World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5309 4925 2902 2629 93 31605

Alicia A. Grandey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alicia A. Grandey between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alicia A. Grandey published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2025. 28 of the 123 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2025. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 22 publications
1997 2025

123 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alicia A. Grandey: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 1
1999 1
2000 3
2001 0
2002 3
2003 3
2004 3
2005 3
2006 1
2007 3
2008 3
2009 1
2010 4
2011 4
2012 7
2013 6
2014 4
2015 11
2016 2
2017 4
2018 4
2019 5
2020 6
2021 5
2022 5
2023 2
2024 6
2025 22
Total 123
Download as CSV

Alicia A. Grandey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alicia A. Grandey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 93 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 93
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Alicia A. Grandey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alicia A. Grandey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Alicia A. Grandey is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States and has an extensive publication record primarily within the social sciences. Their research contributions focus on organizational behavior, emotional labor, and work-family balance, among other topics related to workplace dynamics and health.

Their recent scholarly articles include:

  • "Working While Liberal/Conservative: A Review of Political Ideology in Organizations" (2020) published in the Journal of Management
  • "The acceleration of emotional labor research: Navigating the past and steering toward the future" (2023) published in Personnel Psychology
  • " 'A blessing and a curse': Work loss during coronavirus lockdown on short-term health changes via threat and recovery" (2021) published in the Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
  • "A perfect storm: Customer sexual harassment as a joint function of financial dependence and emotional labor" (2021) published in the Journal of Applied Psychology
  • "Does sleep help or harm managers' perceived productivity? Trade-offs between affect and time as resources" (2020) published in the Journal of Occupational Health Psychology

The scientist's coauthors appear frequently in their work and include:

  • Gordon M. Sayre
  • Vanessa Burke
  • Anuradha Anantharaman
  • Liu-Qin Yang
  • Allison S. Gabriel

Alicia A. Grandey has published multiple works in venues such as:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
  • Journal of Management
  • Personnel Psychology
  • Journal of Business and Psychology

Their research spans several subfields within social sciences, particularly:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • General Health Professions
  • Gender Studies
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Strategy and Management

Main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Emotional Labor in Professions
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

In addition to journal articles, Alicia A. Grandey has contributed to academic literature through book publications. One notable publication is The Cambridge Handbook of Workplace Affect (2020), published by Cambridge University Press.

Best Publications

  • Emotion regulation in the workplace: a new way to conceptualize emotional labor.

    Alicia A. Grandey

  • Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives of "people work"

    Céleste M. Brotheridge;Alicia A. Grandey

  • WHEN 'THE SHOW MUST GO ON': SURFACE ACTING AND DEEP ACTING AS DETERMINANTS OF EMOTIONAL EXHAUSTION AND PEER-RATED SERVICE DELIVERY

    Alicia A. Grandey

  • The Conservation Of Resources model applied to work–family conflict and strain.

    Alicia A. Grandey;Russell Cropanzano

  • The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress

    Russell Cropanzano;John C. Howes;Alicia A. Grandey;Paul Toth

  • The customer is not always right: customer aggression and emotion regulation of service employees

    Alicia A. Grandey;David N. Dickter;Hock Peng Sin

  • Is “service with a smile” enough? Authenticity of positive displays during service encounters

    Alicia A. Grandey;Glenda M. Fisk;Anna S. Mattila;Karen J. Jansen

  • Must "service with a smile" be stressful? The moderating role of personal control for American and French employees.

    Alicia A. Grandey;Glenda M. Fisk;Dirk D. Steiner

  • Service with a smile and encounter satisfaction: emotional contagion and appraisal mechanisms

    Patricia B. Barger;Alicia A. Grandey

  • Emotional Labor at a Crossroads: Where Do We Go from Here?

    Alicia A. Grandey;Allison S. Gabriel

  • Display rules versus display autonomy: emotion regulation, emotional exhaustion, and task performance in a call center simulation.

    Lori Sideman Goldberg;Alicia A. Grandey

  • A longitudinal and multi-source test of the work–family conflict and job satisfaction relationship

    Alicia A. Grandey;Bryanne L. Cordeiro;Ann C. Crouter

  • Verbal abuse from outsiders versus insiders: comparing frequency, impact on emotional exhaustion, and the role of emotional labor.

    Alicia A. Grandey;Julie H. Kern;Michael R. Frone

  • Free to be you and me: a climate of authenticity alleviates burnout from emotional labor.

    Alicia Grandey;Su Chuen Foo;Markus Groth;Robyn E. Goodwin

  • The state of the heart: Emotional labor as emotion regulation reviewed and revised.

    Alicia A Grandey;Robert C Melloy

  • Work-family conflict and work-related withdrawal behaviors.

    Leslie B. Hammer;Talya N. Bauer;Alicia Ann Grandey

  • Emotional display rules as work unit norms: a multilevel analysis of emotional labor among nurses

    James M. Diefendorff;Rebecca J. Erickson;Alicia A. Grandey;Jason J. Dahling

  • Affective states and traits in the workplace: Diary and survey data from young workers.

    Alicia A. Grandey;Anita P. Tam;Analea L. Brauburger

  • Customer incivility as a social stressor: The role of race and racial identity for service employees.

    Julie H. Kern;Alicia A. Grandey

  • Emotional labor in the 21st century: Diverse perspectives on emotion regulation at work

    Alicia Ann Grandey;James M. Diefendorff;Deborah E. Rupp

Frequent Co-Authors

Russell Cropanzano
Russell Cropanzano University of Colorado Boulder
James M. Diefendorff
James M. Diefendorff University of Akron
Deborah E. Rupp
Deborah E. Rupp George Mason University
Allison S. Gabriel
Allison S. Gabriel Purdue University West Lafayette
Michael R. Frone
Michael R. Frone University at Buffalo, State University of New York
David M. Almeida
David M. Almeida Pennsylvania State University
Anat Rafaeli
Anat Rafaeli Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Anna S. Mattila
Anna S. Mattila Pennsylvania State University
Leslie B. Hammer
Leslie B. Hammer Oregon Health & Science University
Talya N. Bauer
Talya N. Bauer Portland State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology degrees in the USA opens up a variety of online learning and career opportunities. Many students are pursuing specialized roles in applied behavior analysis, particularly the Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) path. The requirements for BCBA certification can vary by state and city, so it's crucial to research local expectations.

For example, if you’re considering practice in Indiana, review the bcba certification requirements in Indianapolis to ensure you meet regional academic and professional standards. Those looking on the West Coast should explore how to become a bcba in Irvine for insight into California’s requirements.

Students based in Texas may want to learn how to become a bcba in Irving, while those in Florida should check the latest Jacksonville bcba requirements for guidance.

Online degrees offer the flexibility needed to complete these educational requirements from anywhere. Whatever your location, understanding these pathways will help you build a successful psychology or behavior analysis career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Alicia A. Grandey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles