World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 114 325 283 208 178 356 86165

Tom R. Tyler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tom R. Tyler between 1977 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tom R. Tyler published across 50 years, from 1977 to 2026, averaging 9.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2013. 6 of the 465 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2013. 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 7 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 14 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 35 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 1 publication
1977 2026

465 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tom R. Tyler: publications per year, 1977 to 2026
Year Publications
1977 2
1978 1
1979 0
1980 3
1981 4
1982 3
1983 5
1984 7
1985 4
1986 5
1987 5
1988 14
1989 7
1990 6
1991 7
1992 4
1993 3
1994 7
1995 5
1996 6
1997 13
1998 5
1999 2
2000 7
2001 19
2002 10
2003 11
2004 6
2005 14
2006 14
2007 13
2008 11
2009 15
2010 23
2011 15
2012 21
2013 35
2014 15
2015 26
2016 17
2017 16
2018 9
2019 12
2020 8
2021 8
2022 5
2023 6
2024 5
2025 5
2026 1
Total 465
Download as CSV

Tom R. Tyler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom R. Tyler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 351–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 356 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69 356
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tom R. Tyler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom R. Tyler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 114–115 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 114 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32 114
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1993 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Tom R. Tyler is affiliated with Yale University in the United States and has a research focus primarily within the social sciences. Their scholarly work spans several interrelated subfields, including sociology and political science, law, political science and international relations, artificial intelligence, and social psychology.

Tyler's research topics cover a broad range of areas such as:

  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Deception Detection and Forensic Psychology
  • Law in Society and Culture
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Key publications include recent papers such as:

  • Procedural justice training reduces police use of force and complaints against officers (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Reconciling Police and Communities with Apologies, Acknowledgements, or Both: A Controlled Experiment (2020, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science)
  • Legal socialization during adolescence: The emerging role of school resource officers (2021, Journal of Social Issues)
  • Whither Legitimacy? Legal Authority in the Twenty-First Century (2023, Annual Review of Law and Social Science)
  • Procedural Justice and Self Governance on Twitter (2022, Journal of Online Trust and Safety)

Frequent coauthors in their research include Matthew Katsaros, Tracey L. Meares, Thomas C. O'Brien, Caroline Nobo, and Yael Granot.

Tyler's work has been published repeatedly in venues such as:

  • Journal of Social Issues
  • Journal of Online Trust and Safety
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Social Justice Research
  • Technology Mind and Behavior

In addition to articles, Tyler has authored books published by Edward Elgar Publishing and Cambridge University Press, including:

  • Advanced Introduction to Law and Psychology (2022)
  • Legitimacy-Based Policing and the Promotion of Community Vitality (2022)

Among awards, Tyler was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1993.

Best Publications

  • The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice

    E. Allan Lind;Tom R. Tyler

  • A Relational Model of Authority in Groups

    Tom R. Tyler;E. Allan Lind

  • Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation.

    Tom R. Tyler

  • The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior

    Tom R. Tyler;Steven L. Blader

  • Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement

    Tom R. Tyler;Steven L. Blader

  • Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law

    Tom R. Tyler

  • The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model.

    Tom R. Tyler

  • Enhancing Police Legitimacy

    Tom R. Tyler

  • What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures.

    Tom R. Tyler

  • Beyond Formal Procedures: The Interpersonal Context of Procedural Justice

    Tom R. Tyler;Robert J. Bies

  • Social Justice In A Diverse Society

    Tom R. Tyler;Robert J. Boeckmann;Heather J. Smith;Yuen J. Huo

  • Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice.

    Tom R. Tyler

  • Why do People Comply with the Law? Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions

    Jonathan Jackson;Ben Bradford;Mike Hough;Andy Myhill

  • Self-Interest vs. Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting

    David O. Sears;Richard R. Lau;Tom R. Tyler;Harris M. Allen

  • Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior.

    Steven L. Blader;Tom R. Tyler

  • When Trust Matters: The Moderating Effect of Outcome Favorability

    Joel Brockner;Phyllis A. Siegel;Joseph P. Daly;Tom Tyler

  • PROFILING AND POLICE LEGITIMACY: PROCEDURAL JUSTICE, ATTRIBUTIONS OF MOTIVE, AND ACCEPTANCE OF POLICE AUTHORITY*

    Tom R. Tyler;Cheryl J. Wakslak

  • The Influence of Prior Commitment to an Institution on Reactions to Perceived Unfairness: The Higher They Are, the Harder They Fall

    Joel Brockner;Tom R. Tyler;Rochelle Cooper-Schneider

  • Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model.

    Tom Tyler;Peter Degoey;Heather Smith

  • Social Justice: Outcome and Procedure

    Tom R. Tyler

Frequent Co-Authors

E. Allan Lind
E. Allan Lind Duke University
Jonathan Jackson
Jonathan Jackson London School of Economics and Political Science
Jeffrey Fagan
Jeffrey Fagan Columbia University
Tracey L. Meares
Tracey L. Meares Yale University
John M. Darley
John M. Darley Princeton University
Ben Bradford
Ben Bradford University College London
Aziz Z. Huq
Aziz Z. Huq University of Chicago
David De Cremer
David De Cremer National University of Singapore
Kenneth A. Rasinski
Kenneth A. Rasinski University of Illinois at Chicago
Robert J. MacCoun
Robert J. MacCoun Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a diverse range of online programs and rewarding career pathways. Many students choose to specialize further by becoming Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs). This role focuses on helping individuals develop positive behavioral skills, often in clinical, educational, or community settings.

Education requirements to become a BCBA can vary by state and city. For example, you can learn more about how to become a bcba in North Las Vegas, as well as the steps for becoming a bcba in Oakland. Each location may have unique prerequisites regarding coursework, supervised experience, and exams.

Prospective students should review local requirements, such as Oklahoma City bcba education requirements or the process for how to become a bcba in Omaha. Exploring these options can help you choose the right accredited program and prepare for certification. Psychology students interested in online degrees can benefit from researching specialized tracks that fit their career aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Tom R. Tyler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles