World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 56 4209 3888 2348 2120 158 12373

Kim Fromme publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kim Fromme between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kim Fromme published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2011. 3 of the 165 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2011. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 5 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1983 2025

165 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kim Fromme: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 1
1985 0
1986 2
1987 2
1988 1
1989 1
1990 3
1991 0
1992 3
1993 1
1994 5
1995 1
1996 0
1997 4
1998 0
1999 2
2000 5
2001 2
2002 3
2003 4
2004 4
2005 2
2006 5
2007 4
2008 6
2009 3
2010 10
2011 12
2012 9
2013 2
2014 7
2015 8
2016 11
2017 5
2018 5
2019 5
2020 5
2021 10
2022 5
2023 3
2024 1
2025 2
Total 165
Download as CSV

Kim Fromme publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim Fromme sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 158 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 158
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kim Fromme D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim Fromme sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 56
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Kim Fromme is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. The research focuses primarily on medicine and psychology, with notable contributions to psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and applied psychology.

The scientist's work mainly addresses topics such as bipolar disorder and treatment, mental health research topics, behavioral health and interventions, functional brain connectivity studies, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, and schizophrenia research and treatment.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Dylan Kirsch, Elizabeth Lippard, Stephen M. Strakowski, Vanessa Le, and Valeria Tretyak. Their publications appear regularly in several scientific venues, especially Psychology of Addictive Behaviors and Biological Psychiatry, as well as Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, and Scientific Reports.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Kim Fromme include:

  • Contextual influences on subjective alcohol response. (2020, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology)
  • Childhood maltreatment, prefrontal-paralimbic gray matter volume, and substance use in young adults and interactions with risk for bipolar disorder. (2021, Scientific Reports)
  • Selection and socialization accounts of the relation between fraternity membership and sexual aggression. (2021, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors)
  • Relations among religiosity, age of self-identification as gay, lesbian, or bisexual, and alcohol use among college students. (2020, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors)
  • Neural underpinnings of expecting alcohol: Placebo alcohol administration alters nucleus accumbens resting state functional connectivity. (2022, Behavioural Brain Research)

Kim Fromme was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2007.

Best Publications

  • A review of expectancy theory and alcohol consumption.

    Barry T. Jones;Will Corbin;Will Corbin;Kim Fromme

  • Comprehensive effects of alcohol: Development and psychometric assessment of a new expectancy questionnaire.

    Kim Fromme;Elizabeth A. Stroot;David Kaplan

  • Secondary prevention with college drinkers: evaluation of an alcohol skills training program.

    D. R. Kivlahan;G. A. Marlatt;K. Fromme;D. B. Coppel

  • Behavioral risks during the transition from high school to college.

    Kim Fromme;William R. Corbin;Marc I. Kruse

  • An experimental test of three methods of alcohol risk reduction with young adults.

    J. S. Baer;G. A. Marlatt;Daniel R. Kivlahan;Kim Fromme

  • Outcome expectancies and risk-taking behavior

    Kim Fromme;Elizabeth C. Katz;Kathy Rivet

  • Intoxicated sexual risk taking: an expectancy or cognitive impairment explanation?

    Kim Fromme;Elizabeth J. D'Amico;Elizabeth C. Katz

  • Measuring adolescent alcohol outcome expectancies.

    Kim Fromme;Elizabeth J. D'Amico

  • Self-Regulation as a Protective Factor against Risky Drinking and Sexual Behavior

    Patrick D. Quinn;Kim Fromme

  • Prevention of heavy drinking and associated negative consequences among mandated and voluntary college students.

    Kim Fromme;William Corbin

  • Trajectories and Determinants of Alcohol Use among LGB Young Adults and Their Heterosexual Peers: Results from a Prospective Study.

    Mark L. Hatzenbuehler;William R. Corbin;Kim Fromme

  • Correlates of alcohol consumption: Sex, age, and expectancies relate differentially to quantity and frequency

    Debra K. Mooney;Kim Fromme;Daniel R. Kivlahan;G. Alan Marlatt

  • Effects of Outcome Expectancies and Personality on Young Adults' Illicit Drug Use, Heavy Drinking, and Risky Sexual Behavior

    Elizabeth C. Katz;Kim Fromme;Elizabeth J. D'Amico

  • Effects of alcohol intoxication on the perceived consequences of risk taking.

    Kim Fromme;Elizabeth Katz;Elizabeth D'Amico

  • Subjective Response to Alcohol Challenge: A Quantitative Review

    Patrick D. Quinn;Kim Fromme

  • Measurement of Alcohol-Related Consequences among High School and College Students: Application of Item Response Models to the Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index.

    Derrick J. Neal;Derrick J. Neal;William R. Corbin;Kim Fromme

  • Discrimination and alcohol-related problems among college students: A prospective examination of mediating effects

    Mark L. Hatzenbuehler;William R. Corbin;Kim Fromme

  • Event-level covariation of alcohol intoxication and behavioral risks during the first year of college.

    Dan J. Neal;Kim Fromme

  • Alcohol use and serial monogamy as risks for sexually transmitted diseases in young adults.

    William R. Corbin;Kim Fromme

  • The alcohol skills training program: A group intervention for young adult drinkers☆

    Kim Fromme;G.Alan Marlatt;John S. Baer;Daniel R. Kivlahan

Frequent Co-Authors

William R. Corbin
William R. Corbin Arizona State University
G. Alan Marlatt
G. Alan Marlatt University of Washington
K. Paige Harden
K. Paige Harden The University of Texas at Austin
Daniel R. Kivlahan
Daniel R. Kivlahan University of Washington
Stephen M. Strakowski
Stephen M. Strakowski The University of Texas at Austin
John S. Baer
John S. Baer University of Washington
Kenneth J. Sher
Kenneth J. Sher University of Missouri
Sherry H. Stewart
Sherry H. Stewart Dalhousie University
Reinout W. Wiers
Reinout W. Wiers University of Amsterdam
Helene R. White
Helene R. White Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology opens up a range of online degrees and career opportunities across mental health, education, and healthcare. Many students consider specialized career pathways, such as speech-language pathology, which blends psychology, language, and communication science.

If you are interested in this field, it’s important to understand the educational and licensing requirements, which can vary significantly by state. For example, refer to this guide on how to become a speech language pathologist in Vermont for details on Vermont’s unique process. Similarly, you can review slp requirements in Virginia and how to become a speech language pathologist in Washington to understand regional differences in training, exams, and state licensure.

Additionally, if you’re considering West Virginia, take a look at the specifics for how to become a speech language pathologist in West Virginia. As you explore psychology and related online degrees, researching state-specific career pathways ensures you’re prepared for success in your chosen field.

Best Scientists Citing Kim Fromme

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles