World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6092 5663 3313 3006 155 11491

Douglas A. Wiegmann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Douglas A. Wiegmann between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Douglas A. Wiegmann published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2017. 10 of the 253 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2017. 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 5 publications
1992 2025

253 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Douglas A. Wiegmann: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 2
1993 1
1994 0
1995 3
1996 1
1997 2
1998 1
1999 2
2000 5
2001 13
2002 15
2003 12
2004 5
2005 12
2006 17
2007 12
2008 2
2009 7
2010 13
2011 8
2012 7
2013 13
2014 12
2015 9
2016 11
2017 20
2018 2
2019 8
2020 7
2021 8
2022 3
2023 10
2024 5
2025 5
Total 253
Download as CSV

Douglas A. Wiegmann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas A. Wiegmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 155 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 155
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Douglas A. Wiegmann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas A. Wiegmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Douglas A. Wiegmann is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Medicine, with significant contributions in subfields such as General Health Professions, Health Information Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Emergency Medical Services, and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology.

Their work addresses a range of main topics including Electronic Health Records Systems, Patient Safety and Medication Errors, Health Policy Implementation Science, Emergency and Acute Care Studies, Chronic Disease Management Strategies, Occupational Health and Safety Research, and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues.

Recent publications by Douglas A. Wiegmann include:

  • Workflow integration analysis of a human factors-based clinical decision support in the emergency department, 2021, Applied Ergonomics
  • Collaborative design and implementation of a clinical decision support system for automated fall-risk identification and referrals in emergency departments, 2021, Healthcare
  • Development and Assessment of the Wisconsin Surgical Coaching Rubric, 2020, JAMA Surgery
  • Usability of a Human Factors-based Clinical Decision Support in the Emergency Department: Lessons Learned for Design and Implementation, 2022, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  • Association of Personality and Thinking Style With Effective Surgical Coaching, 2020, JAMA Surgery

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated extensively with Douglas A. Wiegmann include:

  • Brian W. Patterson
  • Michael S. Pulia
  • Manish N. Shah
  • Demetrius Solomon
  • Megan E. Salwei

Douglas A. Wiegmann's research has been regularly published in venues such as the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Applied Ergonomics, JAMA Surgery, Journal of Healthcare Risk Management, and Cancer. The distribution of publications indicates a focus on human factors, ergonomics, surgery, health risk management, and oncology.

Best Publications

  • The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System--HFACS

    Scott A. Shappell;Douglas A. Wiegmann

  • A Human Error Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS)

    Douglas A. Wiegmann;Scott A. Shappell

  • Disruptions in surgical flow and their relationship to surgical errors: an exploratory investigation.

    Douglas A. Wiegmann;Andrew W. ElBardissi;Joseph A. Dearani;Richard C. Daly

  • Similarities and differences between human–human and human–automation trust: an integrative review

    P. Madhavan;D. A. Wiegmann

  • Human Error and Commercial Aviation Accidents: An Analysis Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System

    Scott Shappell;Cristy Detwiler;Kali Holcomb;Carla A. Hackworth

  • Human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents: application of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification system (HFACS).

    Douglas A. Wiegmann;Scott A. Shappell

  • APPLYING REASON: THE HUMAN FACTORS ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (HFACS)

    Scott A. Shappell;Douglas A. Wiegmann

  • SAFETY CULTURE: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW

    Douglas A. Wiegmann;Hui Zhang;Terry L. von Thaden;Gulshan Sharma

  • The mayo high performance teamwork scale: reliability and validity for evaluating key crew resource management skills

    James F. Malec;Laurence C. Torsher;William F. Dunn;Douglas A. Wiegmann

  • Automation Failures on Tasks Easily Performed by Operators Undermine Trust in Automated Aids

    Poornima Madhavan;Douglas A. Wiegmann;Frank C. Lacson

  • A Human Error Approach to Accident Investigation: The Taxonomy of Unsafe Operations

    Scott A. Shappell;Douglas A. Wiegmann

  • A Human Error Approach to Aviation Accident Analysis

    Unknown

  • Human Error Perspectives in Aviation

    Douglas A. Wiegmann;Scott A. Shappell

  • Automated diagnostic aids: The effects of aid reliability on users' trust and reliance

    Douglas A. Wiegmann;Aaron Rich;Hui Zhang

  • Surgical coaching for individual performance improvement.

    Caprice C. Greenberg;Hala N. Ghousseini;Sudha R. Pavuluri Quamme;Heather L. Beasley

  • The effects of tyrosine on cognitive performance during extended wakefulness

    David F. Neri;Douglas Wiegmann;Robert R. Stanny;Scott A. Shappell

  • Human Error and General Aviation Accidents: A Comprehensive, Fine-Grained Analysis Using HFACS

    Douglas Wiegmann;Troy Faaborg;Albert Boquet;Cristy Detwiler

  • Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.

    Poornima Madhavan;Douglas A. Wiegmann

  • Is the “sterile cockpit” concept applicable to cardiovascular surgery critical intervals or critical events? The impact of protocol-driven communication during cardiopulmonary bypass

    Rishi K. Wadhera;Sarah Henrickson Parker;Harold M. Burkhart;Kevin L. Greason

  • Effects of knowledge map characteristics on information processing

    Douglas A. Wiegmann;Donald F. Dansereau;Edward C. McCagg;Kirsten L. Rewey

  • Assessment of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS): intra-rater and inter-rater reliability

    Awatef Ergai;Tara N. Cohen;Julia L. Sharp;Douglas A. Wiegmann

  • Development and pilot evaluation of a preoperative briefing protocol for cardiovascular surgery.

    Sarah E. Henrickson;Rishi K. Wadhera;Rishi K. Wadhera;Andrew W. ElBardissi;Douglas A. Wiegmann

  • Touch screen performance by individuals with and without motor control disabilities

    Karen B. Chen;Anne B. Savage;Amrish O. Chourasia;Douglas A. Wiegmann

  • Attention: From Theory to Practice

    Arthur F. Kramer;Douglas A. Wiegmann;Alex Kirlik

  • Surgical outcome research Disruptions in surgical flow and their relationship to surgical errors: An exploratory investigation

    Douglas A. Wiegmann;Andrew W. ElBardissi;Joseph A. Dearani;Richard C. Daly

Frequent Co-Authors

Thoralf M. Sundt
Thoralf M. Sundt Harvard University
Thomas J. Overbye
Thomas J. Overbye Texas A&M University
Arthur F. Kramer
Arthur F. Kramer Northeastern University
Richard C. Daly
Richard C. Daly Mayo Clinic
Scott Reeves
Scott Reeves St George's, University of London
Robert G. Radwin
Robert G. Radwin University of Wisconsin–Madison
Walter R. Boot
Walter R. Boot Florida State University
Christopher D. Wickens
Christopher D. Wickens Colorado State University
Jingshan Li
Jingshan Li University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to diverse career paths, including social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many students opt for online degrees due to their flexible schedules and broad program options, making them ideal for balancing work, family, and study commitments.

If you’re considering a career in social work, it’s important to understand the specific state requirements for licensure. For example, Missouri social work license requirements outline the necessary education and supervised experience to practice professionally. In Montana, the process for becoming a social worker in Montana includes accredited coursework and state examination.

Similarly, those interested in Nebraska should review the requirements to be a social worker in Nebraska, which detail the academic and clinical training needed. In Nevada, reviewing the requirements to be a social worker in Nevada ensures you understand both educational prerequisites and field experience expectations.

Staying informed on these requirements is crucial when choosing the right online degree program and planning your professional pathway in psychology-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Douglas A. Wiegmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles