World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5585 5185 576 546 127 13498

Peter Totterdell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Totterdell between 1987 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Totterdell published across 34 years, from 1987 to 2020, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2012. 5 of the 135 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2012. 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 4 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 16 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 4 publications
1987 2020

135 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Totterdell: publications per year, 1987 to 2020
Year Publications
1987 2
1988 0
1989 1
1990 4
1991 1
1992 3
1993 6
1994 2
1995 12
1996 3
1997 2
1998 2
1999 6
2000 2
2001 2
2002 2
2003 2
2004 2
2005 1
2006 3
2007 3
2008 5
2009 4
2010 4
2011 1
2012 16
2013 6
2014 4
2015 7
2016 11
2017 4
2018 7
2019 1
2020 4
Total 135
Download as CSV

Peter Totterdell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Totterdell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 127 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 127
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Totterdell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Totterdell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Totterdell is a researcher affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their work spans several disciplines within the social sciences and psychology, focusing notably on gender studies, experimental and cognitive psychology, developmental and educational psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and literature and literary theory.

The researcher has contributed to topics including creativity in education and neuroscience, flow experience in various fields, aesthetic perception and analysis, media influence and health, media, gender, and advertising, gender, feminism, and media, as well as sexuality, behavior, and technology.

Some of the frequent coauthors working alongside Peter Totterdell include Ligia Orellana, Aarti Iyer, Giulia Poerio, Glyn Hallam, and Thomas L. Webb. Collaboration with these coauthors indicates cross-disciplinary engagement and participation in various research themes.

Peter Totterdell's recent papers include the following publications:

  • "An investigation of the impact of encounters with artistic imagination on well-being," 2020, Emotion
  • "The association between transgender-related fiction and transnegativity: transportation and intergroup anxiety as mediators," 2020, Psychology and Sexuality
  • "Prejuicio sexual relacionado con personajes ficticios gay: Una comparación entre muestras de El Salvador y Reino Unido," 2020, Teoría y Praxis
  • "The Neural Correlates of Emotion Regulation by Implementation Intentions," 2020, UNC Libraries

The venues where Peter Totterdell has published the most frequently include:

  • Emotion
  • Psychology and Sexuality
  • Teoría y Praxis
  • UNC Libraries

Peter Totterdell's research intersects with key areas of gender studies and psychological processes related to emotion, wellbeing, and media effects. The topics of the papers suggest emphasis on the psychological impact of media and artistic experiences, as well as explorations into gender and sexuality within social contexts.

Best Publications

  • Emotion regulation in customer service roles: testing a model of emotional labor.

    Peter Totterdell;David Holman

  • Catching moods and hitting runs: mood linkage and subjective performance in professional sport teams.

    Peter Totterdell

  • Classifying Affect-regulation Strategies

    Brian Parkinson;Peter Totterdell

  • Evidence of mood linkage in work groups.

    Peter Totterdell;Steve Kellett;Katja Teuchmann;Rob B. Briner

  • Changing moods : the psychology of mood and mood regulation

    B Parkinson;P Totterdell;RB Briner;SA Reynolds

  • The Effects of Performance Monitoring on Emotional Labor and Well-Being in Call Centers

    David Holman;Claire Chissick;Peter Totterdell

  • A classification of controlled interpersonal affect regulation strategies.

    Karen Niven;Peter Totterdell;David Holman

  • Complex interaction of the sleep-wake cycle and circadian phase modulates mood in healthy subjects.

    Diane B. Boivin;Charles A. Czeisler;Derk-Jan Dijk;Jeanne F. Duffy

  • The Standard Shiftwork Index: a battery of questionnaires for assessing shiftwork-related problems

    Jane Barton;Evelien Spelten;Peter Totterdell;Lawrence Smith

  • Emotional labour and emotional exhaustion: Interpersonal and intrapersonal mechanisms

    David Martínez-Iñigo;Peter Totterdell;Carlos M. Alcover;David Holman

  • Fuel of the self-starter: how mood relates to proactive goal regulation.

    Uta K. Bindl;Sharon K. Parker;Peter Totterdell;Gareth Hagger-Johnson

  • Emotion Regulation of Others and Self (EROS): The Development and Validation of a New Individual Difference Measure

    Karen Niven;Peter Totterdell;Christopher B. Stride;David Holman

  • Mind-wandering and negative mood: Does one thing really lead to another?

    Giulia L. Poerio;Peter Totterdell;Eleanor Miles

  • An intra-individual test of the demands-control model: A weekly diary study of psychological strain in portfolio workers

    Peter Totterdell;Stephen Wood;Toby Wall

  • Rushed, unhappy, and drained: An experience sampling study of relations between time pressure, perceived control, mood, and emotional exhaustion in a group of accountants.

    Katja Teuchmann;Peter Totterdell;Sharon K. Parker

  • Associations of sleep with everyday mood, minor symptoms and social interaction experience

    Peter Totterdell;Shirley Reynolds;Brian Parkinson;Rob B. Briner

  • Adaptive user interfaces

    Dermot Browne;Peter Totterdell;Mike Norman

  • Affect networks: a structural analysis of the relationship between work ties and job-related affect.

    Peter Totterdell;Toby Wall;David Holman;Holly Diamond

  • Time Frames for Mood: Relations between Momentary and Generalized Ratings of Affect

    Brian Parkinson;Rob B. Briner;Shirley Reynolds;Peter Totterdell

  • Recovery from work shifts: How long does it take?

    Peter Totterdell;Evelien Spelten;Lawrence Smith;Jane Barton

  • Use and effectiveness of self-regulation strategies for improving mood in a group of trainee teachers.

    Peter Totterdell;Brian Parkinson

Frequent Co-Authors

David Holman
David Holman University of Manchester
Stephen Kellett
Stephen Kellett University of Sheffield
Simon Folkard
Simon Folkard Swansea University
Brian Parkinson
Brian Parkinson University of Oxford
Sharon K. Parker
Sharon K. Parker Curtin University
Rob B. Briner
Rob B. Briner University of Bath
Paschal Sheeran
Paschal Sheeran University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Shirley Reynolds
Shirley Reynolds University of Reading
Thomas L. Webb
Thomas L. Webb University of Sheffield
Warren Mansell
Warren Mansell University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

An online psychology degree isn’t just about theoretical knowledge—it's your gateway to a variety of rewarding career paths. Many students pursue these programs with the goal of becoming mental health counselors, a field that continues to grow across the United States.

The journey to licensure involves specific requirements that can differ by location. For example, Oakland mental health counselor education requirements emphasize graduate study and supervised clinical experience. Similarly, mental health counselor requirements in Oklahoma City include passing state exams and accruing a set number of clinical hours.

Aspiring professionals in the Midwest can follow Omaha mental health counselor education requirements, which outline pathways from online degrees to licensure. In the Southeast, those interested in this field can explore how to become a mental health counselor in Orlando to understand regional expectations.

No matter your location, online psychology programs support flexible learning while helping you meet essential educational and licensure standards. Graduates can pursue careers in counseling, research, case management, or further specialization—building bright futures in mental health and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Totterdell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles