H-Index & Metrics Best Publications

H-Index & Metrics

Discipline name H-index Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Psychology D-index 76 Citations 19,849 264 World Ranking 996 National Ranking 1

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Social psychology
  • Law
  • Social science

His primary scientific interests are in Social psychology, Social dilemma, Procedural justice, Social relation and Public relations. His Social psychology study incorporates themes from Social value orientations and Public good. He studied Social dilemma and Prosocial behavior that intersect with Salience.

His Procedural justice study combines topics in areas such as Justice, Affect, Distributive justice and Welfare. His research in Social relation intersects with topics in Organizational justice, Developmental psychology, Social environment, Equity and Social issues. The Public relations study combines topics in areas such as Field and Value.

His most cited work include:

  • Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda (577 citations)
  • Gender Differences in Cooperation and Competition The Male-Warrior Hypothesis (376 citations)
  • How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. (350 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Social psychology, Social dilemma, Procedural justice, Public relations and Feeling. His Social psychology study deals with Public good intersecting with Dilemma. His Social dilemma research includes elements of Function and Sanctions.

His Procedural justice research integrates issues from Affect, Self-esteem, Equity, Organizational citizenship behavior and Economic Justice. David De Cremer regularly links together related areas like Field in his Public relations studies. His Social group study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Interpersonal relationship and Social identity theory.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Social psychology (84.41%)
  • Social dilemma (16.67%)
  • Procedural justice (15.86%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Social psychology (84.41%)
  • Interpersonal communication (9.14%)
  • Perception (7.80%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

David De Cremer mainly focuses on Social psychology, Interpersonal communication, Perception, Power and Organizational behavior. His studies in Social psychology integrate themes in fields like Business ethics and Value. His research on Interpersonal communication also deals with topics like

  • Field which connect with Behavioral economics, Intrapersonal communication, Behavioral ethics, Social identity theory and Consistency,
  • Organizational justice, which have a strong connection to Justice, Employee research, Relevance and Employee engagement.

His Perception research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Transparency, Affect, Organizational culture and Competence. The study incorporates disciplines such as Discretion and Moral reasoning in addition to Power. As a part of the same scientific study, David De Cremer usually deals with the Organizational behavior, concentrating on Norm and frequently concerns with Harm, Cheating, Anger, Disgust and Construal level theory.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Successful Organizational Change: Integrating the Management Practice and Scholarly Literatures (67 citations)
  • The integrity challenge of the Internet-of-Things (IoT): on understanding its dark side (36 citations)
  • Fairness Enactment as Response to Higher Level Unfairness The Roles of Self-Construal and Spatial Distance (20 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Social psychology
  • Law
  • Social science

David De Cremer mostly deals with Social psychology, Public relations, Perception, Feeling and Business ethics. His Social psychology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Power and Value. His Organizational justice study in the realm of Public relations connects with subjects such as Work setting.

As a part of the same scientific family, David De Cremer mostly works in the field of Perception, focusing on Affect and, on occasion, Fairness perceptions and Social comparison theory. His Prosocial behavior study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Priming, Organizational behavior, Compensation and Ostracism. His Procedural justice study combines topics in areas such as Empirical evidence, Social perception, Job performance, Social learning theory and Organizational culture.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda

Daan van Knippenberg;Barbara van Knippenberg;David De Cremer;Michael A. Hogg.
Leadership Quarterly (2004)

1069 Citations

Social identification effects in social dilemmas : a transformation of motives

David De Cremer;Mark Van Vugt.
European Journal of Social Psychology (1999)

678 Citations

Gender Differences in Cooperation and Competition The Male-Warrior Hypothesis

Mark Van Vugt;David De Cremer;Dirk P. Janssen.
Psychological Science (2007)

674 Citations

How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness.

David De Cremer;Daan van Knippenberg.
Journal of Applied Psychology (2002)

575 Citations

Leadership in social dilemmas: The effects of group identification on collective actions to provide public goods

M. van Vugt;D. De Cremer.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1999)

441 Citations

Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: the roles of social responsibility and reciprocity

David De Cremer;Paul A. M. Van Lange.
European Journal of Personality (2001)

366 Citations

Undermining trust and cooperation : The paradox of sanctioning systems in social dilemmas

Laetitia B. Mulder;Eric van Dijk;David De Cremer;Henk A.M. Wilke.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2006)

359 Citations

The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation.

David De Cremer;Tom R. Tyler.
Journal of Applied Psychology (2007)

359 Citations

"The less I trust, the less I contribute (or not)?": The effects of trust, accountability and self-monitoring in social dilemmas

David De Cremer;Mark Snyder;Siegfried Dewitte.
European Journal of Social Psychology (2001)

339 Citations

Managing Group Behavior: The Interplay Between Procedural Justice, Sense of Self, and Cooperation

David De Cremer;Tom R. Tyler.
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (2005)

331 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing David De Cremer

Mark van Vugt

Mark van Vugt

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Publications: 74

Daan van Knippenberg

Daan van Knippenberg

Drexel University

Publications: 71

Michael A. Hogg

Michael A. Hogg

Claremont Graduate University

Publications: 37

Paul A. M. Van Lange

Paul A. M. Van Lange

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Publications: 35

Eric van Dijk

Eric van Dijk

Leiden University

Publications: 31

Rolf van Dick

Rolf van Dick

Goethe University Frankfurt

Publications: 29

Gerben A. van Kleef

Gerben A. van Kleef

University of Amsterdam

Publications: 27

Russell E. Johnson

Russell E. Johnson

Michigan State University

Publications: 26

Daniel Balliet

Daniel Balliet

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Publications: 26

S. Alexander Haslam

S. Alexander Haslam

University of Queensland

Publications: 25

Robert G. Lord

Robert G. Lord

Durham University

Publications: 22

Tom R. Tyler

Tom R. Tyler

Yale University

Publications: 21

Carsten K. W. De Dreu

Carsten K. W. De Dreu

University of Amsterdam

Publications: 20

Kees van den Bos

Kees van den Bos

Utrecht University

Publications: 20

David M. Mayer

David M. Mayer

University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

Publications: 20

Michael J. Platow

Michael J. Platow

Australian National University

Publications: 18

Something went wrong. Please try again later.