World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 33 2440 2302 2 2 124 6948

Miha Škerlavaj publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Miha Škerlavaj between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Miha Škerlavaj published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2016. 8 of the 140 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2016. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 5 publications
2004 2025

140 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Miha Škerlavaj: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 0
2006 4
2007 4
2008 11
2009 5
2010 11
2011 5
2012 7
2013 4
2014 6
2015 5
2016 17
2017 11
2018 8
2019 5
2020 2
2021 3
2022 15
2023 7
2024 3
2025 5
Total 140
Download as CSV

Miha Škerlavaj publications per year - data summary

  • Miha Škerlavaj, a Business and Management scholar from University of Ljubljana, has 140 publications recorded across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2004 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2016, with 17 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2004 and 2020, with 2 publications each.
  • 1 of the 22 years in the span carries no publications at all (2005).
  • The rate of publication averages 6.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.7 per year counting only the 21 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 33 publications, 24% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2004-2011: 42 publications (5.3 per year); 2012-2019: 63 publications (7.9 per year); 2020-2025: 35 publications (5.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Miha Škerlavaj publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miha Škerlavaj sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 120–124 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 124 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112 124
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Miha Škerlavaj publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 82 ranges running from 35–39 to 436+ publications.
  • Miha Škerlavaj, a Business and Management scholar from University of Ljubljana, records 124 publications - the 44th percentile of the discipline.
  • 44% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Miha Škerlavaj, and about 56% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 135–139 publications range, and Miha Škerlavaj ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 95–99 publications, holding 122 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 52% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 135–139 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 436 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Miha Škerlavaj D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miha Škerlavaj sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161 33
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Miha Škerlavaj D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 60 ranges running from 30 to 89+ D-Index.
  • Miha Škerlavaj, a Business and Management scholar from University of Ljubljana, records 33 D-Index - the 21st percentile of the discipline.
  • 21% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Miha Škerlavaj, and about 79% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Miha Škerlavaj ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32 D-Index, holding 171 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Best Publications

  • What Goes Around Comes Around: Knowledge Hiding, Perceived Motivational Climate, and Creativity

    Matej Černe;Christina G. L. Nerstad;Anders Dysvik;Miha Škerlavaj

  • Organizational learning culture—the missing link between business process change and organizational performance

    Miha Škerlavaj;Mojca Indihar Štemberger;Rok Škrinjar;Vlado Dimovski

  • Organizational learning culture, innovative culture and innovations in South Korean firms

    Miha Škerlavaj;Ji Hoon Song;Youngmin Lee

  • Authentic leadership, creativity, and innovation: A multilevel perspective

    Matej Černe;Marko Jaklič;Miha Škerlavaj

  • Transactional and transformational leadership impacts on organizational learning

    Hugo Zagorsek;Vlado Dimovski;Miha Skerlavaj

  • Understanding Knowledge Hiding in Organizations

    Catherine E. Connelly;Matej Černe;Anders Dysvik;Miha Škerlavaj;Miha Škerlavaj

  • The role of multilevel synergistic interplay among team mastery climate, knowledge hiding, and job characteristics in stimulating innovative work behavior

    Matej Černe;Tomislav Hernaus;Anders Dysvik;Miha Škerlavaj

  • Hiding behind a mask? Cultural intelligence, knowledge hiding, and individual and team creativity

    Sabina Bogilović;Matej Černe;Miha Škerlavaj

  • Evasive knowledge hiding in academia: when competitive individuals are asked to collaborate

    Tomislav Hernaus;Matej Cerne;Catherine E. Connelly;Nina Poloski Vokic

  • Tell Me If You Can: Time Pressure, Prosocial Motivation, Perspective Taking, and Knowledge Hiding

    Miha Škerlavaj;Catherine E. Connelly;Matej Cerne;Anders Dysvik

  • I get by with a little help from my supervisor: Creative-idea generation, idea implementation, and perceived supervisor support

    Miha Škerlavaj;Miha Škerlavaj;Matej Černe;Anders Dysvik

  • Congruence of leader self-perceptions and follower perceptions of authentic leadership: Understanding what authentic leadership is and how it enhances employees’ job satisfaction

    Matej Černe;Vlado Dimovski;Miha Marič;Sandra Penger

  • Patterns and structures of intra-organizational learning networks within a knowledge-intensive organization

    Miha Škerlavaj;Vlado Dimovski;Kevin C Desouza

  • Perceived mastery climate, felt trust, and knowledge sharing

    Christina G.L. Nerstad;Rosalind Searle;Matej Černe;Anders Dysvik

  • Decoupling management and technological innovations: Resolving the individualism-collectivism controversy

    Matej Černe;Marko Jaklič;Miha Škerlavaj;Miha Škerlavaj

  • Networks for Generating and for Validating Ideas: The Social Side of Creativity

    Sandra Ohly;Robert Kase;Miha Skerlavaj

  • Relationship between Organisational Learning and Organisational Performance: The Case of Croatia

    Tomislav Hernaus;Miha Škerlavaj;Vlado Dimovski

  • Comparative analysis of the organisational learning process in Slovenia, Croatia, and Malaysia

    Vlado Dimovski;Miha Škerlavaj;Mok Kimman;Tomislav Hernaus

  • Are we in this together? Knowledge hiding in teams, collective prosocial motivation and leader-member exchange

    Katja Babič;Matej Černe;Catherine E. Connelly;Anders Dysvik

  • Performance Effects of Organizational Learning in a Transitional Economy

    Vlado Dimovski;Miha Škerlavaj

Frequent Co-Authors

Matej Černe
Matej Černe University of Ljubljana
Anders Dysvik
Anders Dysvik BI Norwegian Business School
Kevin C. Desouza
Kevin C. Desouza Queensland University of Technology
Luk Warlop
Luk Warlop BI Norwegian Business School
Felix C. Brodbeck
Felix C. Brodbeck Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Tim Morris
Tim Morris University of Oxford
Teresa M. Amabile
Teresa M. Amabile Harvard University
Ronny Scherer
Ronny Scherer University of Oslo
Deanne N. Den Hartog
Deanne N. Den Hartog University of Amsterdam
Karin Sanders
Karin Sanders University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Miha Škerlavaj

Recently Published Articles