World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 43 4402 4068 748 691 210 8278

Patrick Waterson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Patrick Waterson between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Patrick Waterson published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2017. 6 of the 240 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2017. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 6 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 2 publications
1993 2026

240 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Patrick Waterson: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 2
1995 1
1996 3
1997 8
1998 0
1999 1
2000 3
2001 3
2002 2
2003 2
2004 1
2005 6
2006 3
2007 0
2008 3
2009 6
2010 12
2011 3
2012 12
2013 12
2014 19
2015 7
2016 19
2017 23
2018 21
2019 13
2020 6
2021 14
2022 6
2023 9
2024 12
2025 4
2026 2
Total 240
Download as CSV

Patrick Waterson publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Waterson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 204–213 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 210 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285 210
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Patrick Waterson D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Waterson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300 43
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Patrick Waterson is affiliated with Loughborough University in the United Kingdom and focuses primarily on research within the health professions domain, contributing extensively to occupational health and safety. Their work spans several interconnected fields including radiological and ultrasound technology, social psychology, statistics, probability and uncertainty, safety, risk, reliability and quality, as well as medical laboratory technology.

The main topics covered in Waterson's research include:

  • Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Risk and Safety Analysis
  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Quality and Safety in Healthcare
  • Traffic and Road Safety
  • Safety Warnings and Signage
  • Ergonomics and Human Factors

Their recent papers are published predominantly in Safety Science and Ergonomics, addressing various aspects of accident causation, human factors in safety, and evaluation of risk assessment methods. Selected recent publications include:

  • The big picture on accident causation: A review, synthesis and meta-analysis of AcciMap studies (2020, Safety Science)
  • Human factors and nuclear safety since 1970 - A critical review of the past, present and future (2020, Safety Science)
  • Improving accident analysis in construction - Development of a contributing factor classification framework and evaluation of its validity and reliability (2021, Safety Science)
  • Are accident analysis methods fit for purpose? Testing the criterion-referenced concurrent validity of AcciMap, STAMP-CAST and AcciNet (2021, Safety Science)
  • Testing the reliability and validity of risk assessment methods in Human Factors and Ergonomics (2021, Ergonomics)

Frequent publication venues for Waterson also include Applied Ergonomics, SSRN Electronic Journal, and arXiv (Cornell University). The researcher has contributed notably to the interdisciplinary understanding of safety through publications in:

  • Ergonomics
  • Applied Ergonomics
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Safety Science

Collaboration is a significant element of their work, with recurrent co-authors being:

  • Paul M. Salmon
  • Guy H. Walker
  • Neville A. Stanton
  • Adam Hulme
  • Gyuchan Thomas Jun

Waterson's research integrates multiple approaches to safety, risk, and ergonomics, contributing to both theoretical frameworks and practical methodologies for accident analysis, human factors evaluation, and risk assessment. Their work bridges technical and human-centered perspectives within healthcare, occupational safety, and engineering safety sciences.

Best Publications

  • Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas

    Carolyn M. Axtell;D. J. Holman;K. L. Unsworth;T. D. Wall

  • Explaining intranet use with the technology acceptance model

    Robin P Horton;Tamsin Buck;Patrick E Waterson;Chris W Clegg

  • Systems thinking, the Swiss Cheese Model and accident analysis: A comparative systemic analysis of the Grayrigg train derailment using the ATSB, AcciMap and STAMP models

    Peter Underwood;Patrick Waterson

  • Systemic accident analysis: Examining the gap between research and practice

    Peter Underwood;Patrick Waterson

  • Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety

    Patrick Waterson;Michelle M. Robertson;Nancy J. Cooke;Laura Militello

  • What do applications of systems thinking accident analysis methods tell us about accident causation? A systematic review of applications between 1990 and 2018

    Adam Hulme;Neville A. Stanton;Guy H. Walker;Patrick Waterson

  • Crossing levels in systems ergonomics: A framework to support 'mesoergonomic' inquiry

    Ben-Tzion Karsh;Patrick Waterson;Richard J. Holden

  • Maturity models and safety culture: A critical review

    Anastacio Pinto Goncalves Filho;Patrick Waterson

  • Psychometric properties of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture: findings from the UK

    Patrick Waterson;Paula L. Griffiths;C.B. Stride;J. Murphy

  • A critical review of the systems approach within patient safety research

    Patrick Waterson

  • The use and effectiveness of modern manufacturingpractices: A survey of UK industry

    P. E. Waterson;C.W. Clegg;R. Bolden;K. Pepper

  • A new taxonomy of modern manufacturing practices

    Richard Bolden;Patrick Waterson;Peter Warr;Chris Clegg

  • 'Remixing Rasmussen': The evolution of Accimaps within systemic accident analysis.

    Patrick Waterson;Daniel P. Jenkins;Paul M. Salmon;Peter Underwood

  • Health information technology and sociotechnical systems: a progress report on recent developments within the UK National Health Service (NHS).

    Patrick Waterson

  • State of Science: ergonomics and global issues.

    Andrew Thatcher;Patrick Waterson;Andrew Todd;Neville Moray

  • Ergonomics and sustainability.

    Roger Haslam;Patrick Waterson

  • A Sociotechnical Method for Designing Work Systems

    Patrick E. Waterson;Melanie T. Older Gray;Chris W. Clegg

  • The big picture on accident causation: A review, synthesis and meta-analysis of AcciMap studies

    Paul M. Salmon;Paul M. Salmon;Adam Hulme;Guy H. Walker;Guy H. Walker;Patrick Waterson

  • Human factors in healthcare: welcome progress, but still scratching the surface

    Patrick Waterson;Ken Catchpole

  • Global food safety as a complex adaptive system: Key concepts and future prospects

    Rounaq Nayak;Patrick Waterson

  • A critical assessment of task allocation methods and their applicability

    Melanie T. Older;Patrick E. Waterson;Chris W. Clegg

  • The assessment of food safety culture: An investigation of current challenges, barriers and future opportunities within the food industry

    Rounaq S. Nayak;Patrick Waterson

  • The dynamics of work organization, knowledge and technology during software development

    Patrick E. Waterson;Chris W. Clegg;Carolyn M. Axtell

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris W. Clegg
Chris W. Clegg University of Leeds
Neville A. Stanton
Neville A. Stanton University of Southampton
Paul M. Salmon
Paul M. Salmon University of the Sunshine Coast
Andrew R.J. Dainty
Andrew R.J. Dainty Manchester Metropolitan University
Guy H. Walker
Guy H. Walker Heriot-Watt University
Alistair G.F. Gibb
Alistair G.F. Gibb Loughborough University
Kevin Daniels
Kevin Daniels University of East Anglia
Sarah Pink
Sarah Pink Monash University
Toby D. Wall
Toby D. Wall University of Sheffield
David Holman
David Holman University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to a wide range of rewarding career paths. Many students choose to pursue a cacrep online masters in counseling, which can lead to roles in school counseling, rehabilitation, or mental health services.

Others opt for affordable online mft programs to specialize in marriage and family therapy and provide support to couples and families navigating complex issues.

Psychology remains a popular field, and there are a number of most affordable online schools for psychology that prepare graduates for entry-level roles in human services, research, and beyond.

For those passionate about advocacy and social change, msw schools offer flexible online programs to become licensed social workers, making a difference in communities and healthcare settings.

These flexible online programs fit various lifestyles and budgets while building practical skills for in-demand social science and humanities careers.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Waterson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles