What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Social psychology
- Law
- Social science
His primary scientific interests are in Social psychology, Social dilemma, Procedural justice, Social relation and Public relations.
His Social psychology study incorporates themes from Social value orientations and Public good.
He studied Social dilemma and Prosocial behavior that intersect with Salience.
His Procedural justice study combines topics in areas such as Justice, Affect, Distributive justice and Welfare.
His research in Social relation intersects with topics in Organizational justice, Developmental psychology, Social environment, Equity and Social issues.
The Public relations study combines topics in areas such as Field and Value.
His most cited work include:
- Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda (577 citations)
- Gender Differences in Cooperation and Competition The Male-Warrior Hypothesis (376 citations)
- How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. (350 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His main research concerns Social psychology, Social dilemma, Procedural justice, Public relations and Feeling.
His Social psychology study deals with Public good intersecting with Dilemma.
His Social dilemma research includes elements of Function and Sanctions.
His Procedural justice research integrates issues from Affect, Self-esteem, Equity, Organizational citizenship behavior and Economic Justice.
David De Cremer regularly links together related areas like Field in his Public relations studies.
His Social group study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Interpersonal relationship and Social identity theory.
He most often published in these fields:
- Social psychology (84.41%)
- Social dilemma (16.67%)
- Procedural justice (15.86%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?
- Social psychology (84.41%)
- Interpersonal communication (9.14%)
- Perception (7.80%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
David De Cremer mainly focuses on Social psychology, Interpersonal communication, Perception, Power and Organizational behavior.
His studies in Social psychology integrate themes in fields like Business ethics and Value.
His research on Interpersonal communication also deals with topics like
- Field which connect with Behavioral economics, Intrapersonal communication, Behavioral ethics, Social identity theory and Consistency,
- Organizational justice, which have a strong connection to Justice, Employee research, Relevance and Employee engagement.
His Perception research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Transparency, Affect, Organizational culture and Competence.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Discretion and Moral reasoning in addition to Power.
As a part of the same scientific study, David De Cremer usually deals with the Organizational behavior, concentrating on Norm and frequently concerns with Harm, Cheating, Anger, Disgust and Construal level theory.
Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Successful Organizational Change: Integrating the Management Practice and Scholarly Literatures (67 citations)
- The integrity challenge of the Internet-of-Things (IoT): on understanding its dark side (36 citations)
- Fairness Enactment as Response to Higher Level Unfairness The Roles of Self-Construal and Spatial Distance (20 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Social psychology
- Law
- Social science
David De Cremer mostly deals with Social psychology, Public relations, Perception, Feeling and Business ethics.
His Social psychology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Power and Value.
His Organizational justice study in the realm of Public relations connects with subjects such as Work setting.
As a part of the same scientific family, David De Cremer mostly works in the field of Perception, focusing on Affect and, on occasion, Fairness perceptions and Social comparison theory.
His Prosocial behavior study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Priming, Organizational behavior, Compensation and Ostracism.
His Procedural justice study combines topics in areas such as Empirical evidence, Social perception, Job performance, Social learning theory and Organizational culture.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
