World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 47 1123 1045 11 11 149 20238
Psychology 51 5091 4722 53 51 162 22960

John Antonakis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Antonakis between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Antonakis published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2014. 8 of the 193 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2014. 2001: 4 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 2 publications
2001 2025

193 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Antonakis: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 4
2002 7
2003 5
2004 8
2005 5
2006 4
2007 10
2008 4
2009 7
2010 10
2011 13
2012 10
2013 12
2014 15
2015 13
2016 11
2017 10
2018 9
2019 5
2020 6
2021 8
2022 3
2023 6
2024 6
2025 2
Total 193
Download as CSV

John Antonakis publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Antonakis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 145–149 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 149 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81 149
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

John Antonakis D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Antonakis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69 47
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

John Antonakis is affiliated with the University of Lausanne in Switzerland. Their research spans multiple domains within social sciences and business, management, and accounting, focusing particularly on organizational behavior and human resource management as well as sociology and political science.

The scientist's recent publication record includes work appearing in prominent journals and venues. Key papers include:

  • "COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action." (2020, American Psychologist)
  • "Just Words? Just Speeches? On the Economic Value of Charismatic Leadership" (2021, Management Science)
  • "Common methodological mistakes" (2023, The Leadership Quarterly)
  • "Leadership to defeat COVID-19" (2021, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations)
  • "Effect of charismatic signaling in social media settings: Evidence from TED and Twitter" (2021, The Leadership Quarterly)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Antonakis include:

  • Mikko Rönkkö
  • Sirio Lonati
  • Nicolas Bastardoz
  • Cameron N. McIntosh
  • Anely Bekbergenova

Antonakis' research has been published extensively in venues such as:

  • The Leadership Quarterly
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • European Journal of Marketing
  • American Psychologist
  • Management Science

Their academic work focuses on several main and subfields including:

  • Business, Management and Accounting
  • Social Sciences
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Safety Research

Their research covers multiple topics such as:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Management and Organizational Studies
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Customer Service Quality and Loyalty

Best Publications

  • Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire.

    John Antonakis;Bruce J Avolio;Nagaraj Sivasubramaniam

  • On making causal claims: A review and recommendations

    John Antonakis;Samuel Bendahan;Philippe Jacquart;Rafael Lalive

  • The Nature of Leadership

    David V. Day;John Antonakis

  • COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action.

    Kevin M. Kniffin;Jayanth Narayanan;Frederik Anseel;John Antonakis

  • LEADER DISTANCE: A REVIEW AND A PROPOSED THEORY

    John Antonakis;Leanne Atwater

  • The Full-Range Leadership Theory: The Way Forward

    John Antonakis;Robert J. House

  • Could lean production job design be intrinsically motivating? Contextual, configurational, and levels-of-analysis issues

    Suzanne de Treville;John Antonakis

  • Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extension of transformational–transactional leadership theory

    John Antonakis;Robert J. House

  • Does leadership need emotional intelligence

    John Antonakis;Neal M. Ashkanasy;Marie T. Dasborough

  • Predicting Elections: Child's Play!

    John Antonakis;Olaf Dalgas

  • On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications

    John Antonakis

  • Can Charisma Be Taught? Tests of Two Interventions

    John Antonakis;Marika Fenley;Sue Liechti

  • Charisma : An Ill-Defined and Ill-Measured Gift

    John Antonakis;Nicolas Bastardoz;Philippe Jacquart;Boar Shamir

  • Charisma: An Ill-Defined and Ill-Measured Gift

    John Antonakis;Nicolas Bastardoz;Philippe Jacquart;Boas Shamir

  • Leadership: Past, Present, and Future

    David Day;John Antonakis

  • Considering context in psychological leadership research

    Robert C. Liden;John Antonakis

  • Interpersonal Power A Review, Critique, and Research Agenda

    Rachel E. Sturm;John Antonakis

  • Transformational and Charismatic Leadership

    J. Antonakis

  • Leadership process models: A review and synthesis.

    Thomas Fischer;Joerg Dietz;John Antonakis

  • Partial least squares path modeling: Time for some serious second thoughts

    Mikko Rönkkö;Cameron N. McIntosh;John Antonakis;Jeffrey R. Edwards

  • Leadership and individual differences: At the cusp of a renaissance

    John Antonakis;David V. Day;Birgit Schyns

Frequent Co-Authors

David V. Day
David V. Day Claremont McKenna College
Birgit Schyns
Birgit Schyns NEOMA Business School
Robert J. House
Robert J. House University of Pennsylvania
Rafael Lalive
Rafael Lalive University of Lausanne
Leanne E. Atwater
Leanne E. Atwater University of Houston
Scott O. Lilienfeld
Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University
James G. Hunt
James G. Hunt Texas Tech University
Chester A. Schriesheim
Chester A. Schriesheim University of Miami
Robert J. Sternberg
Robert J. Sternberg Cornell University
Dolores Albarracín
Dolores Albarracín University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your expertise in business and management isn't limited to traditional paths. Many students now choose specialized online degrees that offer flexibility and affordability while targeting growing career fields.

For those interested in leading projects within the construction sector, earning a construction management degree online can open doors to supervisory and executive roles on build sites and within property firms.

Professionals aiming to fast-track their leadership roles often consider affordable online executive mba programs. These programs are designed for working professionals and senior managers who want to enhance their strategic decision-making and business acumen.

If you're seeking to specialize further, a range of affordable online master's programs is available in areas from finance and marketing to human resource management. These advanced degrees help students gain a competitive advantage in the job market.

As data-driven decision making becomes essential, an online data science degree can bridge business management and technology. Graduates in data science are highly sought-after across industries for their analytical and problem-solving skills.

Best Scientists Citing John Antonakis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles