World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
34406
World Ranking
5078
National Ranking
2787

E. Allan Lind publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Allan Lind sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 100 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

E. Allan Lind D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where E. Allan Lind sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

E. Allan Lind is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of social sciences and psychology, with specific focus on subfields such as sociology and political science as well as social psychology.

Their recent scholarly output includes a paper titled Focusing on the "Social" in Social Justice Research, published in 2023 in the journal Social Justice Research. This paper has been cited twice since publication.

Their collaboration network includes frequent coauthorship with Kees van den Bos.

The main research topics addressed by E. Allan Lind include:

  • Psychology of Social Influence
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Cultural Differences and Values

Their work has appeared in the publication venue Social Justice Research, consistent with their recent paper.

Best Publications

  • The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice

    E. Allan Lind;Tom R. Tyler

  • A Relational Model of Authority in Groups

    Tom R. Tyler;E. Allan Lind

  • Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations.

    E. Allan Lind

  • Voice, control, and procedural justice : instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments

    E. Allan Lind;Ruth Kanfer;P. Christopher Earley

  • When fairness works : Toward a general theory of uncertainty management

    E.Allan Lind;Kees van den Bos

  • Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments

    Unknown

  • Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic.

    E. Allan Lind;Carol T. Kulik;Maureen Ambrose;Maria V. de Vera Park

  • How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect

    K. van den Bos;E.A. Lind;Riël Vermunt;H.A.M. Wilke

  • When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority

    K. van den Bos;H.A.M. Wilke;E.A. Lind

  • Superordinate Identification, Subgroup Identification, and Justice Concerns: Is Separatism the Problem; Is Assimilation the Answer?

    Yuen J. Huo;Heather J. Smith;Tom R. Tyler;E. Allan Lind

  • Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of “powerful” and “powerless” speech

    Bonnie Erickson;E.Allan Lind;Bruce C Johnson;William M O'Barr

  • Procedural context and culture : Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments

    E. Allan Lind;Tom R. Tyler;Yuen J. Huo

  • In the Eye of the Beholder: Tort Litigants' Evaluations of Their Experiences in the Civil Justice System

    E. Allan Lind;Robert J. Maccoun;Patricia A. Ebener;William L. F. Felstiner

  • The Power of Language: Presentational Style in the Courtroom

    John M. Conley;William M. O'Barr;E. Allan Lind

  • Evaluating Outcomes by Means of the Fair Process Effect: Evidence for Different Processes in Fairness and Satisfaction Judgments

    K. van den Bos;H.A.M. Wilke;E.A. Lind;Riël Vermunt

  • The Self-Relevant Implications of the Group-Value Model: Group Membership, Self-Worth, and Treatment Quality

    Heather J. Smith;Tom R. Tyler;Yuen J. Huo;Daniel J. Ortiz

  • Cultural values and authority relations: The psychology of conflict resolution across cultures.

    Tom R. Tyler;E. Allan Lind;Yuen J. Huo

  • Procedural justice and participation in task selection: The role of control in mediating justice judgments.

    P. Christopher Earley;E. Allan Lind

  • The Social Construction of Injustice: Fairness Judgments in Response to Own and Others' Unfair Treatment by Authorities

    E.Allan Lind;Laura Kray;Leigh Thompson

  • The Winding Road from Employee to Complainant: Situational and Psychological Determinants of Wrongful-Termination Claims

    E. Allan Lind;Jerald Greenberg;Kimberly S. Scott;Thomas D. Welchans

  • Procedural justice and culture: Effects of culture, gender, and investigator status on procedural preferences.

    Kwok Leung;E. Allan Lind

Frequent Co-Authors

Tom R. Tyler
Tom R. Tyler Yale University
Kees van den Bos
Kees van den Bos Utrecht University
Laura J. Kray
Laura J. Kray University of California, Berkeley
Leigh Thompson
Leigh Thompson Northwestern University
P. Christopher Earley
P. Christopher Earley University of Technology Sydney
Carol T. Kulik
Carol T. Kulik University of South Australia
Sim B. Sitkin
Sim B. Sitkin Duke University
Donald E. Conlon
Donald E. Conlon Michigan State University
Ruth Kanfer
Ruth Kanfer Georgia Institute of Technology
Robert J. MacCoun
Robert J. MacCoun Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in psychology opens the door to diverse online degree options and meaningful professional pathways. Prospective students increasingly seek flexible programs that balance cost, accreditation, and career prospects. Many universities now offer specialized online master's degrees in counseling and related fields, allowing students to study from anywhere without compromising quality.

Affordability is one of the main concerns for aspiring counselors and psychologists. For those exploring options in the southeastern United States, affordable online counseling master's programs in Georgia represent a budget-friendly choice. Students in urban coastal areas can consider the cheapest online counseling master's programs in Los Angeles for maximum value in California.

For those focused on New York, several programs cater to affordability in the metropolitan region. Explore affordable online counseling master's programs in New York City as well as broader options across the state with affordable online counseling master's degrees in New York.

Graduates from these programs can pursue careers in clinical counseling, school psychology, substance abuse treatment, and more. By carefully choosing the right online degree, students can efficiently prepare for licensure and dynamic roles in mental health support.

Best Scientists Citing E. Allan Lind

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles