2023 - Research.com Psychology in Singapore Leader Award
2022 - Research.com Psychology in Singapore Leader Award
His primary scientific interests are in Social psychology, Social dilemma, Procedural justice, Social relation and Public relations. His Social psychology study incorporates themes from Social value orientations and Public good. He studied Social dilemma and Prosocial behavior that intersect with Salience.
His Procedural justice study combines topics in areas such as Justice, Affect, Distributive justice and Welfare. His research in Social relation intersects with topics in Organizational justice, Developmental psychology, Social environment, Equity and Social issues. The Public relations study combines topics in areas such as Field and Value.
His main research concerns Social psychology, Social dilemma, Procedural justice, Public relations and Feeling. His Social psychology study deals with Public good intersecting with Dilemma. His Social dilemma research includes elements of Function and Sanctions.
His Procedural justice research integrates issues from Affect, Self-esteem, Equity, Organizational citizenship behavior and Economic Justice. David De Cremer regularly links together related areas like Field in his Public relations studies. His Social group study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Interpersonal relationship and Social identity theory.
David De Cremer mainly focuses on Social psychology, Interpersonal communication, Perception, Power and Organizational behavior. His studies in Social psychology integrate themes in fields like Business ethics and Value. His research on Interpersonal communication also deals with topics like
His Perception research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Transparency, Affect, Organizational culture and Competence. The study incorporates disciplines such as Discretion and Moral reasoning in addition to Power. As a part of the same scientific study, David De Cremer usually deals with the Organizational behavior, concentrating on Norm and frequently concerns with Harm, Cheating, Anger, Disgust and Construal level theory.
David De Cremer mostly deals with Social psychology, Public relations, Perception, Feeling and Business ethics. His Social psychology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Power and Value. His Organizational justice study in the realm of Public relations connects with subjects such as Work setting.
As a part of the same scientific family, David De Cremer mostly works in the field of Perception, focusing on Affect and, on occasion, Fairness perceptions and Social comparison theory. His Prosocial behavior study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Priming, Organizational behavior, Compensation and Ostracism. His Procedural justice study combines topics in areas such as Empirical evidence, Social perception, Job performance, Social learning theory and Organizational culture.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.
Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda
Daan van Knippenberg;Barbara van Knippenberg;David De Cremer;Michael A. Hogg.
Gender Differences in Cooperation and Competition The Male-Warrior Hypothesis
Mark Van Vugt;David De Cremer;Dirk P. Janssen.
Social identification effects in social dilemmas : a transformation of motives
David De Cremer;Mark Van Vugt.
How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness.
David De Cremer;Daan van Knippenberg.
Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods
M. van Vugt;D. De Cremer.
Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: the roles of social responsibility and reciprocity
David De Cremer;Paul A. M. Van Lange.
The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation.
David De Cremer;Tom R. Tyler.
Undermining trust and cooperation : The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas
Laetitia B. Mulder;Eric van Dijk;David De Cremer;Henk A.M. Wilke.
‘The less I trust, the less I contribute (or not)?’ The effects of trust, accountability and self‐monitoring in social dilemmas
David De Cremer;Mark Snyder;Siegfried Dewitte.
Autocratic leadership in social dilemmas: A threat to group stability
Mark Van Vugt;Sarah F. Jepson;Claire M. Hart;David De Cremer.
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below: