World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6522 6070 3538 3210 89 19061

David M. Mayer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David M. Mayer between 2003 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David M. Mayer published across 22 years, from 2003 to 2024, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2010. 2 of the 93 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2010. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications
2003 2024

93 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David M. Mayer: publications per year, 2003 to 2024
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 2
2005 1
2006 1
2007 3
2008 5
2009 7
2010 11
2011 7
2012 11
2013 9
2014 5
2015 3
2016 5
2017 3
2018 4
2019 6
2020 3
2021 4
2022 0
2023 0
2024 2
Total 93
Download as CSV

David M. Mayer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Mayer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 89 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 89
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

David M. Mayer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Mayer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

David M. Mayer is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research work spans several subfields, including Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, and Information Systems and Management.

Their published work addresses topics such as Management and Organizational Studies, Cultural Differences and Values, Emotions and Moral Behavior, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, and Ethics in Business and Education.

Recent publications include the following papers: "Show me the... family: How photos of meaningful relationships reduce unethical behavior at work" (2020) in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, "Collectivistic Leadership in Context: An Examination of How and When Collective Charismatic Leadership Relates to Unit Functioning" (2021) in Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, "Ethical Organizational Climate Scale" (2020) in PsycTESTS Dataset, "Coworker Fair Behavior Measure" (2021) in PsycTESTS Dataset, and "Novel Perspectives on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Expanding the OCB Literature" (2024) in Academy of Management Proceedings.

The frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies

Collaborators often working with David M. Mayer are:

  • Ashley Elizabeth Hardin
  • Christopher W. Bauman
  • Jonathan C. Ziegert
  • Ronald F. Piccolo
  • Katrina A. Graham

David M. Mayer was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2018.

Best Publications

  • How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model

    David M. Mayer;Maribeth Kuenzi;Rebecca L. Greenbaum;Mary Bardes

  • Who Displays Ethical Leadership, and Why Does It Matter? An Examination of Antecedents and Consequences of Ethical Leadership

    David M. Mayer;Karl Aquino;Rebecca L. Greenbaum;Maribeth Kuenzi

  • Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader-member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification

    Fred O. Walumbwa;David M. Mayer;Peng Wang;Hui Wang

  • WHY EMPLOYEES DO BAD THINGS: MORAL DISENGAGEMENT AND UNETHICAL ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR

    Celia Moore;James R. Detert;Linda Klebe Treviño;Vicki L. Baker

  • Understanding organization-customer links in service settings.

    Benjamin Schneider;Mark G. Ehrhart;David M. Mayer;Jessica L. Saltz

  • Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors.

    Adam M. Grant;David M. Mayer

  • Do inclusive leaders help to reduce turnover in diverse groups? The moderating role of leader-member exchange in the diversity to turnover relationship.

    Lisa H. Nishii;David M. Mayer

  • Examining the Link Between Ethical Leadership and Employee Misconduct: The Mediating Role of Ethical Climate

    David M. Mayer;Maribeth Kuenzi;Rebecca L. Greenbaum

  • How Do They Get There? An Examination of the Antecedents of Centrality in Team Networks

    Katherine J. Klein;Beng-Chong Lim;Jessica L. Saltz;David M. Mayer

  • A TRICKLE-DOWN MODEL OF ABUSIVE SUPERVISION

    Mary Bardes Mawritz;David M. Mayer;Jenny M. Hoobler;Sandy J. Wayne

  • Do servant-leaders help satisfy follower needs? An organizational justice perspective

    David M. Mayer;Mary Bardes;Ronald F. Piccolo

  • Understanding attitudes toward affirmative action programs in employment: summary and meta-analysis of 35 years of research.

    David A. Harrison;David A. Kravitz;David M. Mayer;Lisa M. Leslie

  • The precursors and products of justice climates: Group leader antecedents and employee attitudinal consequences.

    David M. Mayer;Lisa Hisae Nishii;Benjamin Schneider;Harold Goldstein

  • Me or we? The role of personality and justice as other-centered antecedents to innovative citizenship behaviors within organizations.

    Henry Moon;Dishan Kamdar;David M. Mayer;Riki Takeuchi

  • Leaders matter morally: The role of ethical leadership in shaping employee moral cognition and misconduct.

    Celia Moore;David M Mayer;Flora F T Chiang;Craig Crossley

  • Trickle-down effects of supervisor perceptions of interactional justice: a moderated mediation approach.

    Maureen L. Ambrose;Marshall Schminke;David M. Mayer

  • Encouraging employees to report unethical conduct internally: It takes a village

    David M. Mayer;Samir Nurmohamed;Linda Klebe Treviño;Debra L. Shapiro

  • Breaking rules for the right reasons? An investigation of pro-social rule breaking

    Jason J. Dahling;Samantha L. Chau;David M. Mayer;Jane B. Gregory

  • When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers' prevention focus.

    David De Cremer;David M. Mayer;Marius van Dijke;Barbara C. Schouten

  • My Boss is Morally Disengaged: The Role of Ethical Leadership in Explaining the Interactive Effect of Supervisor and Employee Moral Disengagement on Employee Behaviors

    Julena M. Bonner;Rebecca L. Greenbaum;David M. Mayer

Frequent Co-Authors

David De Cremer
David De Cremer National University of Singapore
Marius van Dijke
Marius van Dijke Erasmus University Rotterdam
Rebecca L. Greenbaum
Rebecca L. Greenbaum Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Marshall Schminke
Marshall Schminke University of Central Florida
Linda Klebe Treviño
Linda Klebe Treviño Pennsylvania State University
Benjamin Schneider
Benjamin Schneider University of Maryland, College Park
Lisa Hisae Nishii
Lisa Hisae Nishii Cornell University
Michele J. Gelfand
Michele J. Gelfand Stanford University
Karl Aquino
Karl Aquino University of British Columbia
Maureen L. Ambrose
Maureen L. Ambrose University of Central Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree options and specialized career pathways. One increasingly popular profession is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which can provide rewarding roles in education, healthcare, and behavior therapy.

The journey to earning BCBA certification typically involves completing a graduate degree, supervised fieldwork, and passing a national exam. However, requirements can vary by location. For example, students in California can review the Long Beach bcba education requirements and the Los Angeles bcba requirements to understand local educational and fieldwork expectations.

In other areas, like Kentucky and Texas, students should become familiar with the Louisville bcba requirements and bcba certification requirements in Lubbock. Understanding the specifics of each region will help you choose the right program and prepare for successful certification and job placement.

As online psychology degrees and BCBA pathways continue to expand, now is a great time to explore flexible study options and diverse behavior analysis careers across the country.

Best Scientists Citing David M. Mayer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles