World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
Singapore
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
86
Citations
25266
World Ranking
1147
National Ranking
2

David De Cremer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David De Cremer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 344 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

David De Cremer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David De Cremer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Singapore Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Singapore Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in Singapore Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in Singapore Leader Award

Overview

David De Cremer is affiliated with the National University of Singapore. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with a focus on several subfields including Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, and Communication.

Their work addresses a range of topics with particular emphasis on:

  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
  • Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Knowledge Management and Sharing

David De Cremer's research output includes several recent papers published in peer-reviewed academic journals. These include:

  • No person is an island: Unpacking the work and after-work consequences of interacting with artificial intelligence (2023, Journal of Applied Psychology)
  • Procedural justice enactment as an instrument of position protection: The three-way interaction between leaders' power position stability, followers' warmth, and followers' competence (2020, Journal of Organizational Behavior)
  • Cognitive foundations of impartial punitive decision making in organizations: Attribution and abstraction (2020, Journal of Organizational Behavior)
  • Untangling the team social capital-team innovation link: The role of proportional task conflict as well as group- and differentiated individual-focused transformational leadership (2022, Human Relations)
  • Do these jeans make me feel fat? Exploring subjective fatness, its workplace outcomes, and rethinking the role of subjectivity in the stigmatization process (2023, Personnel Psychology)

The prominent journals where their work has been published include:

  • Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Human Relations
  • Personnel Psychology
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Collaborative relationships appear consistent, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Marius van Dijke
  • Gijs van Houwelingen
  • Jakob Stollberger
  • Niek Hoogervorst
  • Lucas Meijs

David De Cremer's body of work reflects interdisciplinary engagement, integrating social psychological theory with organizational behavior studies and applying them to contemporary workplace issues such as artificial intelligence interaction, leadership dynamics, procedural justice, and stigmatization processes.

Best Publications

  • Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda

    Daan van Knippenberg;Barbara van Knippenberg;David De Cremer;Michael A. Hogg

  • Gender Differences in Cooperation and Competition The Male-Warrior Hypothesis

    Mark Van Vugt;David De Cremer;Dirk P. Janssen

  • Social identification effects in social dilemmas : a transformation of motives

    David De Cremer;Mark Van Vugt

  • Successful Organizational Change: Integrating the Management Practice and Scholarly Literatures

    Jeroen Stouten;Denise M. Rousseau;David De Cremer

  • How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness.

    David De Cremer;Daan van Knippenberg

  • Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods

    M. van Vugt;D. De Cremer

  • The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation.

    David De Cremer;Tom R. Tyler

  • Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: the roles of social responsibility and reciprocity

    David De Cremer;Paul A. M. Van Lange

  • Undermining trust and cooperation : The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas

    Laetitia B. Mulder;Eric van Dijk;David De Cremer;Henk A.M. Wilke

  • Autocratic leadership in social dilemmas: A threat to group stability

    Mark Van Vugt;Sarah F. Jepson;Claire M. Hart;David De Cremer

  • Leader self-sacrifice and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of leader self-confidence

    David De Cremer;Daan van Knippenberg

  • ‘The less I trust, the less I contribute (or not)?’ The effects of trust, accountability and self‐monitoring in social dilemmas

    David De Cremer;Mark Snyder;Siegfried Dewitte

  • Managing Group Behavior: The Interplay Between Procedural Justice, Sense of Self, and Cooperation

    David De Cremer;Tom R. Tyler

  • Respect and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: The Importance of Feeling Included

    David de Cremer

  • Perceived support as a mediator of the relationship between justice and trust: A multiple foci approach

    Florence Stinglhamber;David De Cremer;Liesbeth Mercken

  • Am I Respected or Not?: Inclusion and Reputation as Issues in Group Membership

    David de Cremer;Tom R. Tyler

  • Affective and motivational consequences of leader self-sacrifice: The moderating effect of autocratic leadership

    David De Cremer

  • Self-uncertainty and responsiveness to procedural justice

    David De Cremer;Constantine Sedikides

  • Robots at work: People prefer-and forgive-service robots with perceived feelings.

    Kai Chi Yam;Yochanan E Bigman;Pok Man Tang;Remus Ilies

  • Social value orientations and the strategic use of fairness in ultimatum bargaining

    Eric van Dijk;David De Cremer;Michel J.J Handgraaf

  • When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers' prevention focus.

    David De Cremer;David M. Mayer;Marius van Dijke;Barbara C. Schouten

  • Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making

    David De Cremer

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric van Dijk
Eric van Dijk Leiden University
Alain Van Hiel
Alain Van Hiel Ghent University
Daan van Knippenberg
Daan van Knippenberg Rice University
Constantine Sedikides
Constantine Sedikides University of Southampton
David M. Mayer
David M. Mayer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Maarten A. S. Boksem
Maarten A. S. Boksem Erasmus University Rotterdam
Tom R. Tyler
Tom R. Tyler Yale University
Mark van Vugt
Mark van Vugt Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Joel Brockner
Joel Brockner Columbia University
Arjan E. R. Bos
Arjan E. R. Bos The Open University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to various specialized careers, including marriage and family therapy (MFT). Many students opt for online psychology degrees, which can provide flexibility as they meet specific state requirements for professional practice.

Becoming a licensed marriage and family therapist involves earning a relevant graduate degree, completing supervised clinical hours, and passing certification exams. Requirements can vary significantly by location. For example, you can learn more about how to become an mft in Oakland, or explore Oklahoma City mft education requirements to see local pathways.

If you are considering other regions, you might review Omaha mft education requirements or look into Orlando mft certification requirements. Understanding these differences can help you choose an online degree program that best aligns with your career goals and state licensing needs.

Best Scientists Citing David De Cremer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles