World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
42
Citations
11378
World Ranking
4618
National Ranking
2197

Gail T. Fairhurst publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gail T. Fairhurst sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 88 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Gail T. Fairhurst D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gail T. Fairhurst sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gail T. Fairhurst is affiliated with the University of Cincinnati in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on business, management, and accounting, with an emphasis on organizational behavior and human resource management. They have contributed to fields such as management science and operations research, sociology and political science, and literature and literary theory.

The main topics of their work include management and organizational studies, management theory and practice, complex systems and decision making, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, information systems theories and implementation, and discourse analysis in language studies.

Fairhurst has published in several venues, with a frequent presence in:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Human Relations
  • Organization Studies
  • Journal of Management Inquiry
  • Communication Research and Practice

The scientist has authored notable papers, including:

  • "Studying collective leadership: The road ahead" (2020, Human Relations)
  • "Whither organisational discourse analysis? The case from paradox and leadership research" (2022, Communication Research and Practice)

They also appear as a coauthor on influential works like "Collective dimensions of leadership: Connecting theory and method" (2020, Human Relations), written by Sonia Ospina, reflecting overlapping research interests.

Recent selected publications involving or related to their fields are:

  • "Collective dimensions of leadership: Connecting theory and method" (2020, Human Relations)
  • "A Paradox Approach to Societal Tensions during the Pandemic Crisis" (2021, Journal of Management Inquiry)
  • "Phronetic Pivoting between Compliance and Care: Engaging paradoxes and disequilibrium in organizing risk" (2024, Organization Studies)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Fairhurst include:

  • Linda L. Putnam
  • Sonia Ospina
  • Erica Gabrielle Foldy
  • Brad Jackson
  • Garima Sharma

Best Publications

  • Organizations as Discursive Constructions

    Gail T. Fairhurst;Linda Putnam

  • The Social Construction of Leadership: A Sailing Guide

    Gail T. Fairhurst;David Grant

  • Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Constitutive Approach†

    Linda L. Putnam;Gail T. Fairhurst;Scott Banghart

  • Discourse Analysis in Organizations. Issues and Concerns

    Linda L. Putnam;Gail T. Fairhurst

  • Organizational discourse analysis (ODA): Examining leadership as a relational process

    Gail T. Fairhurst;Mary Uhl-Bien

  • The leader‐member exchange patterns of women leaders in industry: A discourse analysis

    Gail T. Fairhurst

  • Leadership: A communicative perspective:

    Gail T Fairhurst;Stacey L Connaughton

  • The Art of Framing: Managing the Language of Leadership

    Gail Theus Fairhurst;Robert A Sarr

  • Considering context in discursive leadership research

    Gail T. Fairhurst

  • Social structure in leader‐member interaction

    Gail T. Fairhurst;Teresa A. Chandler

  • Discursive Leadership: In Conversation with Leadership Psychology

    Gail Theus Fairhurst

  • The Power of Framing: Creating the Language of Leadership

    Gail Theus Fairhurst

  • Interaction Patterns in Organic and Mechanistic System

    John A. Courtright;Gail T. Fairhurst;L. Edna Rogers

  • Dualisms in Leadership Research

    Gail T. Fairhurst

  • Resistance leadership: The overlooked potential in critical organization and leadership studies

    Heather M. Zoller;Gail T. Fairhurst

  • Reframing The Art of Framing: Problems and Prospects for Leadership

    Gail T. Fairhurst

  • Living Leadership: A Systemic Constructionist Approach:

    J. Kevin Barge;Gail T. Fairhurst

  • Knots in the Discourse of Innovation: Investigating Multiple Tensions in a Reacquired Spin-off:

    Mathew L. Sheep;Gail T. Fairhurst;Shalini Khazanchi

  • Discursive Leadership A Communication Alternative to Leadership Psychology

    Gail T. Fairhurst

  • Collective dimensions of leadership: Connecting theory and method:

    Sonia M Ospina;Erica Gabrielle Foldy;Gail T Fairhurst;Brad Jackson

  • Why are we here? Managing the meaning of an organizational mission statement

    Gail T. Fairhurst;Jerry Monroe Jordan;Kurt Neuwirth

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda L. Putnam
Linda L. Putnam University of California, Santa Barbara
Stephen G. Green
Stephen G. Green Purdue University West Lafayette
François Cooren
François Cooren University of Montreal
Patrice M. Buzzanell
Patrice M. Buzzanell University of South Florida
John Antonakis
John Antonakis University of Lausanne
Wendy K. Smith
Wendy K. Smith University of Delaware
David Grant
David Grant Griffith University
Gudela Grote
Gudela Grote ETH Zurich
Robert C. Liden
Robert C. Liden University of Illinois at Chicago
Tobias Hahn
Tobias Hahn Ramon Llull University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a range of online degrees that can launch or advance your career. Those interested in counseling or psychology may consider accredited online psyd programs, which allow for flexible, high-level training while maintaining professional and personal commitments.

For students passionate about strengthening family systems, marriage and family therapy online programs accredited offer fast and flexible routes to licensure. These programs emphasize accessible formats for working adults.

Cost is another significant concern for many prospective students. Researching how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology can help you identify programs that balance academic quality with affordability, making advanced qualifications more attainable.

If your goals include educational leadership or academia, pursuing the shortest edd program online may accelerate your career trajectory, providing in-depth expertise in less time.

By exploring these diverse pathways, you can tailor your education and build a fulfilling career in the social sciences or humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Gail T. Fairhurst

Trending Scientists