World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 40 5202 4826 142 128 133 11906

Felix C. Brodbeck publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Felix C. Brodbeck between 1989 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Felix C. Brodbeck published across 36 years, from 1989 to 2024, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2016. 1 of the 145 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2016. 1989: 8 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1989 2024

145 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Felix C. Brodbeck: publications per year, 1989 to 2024
Year Publications
1989 8
1990 1
1991 3
1992 2
1993 3
1994 2
1995 0
1996 1
1997 2
1998 1
1999 2
2000 6
2001 5
2002 4
2003 2
2004 3
2005 2
2006 4
2007 4
2008 4
2009 2
2010 4
2011 6
2012 5
2013 5
2014 10
2015 3
2016 12
2017 9
2018 4
2019 6
2020 8
2021 6
2022 5
2023 0
2024 1
Total 145
Download as CSV

Felix C. Brodbeck publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Felix C. Brodbeck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 133 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 133
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Felix C. Brodbeck D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Felix C. Brodbeck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297 40
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Felix C. Brodbeck is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research spans multiple areas within business, management, and psychology, focusing particularly on organizational and team dynamics as well as innovation management.

The main fields of study for Felix include:

  • Business, Management and Accounting
  • Psychology

More specific subfields of study encompass:

  • Social Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management Information Systems
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Felix's research topics have addressed:

  • Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
  • Product Development and Customization
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Katharina G. Kugler
  • Julia A. M. Reif
  • Eleni Georganta
  • Birgit Vogel-Heuser
  • Sabine Maasen

Felix has published in several venues, with publications in:

  • IFAC-PapersOnLine
  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • Current Psychology
  • Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice
  • International Journal of Innovation Management

Selected recent publications include:

  • BPMN+I to support decision making in innovation management for automated production systems including technological, multi team and organizational aspects, 2020, IFAC-PapersOnLine
  • Diving deep into team adaptation: How does it really unfold over time?, 2020, Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice
  • Being on the same page about social rules and norms: Effects of shared relational models on cooperation in work teams, 2022, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • HOW TO STRENGTHEN A CULTURE OF INNOVATION BY COMBINING VALUES-BASED AND EVIDENCE-BASED INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2022, International Journal of Innovation Management
  • The four-phase team adaptation process: a first empirical investigation, 2020, Team Performance Management

Best Publications

  • Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed?

    Deanne N. Den Hartog;Robert J. House;Paul J. Hanges;S. Antonio Ruiz-Quintanilla

  • Culture and leadership across the world : the GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies

    Jagdeep S. Chhokar;Felix C. Brodbeck;Robert J. House

  • Cultural variation of leadership prototypes across 22 European countries

    Felix C. Brodbeck;Michael Frese;Staffan Akerblom;Giuseppe Audia

  • Group decision making in hidden profile situations: dissent as a facilitator for decision quality.

    Stefan Schulz-Hardt;Felix C. Brodbeck;Andreas Mojzisch;Rudolf Kerschreiter

  • Leadership clarity and team innovation in health care

    Michael A West;Michael A West;Carol S Borrill;Jeremy F Dawson;Jeremy F Dawson;Felix Brodbeck

  • Group Decision Making Under Conditions of Distributed Knowledge: The Information Asymmetries Model.

    Felix C. Brodbeck;Rudolf Kerschreiter;Andreas Mojzisch;Stefan Schulz-HARDT

  • Group diversity and group identification: The moderating role of diversity beliefs

    Rolf van Dick;Daan van Knippenberg;Silvia Hägele;Yves R.F. Guillaume

  • The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision‐making groups: the effects of pre‐discussion dissent

    Felix C. Brodbeck;Rudolf Kerschreiter;Andreas Mojzisch;Dieter Frey

  • Cross-border transfer of knowledge: Cultural lessons from Project GLOBE

    Mansour Javidan;Günter K. Stahl;Felix C. Brodbeck;Celeste P. M. Wilderom

  • Bullying roles in changing contexts: The stability of victim and bully roles from primary to secondary school

    Mechthild Schäfer;Stefan Korn;Felix C. Brodbeck;Dieter Wolke

  • Leadership made in Germany: Low on compassion, high on performance

    Felix C. Brodbeck;Michael Frese;Mansour Javidan

  • Errors in training computer skills: on the positive function of errors

    Michael Frese;Felix Brodbeck;Torsten Heinbokel;Christina Mooser

  • Ethical and Unethical Leadership: A Cross-Cultural and Cross-Sectoral Analysis

    Silke Astrid Eisenbeiß;Felix Brodbeck

  • Surface- and deep-level dissimilarity effects on social integration and individual effectiveness related outcomes in work groups: a meta-analytic integration

    Yves R. F. Guillaume;Felix C. Brodbeck;Michael Riketta

  • The Influence of Social Identity and Personality on Outcomes of Cultural Diversity in Teams

    K.I. Van der Zee;Nelleke Atsma;Felix Brodbeck

  • The Germanic Europe Cluster: Where employees have a voice

    Erna Szabo;Felix C. Brodbeck;Deanne N. Den Hartog;Gerhard Reber

  • Errors in working with office computers: A first validation of a taxonomy for observed errors in a field setting

    Dieter Zapf;Felix C. Brodbeck;Michael Frese;Helmut Peters

  • Information Sampling and Group Decision Making: The Effects of an Advocacy Decision Procedure and Task Experience.

    Tobias Greitemeyer;Stefan Schulz-Hardt;Felix C. Brodbeck;Dieter Frey

  • More than meets the eye: The role of subordinates' self-perceptions in leader categorization processes☆

    Niels van Quaquebeke;Daan van Knippenberg;Felix C. Brodbeck

  • Gender differences in the initiation of negotiations: A meta-analysis.

    Katharina G. Kugler;Julia A. M. Reif;Tamara Kaschner;Felix C. Brodbeck

  • Don't underestimate the problems of user centredness in software development projects - there are many!

    Torsten Heinbokel;Sabine Sonnentag;Michael Frese;Wolfgang Stolte

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Frese
Michael Frese Asia School of Business
Stefan Schulz-Hardt
Stefan Schulz-Hardt University of Göttingen
Dieter Zapf
Dieter Zapf Goethe University Frankfurt
Dieter Frey
Dieter Frey Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Tobias Greitemeyer
Tobias Greitemeyer University of Innsbruck
Sabine Sonnentag
Sabine Sonnentag University of Mannheim
Andreas Mojzisch
Andreas Mojzisch University of Hildesheim
Birgit Vogel-Heuser
Birgit Vogel-Heuser Technical University of Munich
Mansour Javidan
Mansour Javidan Arizona State University
Deanne N. Den Hartog
Deanne N. Den Hartog University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a broad range of online degrees and career options. For those interested in human behavior, a bachelor of science in psychology is a popular starting point. This degree builds a strong foundation for careers in counseling, social services, and business.

Graduates aiming to step directly into social work may consider an online msw program. An MSW opens doors to roles such as clinical social worker, case manager, and policy analyst, often with flexible, online options available for working adults.

For those seeking advanced clinical practice, accredited psyd programs online offer specialized training in psychology. These programs prepare students for licensing and practice as professional psychologists.

If your interest lies in family and relationship counseling, consider some of the best online mft programs. MFT degrees focus on therapy skills for couples and families and can be completed quickly through accelerated online courses.

Best Scientists Citing Felix C. Brodbeck

Trending Scientists