World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
14398
World Ranking
5573
National Ranking
3042

Jeff Joireman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeff Joireman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 114 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jeff Joireman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeff Joireman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeff Joireman is affiliated with Washington State University in the United States. Their research spans several fields within psychology and business, with a particular focus on the intersection of social and cognitive aspects in organizational and societal contexts.

Their recent publications highlight work in varied areas. Notable papers include:

  • Validación argentina de la escala de Consideración de las Consecuencias Futuras (CFC-14), 2020, Acta Colombiana de Psicología
  • Consumer response to corporate political advocacy: the role of policy attitudes, policy change, and perceived controversy, 2025, Journal of Business Research

The scientist often collaborates with several coauthors, which include:

  • Ignacio Acuña
  • Mauricio Federico Zalazar-Jaime
  • Yanina Michelini
  • Juan Ignacio Guzmán
  • Juan Carlos Godoy

Joireman's frequent publication venues correspond closely with their research topics and include:

  • Acta Colombiana de Psicología
  • Journal of Business Research

The primary fields of study for this researcher are psychology and business, management, and accounting. Specifically, their subfields of expertise cover areas such as:

  • Strategy and Management
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

The main topics explored in their work reflect a blend of psychological and organizational themes, including:

  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
  • Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting

The scope of Jeff Joireman's work positions them within multidisciplinary research that bridges psychological theories with practical organizational and societal issues. Their contributions with coauthors touch upon both applied and theoretical aspects, emphasizing the relationship between individual perspectives and broader corporate or political behaviors.

Best Publications

  • A comparison of three structural models for personality : the Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five

    Marvin Zuckerman;D. Michael Kuhlman;Jeffrey Joireman;Paul Teta

  • Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations : Theory and preliminary evidence

    P.A.M. van Lange;W. Otten;E.M.N. de Bruin;J.A. Joireman

  • The psychology of social dilemmas: A review.

    Paul A.M. Van Lange;Jeff Joireman;Craig D. Parks;Eric Van Dijk

  • Social Value Orientation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta-Analysis

    Daniel Patrick Balliet;Craig Parks;Jeff Joireman

  • Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of proenvironmental behaviour.

    Jeffrey A. Joireman;Terell P. Lasane;Jennifer Bennett;Diana Richards

  • Promotion Orientation Explains Why Future-Oriented People Exercise and Eat Healthy Evidence From the Two-Factor Consideration of Future Consequences-14 Scale

    Jeff Joireman;Monte J. Shaffer;Daniel Balliet;Alan Strathman

  • In-Role Perceptions Buffer the Negative Impact of Low LMX on Helping and Enhance the Positive Impact of High LMX on Voice

    Linn Van Dyne;Dishan Kamdar;Jeffrey Joireman

  • Who Cares about the Environmental Impact of Cars? : Those with an Eye toward the Future

    Jeffrey A. Joireman;Paul A. M. Van Lange;Mark Van Vugt

  • Consideration of future consequences, ego-depletion, and self-control: Support for distinguishing between CFC-Immediate and CFC-Future sub-scales

    Jeff Joireman;Daniel Patrick Balliet;David Sprott;Eric Spangenberg

  • When do customers offer firms a “second chance” following a double deviation? The impact of inferred firm motives on customer revenge and reconciliation

    Jeff Joireman;Yany Grégoire;Berna Devezer;Thomas M. Tripp

  • The aggression paradox: Understanding links among aggression, sensation seeking, and the consideration of future consequences.

    Jeff Joireman;Jonathan Anderson;Alan Strathman

  • Effect of outdoor temperature, heat primes and anchoring on belief in global warming

    Jeff Joireman;Heather Barnes Truelove;Blythe Duell

  • The influence of organizational justice on accountant whistleblowing

    Deborah L. Seifert;John T. Sweeney;Jeff Joireman;John M. Thornton

  • Concern with Immediate Consequences Magnifies the Impact of Compulsive Buying Tendencies on College Students' Credit Card Debt

    Jeff Joireman;Jeremy Kees;David Sprott

  • Good citizens to the end? It depends: empathy and concern with future consequences moderate the impact of a short-term time horizon on organizational citizenship behaviors.

    Jeff Joireman;Dishan Kamdar;Denise Daniels;Blythe Duell

  • Empathy and the Self-Absorption Paradox: Support for the Distinction Between Self-Rumination and Self-Reflection

    Jeffrey A. Joireman;Les Parrott;Joy Hammersla

  • Social Value Orientation, Expectations, and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta–Analysis:

    Jan Luca Pletzer;Jan Luca Pletzer;Daniel Balliet;Jeff Joireman;D. Michael Kuhlman

  • Cooperation, Trust, and Antagonism How Public Goods Are Promoted

    Craig D. Parks;Jeff Joireman;Paul A. M. Van Lange

  • Empathy and the Self-Absorption Paradox II: Self-Rumination and Self-Reflection as Mediators Between Shame, Guilt, and Empathy

    Jeff Joireman

  • Understanding behavior in the context of time : theory, research, and application

    Alan Strathman;Jeff Joireman

  • Social Value Orientation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas

    Daniel Patrick Balliet;C. Parks;J. Joireman

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul A. M. Van Lange
Paul A. M. Van Lange Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Daniel Balliet
Daniel Balliet Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
David E. Sprott
David E. Sprott Claremont Graduate University
Eric R. Spangenberg
Eric R. Spangenberg University of California, Irvine
Mark van Vugt
Mark van Vugt Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Marvin Zuckerman
Marvin Zuckerman University of Delaware
Darrel D. Muehling
Darrel D. Muehling Washington State University
Linn Van Dyne
Linn Van Dyne Michigan State University
Norman P. Li
Norman P. Li Singapore Management University
Eric van Dijk
Eric van Dijk Leiden University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of meaningful career paths, especially in counseling and mental health services. One growing field is substance abuse counseling, which offers the opportunity to make a real impact in individuals’ lives.

If you’re interested in this rewarding profession, researching the process in your area is essential. For insights specific to California, you can learn about how to become a substance abuse counselor in Anaheim. For those looking towards Alaska, read more on how to become a substance abuse counselor in Anchorage.

Certification standards and educational requirements can differ depending on your city or state. For example, you can explore detailed substance abuse counselor requirements in Arlington and review Atlanta substance abuse counselors education requirements to understand variations in coursework, licensing processes, and supervised fieldwork.

Online degrees in psychology can lay a solid foundation for these roles, offering flexibility for aspiring professionals. With the right education and credentials, you’ll be prepared to pursue a variety of career pathways in mental health and addiction support across the country.

Best Scientists Citing Jeff Joireman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles