World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 74 1864 1681 106 101 196 23521

Mark van Vugt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark van Vugt between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark van Vugt published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2018. 21 of the 231 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2018. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 11 publications
1984 2025

231 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark van Vugt: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 2
1997 2
1998 4
1999 7
2000 3
2001 5
2002 5
2003 3
2004 4
2005 1
2006 4
2007 6
2008 15
2009 14
2010 2
2011 7
2012 14
2013 12
2014 7
2015 8
2016 6
2017 9
2018 16
2019 16
2020 12
2021 10
2022 6
2023 8
2024 10
2025 11
Total 231
Download as CSV

Mark van Vugt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark van Vugt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 196 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 196
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark van Vugt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark van Vugt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169 74
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark van Vugt is affiliated with the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple areas within psychology and social sciences, with a focus on evolutionary psychology and human behavior.

Their recent publications include:

  • COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action., 2020, American Psychologist
  • Understanding urbanicity: how interdisciplinary methods help to unravel the effects of the city on mental health, 2020, Psychological Medicine
  • Sex differences in trust and trustworthiness: A meta-analysis of the trust game and the gift-exchange game, 2020, Journal of Economic Psychology
  • From genes to minds to cultures: Evolutionary approaches to leadership, 2020, The Leadership Quarterly
  • Is green the new sexy? Romantic of conspicuous conservation, 2020, Journal of Environmental Psychology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Mark van Vugt are:

  • Norman P. Li
  • Gonzalo Palomo-Vélez
  • Ard J. Barends
  • Jayanth Narayanan
  • Christopher von Rueden

Publication venues where they have frequently contributed include:

  • The Leadership Quarterly
  • Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology
  • Evolution and Human Behavior
  • Journal of Environmental Psychology
  • Current Opinion in Psychology

Mark van Vugt has authored a book titled Managing Meetings in Organizations, published in 2020 as part of the Research on managing groups and teams series.

Their main fields of study cover:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Subfields prominently represented in their work include:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Safety Research

Primary research topics explored by Mark van Vugt are:

  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health

Best Publications

  • COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action.

    Kevin M. Kniffin;Jayanth Narayanan;Frederik Anseel;John Antonakis

  • Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past.

    Mark Van Vugt;Robert Hogan;Robert B. Kaiser

  • Nice Guys Finish First: The Competitive Altruism Hypothesis

    Charlie L. Hardy;Mark Van Vugt

  • Evolutionary Origins of Leadership and Followership

    Mark Van Vugt

  • Gender Differences in Cooperation and Competition The Male-Warrior Hypothesis

    Mark Van Vugt;David De Cremer;Dirk P. Janssen

  • Social identification effects in social dilemmas : a transformation of motives

    David De Cremer;Mark Van Vugt

  • Social identity as social glue: The origins of group loyalty

    Mark Van Vugt;Claire M. Hart

  • Evolution and the psychology of intergroup conflict: the male warrior hypothesis.

    Melissa M. McDonald;Carlos David Navarrete;Mark Van Vugt;Mark Van Vugt

  • The Origins and Evolution of Leadership

    Andrew J. King;Dominic D.P. Johnson;Mark Van Vugt;Mark Van Vugt

  • Exit, voice and loyalty: Analytic and empirical developments

    Keith Dowding;Peter John;Thanos Mergoupis;Mark Van Vugt

  • The Evolutionary Bases for Sustainable Behavior: Implications for Marketing, Policy, and Social Entrepreneurship:

    Vladas Griskevicius;Stephanie M. Cantú;Mark van Vugt

  • Sex differences in cooperation: a meta-analytic review of social dilemmas.

    Daniel Balliet;Norman P. Li;Shane J. Macfarlan;Mark Van Vugt

  • Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods

    M. van Vugt;D. De Cremer

  • Who Cares about the Environmental Impact of Cars? : Those with an Eye toward the Future

    Jeffrey A. Joireman;Paul A. M. Van Lange;Mark Van Vugt

  • Car Versus Public Transportation? The Role of Social Value Orientations in a Real-Life Social Dilemma1

    Mark Van Vugt;Ree M. Meertens;Paul A. M. Van Lange

  • social laughter is correlated with an elevated pain threshold

    R. I. M. Dunbar;Rebecca Baron;Anna Frangou;Eiluned Pearce

  • Conspiracy Theories: Evolved Functions and Psychological Mechanisms

    Jan Willem van Prooijen;Mark van Vugt;Mark van Vugt

  • Autocratic leadership in social dilemmas: A threat to group stability

    Mark Van Vugt;Sarah F. Jepson;Claire M. Hart;David De Cremer

  • From Games to Giving : Social Value Orientation Predicts Donations to Noble Causes

    Paul A.M. van Lange;René Bekkers;Theo N.M. Schuyt;Mark van Vugt

  • Averting the Tragedy of the Commons: Using Social Psychological Science to Protect the Environment

    Mark Van Vugt

  • Constraining free riding in public goods games: designated solitary punishers can sustain human cooperation

    Rick O'Gorman;Joseph Henrich;Mark Van Vugt

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul A. M. Van Lange
Paul A. M. Van Lange Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
David De Cremer
David De Cremer National University of Singapore
Norman P. Li
Norman P. Li Singapore Management University
Reinout E. de Vries
Reinout E. de Vries Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Joshua M. Tybur
Joshua M. Tybur Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Marise Ph. Born
Marise Ph. Born Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jeff Joireman
Jeff Joireman Washington State University
Abraham P. Buunk
Abraham P. Buunk University of Groningen
Mark Snyder
Mark Snyder University of Minnesota
Tom R. Tyler
Tom R. Tyler Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up diverse online study options and multiple career pathways, especially in the field of professional counseling. Online psychology programs offer flexible learning that can help you work towards roles like Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), school counselor, or mental health professional.

However, licensing requirements for counseling professionals vary by state. For example, understanding the Alabama licensed professional counselor requirements is crucial if you plan to practice in Alabama. Similarly, those interested in counseling careers in the far north should explore how to get an LPC license in Alaska to determine local eligibility and necessary education.

Aspiring counselors considering Arizona should research the LPC license requirements in Arizona, while those heading to Arkansas must understand how to get an LPC license in Arkansas. Each state has different standards for coursework, internships, and supervised experience. Carefully review local regulations and select online degrees that align with your career goals and the credentialing requirements of your intended state.

Best Scientists Citing Mark van Vugt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles