World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
39
Citations
5251
World Ranking
5735
National Ranking
229

Marius van Dijke publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marius van Dijke sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 122 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Marius van Dijke D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marius van Dijke sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marius van Dijke is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple areas of social sciences and psychology, with a focus on organizational behavior and social psychology.

The fields of study covered by their work include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Within these broad fields, their subfields of expertise are:

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Safety Research

The main research topics addressed by Marius van Dijke's publications encompass:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Ethics in Business and Education

Some of the frequent publication venues where this researcher has contributed include:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Marius van Dijke has collaborated regularly with other researchers, most notably:

  • Leander De Schutter
  • David De Cremer
  • Gijs van Houwelingen
  • Joost M. Leunissen

Their recent papers include:

  • "Conducting organizational survey and experimental research online: From convenient to ambitious in study designs, recruiting, and data quality" (2022), published in Organizational Psychology Review
  • "Expressing forgiveness after interpersonal mistreatment: Power and status of forgivers influence transgressors' relationship restoration efforts" (2020), published in Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • "Procedural justice enactment as an instrument of position protection: The three-way interaction between leaders' power position stability, followers' warmth, and followers' competence" (2020), published in Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • "Nostalgia in organizations" (2022), published in Current Opinion in Psychology
  • "The Effect of Decisional Leader Procrastination on Employee Innovation: Investigating the Moderating Role of Employees' Resistance to Change" (2021), published in Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies

Best Publications

  • When does self-sacrificial leadership motivate prosocial behavior? It depends on followers' prevention focus.

    David De Cremer;David M. Mayer;Marius van Dijke;Barbara C. Schouten

  • Trust in authorities as a boundary condition to procedural fairness effects on tax compliance

    Marius van Dijke;Peter Verboon

  • Ethical leadership and follower organizational deviance: The moderating role of follower moral attentiveness

    Suzanne van Gils;Niels Van Quaquebeke;Daan van Knippenberg;Marius van Dijke

  • Can a leader be seen as too ethical? The curvilinear effects of ethical leadership

    Jeroen Stouten;Marius van Dijke;David M. Mayer;David De Cremer

  • Striving for personal power as a basis for social power dynamics

    Marius van Dijke;Matthijs Poppe

  • Leader mistreatment, employee hostility, and deviant behaviors: Integrating self-uncertainty and thwarted needs perspectives on deviance

    David M. Mayer;Stefan Thau;Kristina M. Workman;Marius Van Dijke

  • When does procedural fairness promote organizational citizenship behavior? Integrating empowering leadership types in relational justice models

    Marius van Dijke;David De Cremer;David De Cremer;David M. Mayer;Niels Van Quaquebeke

  • The Role of Authority Power in Explaining Procedural Fairness Effects

    Marius van Dijke;David De Cremer;David M. Mayer

  • A self-interest analysis of justice and tax compliance: How distributive justice moderates the effect of outcome favorability

    Peter Verboon;Marius van Dijke

  • Cooperating when "you" and "I" are treated fairly: the moderating role of leader prototypicality.

    David De Cremer;Marius van Dijke;David M. Mayer

  • Power, justice, and trust: A moderated mediation analysis of tax compliance among Ethiopian business owners

    Lemessa Bayissa Gobena;Marius Van Dijke

  • When do severe sanctions enhance compliance? The role of procedural fairness

    Peter Verboon;Marius van Dijke

  • When are workload and workplace learning opportunities related in a curvilinear manner? The moderating role of autonomy

    Joris van Ruysseveldt;Marius van Dijke

  • When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees' work attitudes and behaviors? The moderating effect of uncertainty.

    David De Cremer;Joel Brockner;Ariel Fishman;Marius van Dijke

  • Being “in Control” May Make You Lose Control: The Role of Self-Regulation in Unethical Leadership Behavior

    Anne Joosten;Marius van Dijke;Alain Van Hiel;David De Cremer

  • Fairness as social responsibility: a moral self-regulation account of procedural justice enactment

    Lieven Brebels;David De Cremer;Marius Van Dijke;Alain Van Hiel

  • The apology mismatch: asymmetries between victim's need for apologies and perpetrator's willingness to apologize

    Joost M. Leunissen;David De Cremer;Christopher P. Reinders Folmer;Marius van Dijke

  • When leaders are seen as transformational: the effects of organizational justice

    David De Cremer;Marius van Dijke;Arjan E. R. Bos

  • Self-sacrificial leadership and follower self-esteem : When collective identification matters

    David De Cremer;Daan van Knippenberg;Marius van Dijke;Arjan E. R. Bos

  • Leader's procedural justice affecting identification and trust

    David De Cremer;Marius van Dijke;Arjan E.R. Bos

Frequent Co-Authors

David De Cremer
David De Cremer National University of Singapore
Alain Van Hiel
Alain Van Hiel Ghent University
David M. Mayer
David M. Mayer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Arjan E. R. Bos
Arjan E. R. Bos The Open University
Joel Brockner
Joel Brockner Columbia University
Daan van Knippenberg
Daan van Knippenberg Rice University
Simon Lloyd D. Restubog
Simon Lloyd D. Restubog University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Constantine Sedikides
Constantine Sedikides University of Southampton
Tim Wildschut
Tim Wildschut University of Southampton
Karl Aquino
Karl Aquino University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online study options in Social Sciences and Humanities can open doors to rewarding careers while providing flexibility. Accelerated learning options are increasingly popular, such as one year masters programs, which allow you to earn your graduate degree rapidly and enter the workforce sooner.

If you’re looking to complete a bachelor’s degree efficiently, consider accelerated degree programs online. These programs are designed for motivated learners eager to graduate in less time without compromising quality.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. Aspiring social workers can benefit from the cheapest msw programs available online, making advanced education more accessible.

For those interested in applied behavioral analysis, pursuing a bcba school online can help you meet certification requirements while maintaining your current commitments.

By exploring these online study choices, you can find flexible, cost-effective routes to advance your knowledge and unlock new career opportunities in Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Marius van Dijke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles