Northern and Central Europe: A comparison of nine crop models

    Reimund P. Rötter;Taru Palosuo;Kurt Christian Kersebaum;Carlos Angulo

  • Application of relative drought indices in assessing climate-change impacts on drought conditions in Czechia

    M. Dubrovsky;Mark D. Svoboda;M. Trnka;Michael J. Hayes

  • Effect of drought on yield variability of key crops in Czech Republic

    Petr Hlavinka;Miroslav Trnka;Daniela Semerádová;Martin Dubrovský;Martin Dubrovský

  • Cereal yield gaps across Europe

    René Schils;Jørgen E. Olesen;Kurt-Christian Kersebaum;Bert Rijk

  • Crop rotation modelling—A European model intercomparison

    Chris Kollas;Kurt Christian Kersebaum;Claas Nendel;Kiril Manevski

  • Temperature and Precipitation Effects on Wheat Yield Across a European Transect: a Crop Model Ensemble Analysis Using Impact Response Surfaces

    N. Pirttioja;T. R. Carter;S. Fronzek;M. Bindi

  • Mitigation efforts will not fully alleviate the increase in water scarcity occurrence probability in wheat-producing areas

    Miroslav Trnka;Song Feng;Mikhail A. Semenov;Jørgen E. Olesen

  • Variability of droughts in the Czech Republic, 1881-2006.

    Rudolf Brázdil;Miroslav Trnka;Petr Dobrovolný;Kateřina Chromá

  • Interactive effects of high temperature and drought stress during stem elongation, anthesis and early grain filling on the yield formation and photosynthesis of winter wheat

    Marcela Hlaváčová;Karel Klem;Barbora Rapantová;Kateřina Novotná

  • Comparing the performance of 11 crop simulation models in predicting yield response to nitrogen fertilization

    T. J. Salo;T. Palosuo;K. C. Kersebaum;C. Nendel

  • Regional climate change impacts on agricultural crop production in Central and Eastern Europe – hotspots, regional differences and common trends

    J. Eitzinger;M. Trnka;D. Semerádová;S. Thaler

  • Adaptation response surfaces for managing wheat under perturbed climate and CO2 in a Mediterranean environment

    M. Ruiz-Ramos;R. Ferrise;A. Rodríguez;I. J. Lorite

  • Development and evaluation of the SoilClim model for water balance and soil climate estimates

    Petr Hlavinka;Miroslav Trnka;Jan Balek;Daniela Semerádová

  • Consequences of climate change for the soil climate in Central Europe and the central plains of the United States

    Miroslav Trnka;Miroslav Trnka;Kurt Christian Kersebaum;Josef Eitzinger;Josef Eitzinger;Michael Hayes

  • Use of a soil moisture network for drought monitoring in the Czech Republic

    Martin Mozny;Mirek Trnka;Zdenek Zalud;Petr Hlavinka

  • Simple snow cover model for agrometeorological applications

    M. Trnka;E. Kocmánková;J. Balek;J. Eitzinger

  • Soil moisture trends in the Czech Republic between 1961 and 2012

    Miroslav Trnka;Rudolf Brázdil;M. Možný;M. Možný;Petr Štěpánek

  • Adaptation options for wheat in Europe will be limited by increased adverse weather events under climate change

    Miroslav Trnka;Petr Hlavinka;Mikhail A. Semenov

Frequent Co-Authors

Miroslav Trnka
Miroslav Trnka Czech Academy of Sciences
Zdeněk Žalud
Zdeněk Žalud Mendel University Brno
Josef Eitzinger
Josef Eitzinger BOKU University
Kurt Christian Kersebaum
Kurt Christian Kersebaum Czech Academy of Sciences
Reimund P. Rötter
Reimund P. Rötter University of Göttingen
Roberto Ferrise
Roberto Ferrise University of Florence
Marco Bindi
Marco Bindi University of Florence
Frank Ewert
Frank Ewert University of Bonn
Marco Moriondo
Marco Moriondo National Research Council (CNR)
Jørgen E. Olesen
Jørgen E. Olesen Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA often leads students to consider related online degrees that complement this interdisciplinary field. For those seeking a more accessible academic start, identifying the what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can provide insight into streamlining their education while staying aligned with environmental interests.

As environmental issues frequently intersect with Earth's physical processes, pursuing a geology degree online offers a practical approach to understanding soil, water, and rock systems affected by environmental changes. This knowledge is valuable for careers in conservation and resource management.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a critical role in mapping and analyzing environmental data. Enrolling in one of the best GIS undergraduate programs can equip students with technical skills to visualize and solve complex environmental problems effectively.

For professionals aiming to influence environmental policy and public sector initiatives, obtaining a leadership credential through the best online masters in public administration can open pathways to impactful roles in administration and sustainable development.

Best Scientists Citing Petr Hlavinka

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles