World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
32
Citations
3524
World Ranking
8128
National Ranking
2692

Mark A. Haroldson publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Haroldson sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 83 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Mark A. Haroldson D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Haroldson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark A. Haroldson is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on environmental science, with a substantial emphasis on ecology.

The main fields of study in their work include:

  • Environmental Science

Within this broad field, they have contributed to several subfields:

  • Ecology
  • Genetics
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecological Modeling
  • Cell Biology

Haroldson's work covers multiple topics, with the most frequent being:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Ecology and biodiversity studies
  • Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change

Their recent published papers demonstrate a focus on bear ecology, physiology, and conservation, including:

  • "Thermal constraints on energy balance, behaviour and spatial distribution of grizzly bears" (2021, Functional Ecology)
  • "Quantifying energetic costs and defining energy landscapes experienced by grizzly bears" (2021, Journal of Experimental Biology)
  • "Genetic architecture and evolution of color variation in American black bears" (2022, Current Biology)
  • "Evidence for density-dependent effects on body composition of a large omnivore in a changing Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem" (2023, Global Change Biology)
  • "Potential for recreational restrictions to reduce grizzly bear-caused human injuries" (2020, Ursus)

Frequent coauthors on these and related projects include:

  • Frank T. van Manen
  • Kerry A. Gunther
  • Cecily M. Costello
  • Daniel D. Bjornlie
  • Daniel J. Thompson

Haroldson has also published works across several scholarly venues, with multiple publications in the following journals:

  • Journal of Wildlife Management
  • Ursus
  • Global Ecology and Conservation
  • Functional Ecology
  • Journal of Experimental Biology

In addition to journal articles, Haroldson has contributed to book literature, including a title published by Cambridge University Press:

  • Bears of the World (2020)

Best Publications

  • Population fragmentation and inter-ecosystem movements of grizzly bears in western Canada and the northern United States

    Michael F. Proctor;David Paetkau;Bruce N. Mclellan;Gordon B. Stenhouse

  • Temporal, Spatial, and Environmental Influences on the Demographics of Grizzly Bears in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

    Charles C. Schwartz;Mark A. Haroldson;Gary C. White;Richard B. Harris

  • Use of sulfur and nitrogen stable isotopes to determine the importance of whitebark pine nuts to Yellowstone grizzly bears

    Laura A Felicetti;Charles C Schwartz;Robert O Rye;Mark A Haroldson

  • Grizzly bear–human conflicts in the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem, 1992–2000

    Kerry A. Gunther;Mark A. Haroldson;Kevin Frey;Steven L. Cain

  • Hazards Affecting Grizzly Bear Survival in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

    Charles C. Schwartz;Mark A. Haroldson;Gary C. White

  • Dietary Adjustability of Grizzly Bears and American Black Bears in Yellowstone National Park

    Jennifer K. Fortin;Charles C. Schwartz;Kerry A. Gunther;Justin E. Teisberg

  • MODELING SURVIVAL: APPLICATION OF THE ANDERSEN—GILL MODEL TO YELLOWSTONE GRIZZLY BEARS

    Christopher J. Johnson;Mark S. Boyce;Charles C. Schwartz;Mark A. Haroldson

  • Grizzly bear denning chronology and movements in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

    Mark A. Haroldson;Mark A. Ternent;Kerry A. Gunther;Charles C. Schwartz

  • Diet and Macronutrient Optimization in Wild Ursids: A Comparison of Grizzly Bears with Sympatric and Allopatric Black Bears.

    Cecily M. Costello;Steven L. Cain;Shannon R Pils;Leslie Frattaroli

  • Dietary breadth of grizzly bears in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

    Kerry A. Gunther;Rebecca R. Shoemaker;Kevin L. Frey;Mark A. Haroldson

  • Potential paths for male-mediated gene flow to and from an isolated grizzly bear population

    Christopher P. Peck;Frank T. van Manen;Cecily M. Costello;Mark A. Haroldson

  • Grizzly bear population vital rates and trend in the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem, Montana

    Richard D. Mace;Daniel W. Carney;Tonya Chilton‐Radandt;Stacy A. Courville

  • Distribution of grizzly bears in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem in 2004

    Charles C. Schwartz;Mark A. Haroldson;Kerry A. Gunther;Dave Moody

  • Use of naturally occurring mercury to determine the importance of cutthroat trout to Yellowstone grizzly bears

    Laura A Felicetti;Charles C Schwartz;Robert O Rye;Kerry A Gunther

  • Whitebark pine, population density, and home-range size of grizzly bears in the greater yellowstone ecosystem.

    Daniel D. Bjornlie;Frank T. Van Manen;Michael R. Ebinger;Mark A. Haroldson

  • Cougar Survival and Source-Sink Structure on Greater Yellowstone's Northern Range

    Toni K. Ruth;Mark A. Haroldson;Kerry M. Murphy;Polly C. Buotte

  • Density dependence, whitebark pine, and vital rates of grizzly bears

    Frank T. van Manen;Mark A. Haroldson;Daniel D. Bjornlie;Michael R. Ebinger

  • Body and diet composition of sympatric black and grizzly bears in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

    Charles C. Schwartz;Jennifer K. Fortin;Justin E. Teisberg;Mark A. Haroldson

  • Multiple estimates of effective population size for monitoring a long-lived vertebrate: an application to Yellowstone grizzly bears.

    Pauline L. Kamath;Mark A. Haroldson;Gordon Luikart;David Paetkau

  • Large-carnivore response to recreational big-game hunting along the Yellowstone National Park and Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness boundary

    Toni K. Ruth;Douglas W. Smith;Mark A. Haroldson;Polly C. Buotte

  • Yellowstone Grizzly Bear investigations: Annual report of the Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team 2018

    Frank T. van Manen;Mark A. Haroldson;Bryn Karabensh

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles C. Schwartz
Charles C. Schwartz United States Geological Survey
Frank T. van Manen
Frank T. van Manen United States Geological Survey
Gary C. White
Gary C. White Colorado State University
Charles T. Robbins
Charles T. Robbins Washington State University
Gordon B. Stenhouse
Gordon B. Stenhouse Western University of Health Sciences
Mark S. Boyce
Mark S. Boyce University of Alberta
David Paetkau
David Paetkau Wildlife Genetics International
Paul C. Cross
Paul C. Cross United States Geological Survey
Douglas W. Smith
Douglas W. Smith National Park Service
Howard Quigley
Howard Quigley Panthera Corporation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to a range of interdisciplinary careers. Many students are now choosing flexible, affordable online interdisciplinary studies tuition costs to broaden their academic experience and gain a competitive edge. These degrees allow you to combine fields like environmental science, policy, and education.

For those interested in historical perspectives on environmental change, an online masters in history offers valuable skills in research and analysis. This degree is ideal if you are looking to work in conservation organizations, museums, or academia.

A library science degree online is another strategic choice. It can lead to roles in information management and preservation, helping to safeguard ecological and evolutionary records for future generations.

Finally, accredited online programs such as accredited speech pathology programs expand your options into health and communication sciences, areas increasingly connected to environmental advocacy, wildlife rehabilitation, and education.

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. Haroldson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles