World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 51 932 869 53 53 186 12598
Psychology 50 5386 5001 313 305 150 12033

Carol T. Kulik publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Carol T. Kulik between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Carol T. Kulik published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2023. 9 of the 231 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2023. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 4 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 4 publications
1970 2025

231 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Carol T. Kulik: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 3
1987 1
1988 4
1989 4
1990 3
1991 5
1992 2
1993 6
1994 5
1995 1
1996 3
1997 4
1998 3
1999 3
2000 2
2001 5
2002 2
2003 3
2004 4
2005 2
2006 5
2007 6
2008 12
2009 9
2010 3
2011 7
2012 14
2013 7
2014 13
2015 12
2016 12
2017 8
2018 6
2019 6
2020 7
2021 8
2022 2
2023 18
2024 5
2025 4
Total 231
Download as CSV

Carol T. Kulik publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carol T. Kulik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 185–189 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 186 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59 186
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Carol T. Kulik D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carol T. Kulik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62 51
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Carol T. Kulik is affiliated with the University of South Australia in Australia. Their research spans the fields of Social Sciences and Business, Management and Accounting, with a specific focus on Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, and Education.

Kulik's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Gender Politics and Representation
  • Organizational Downsizing and Restructuring
  • Diversity and Career in Medicine

Published in a range of academic venues, Kulik's frequent publication outlets include:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Human Resource Management Journal
  • Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
  • Human Resource Management
  • Journal of Management

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Kulik feature the following works:

  • We need a hero: HR and the 'next normal' workplace, 2021, Human Resource Management Journal
  • Gender (in)equality in Australia: good intentions and unintended consequences, 2021, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources

Other notable relevant works from their network include:

  • Skilled Migrants Employed in Developed, Mature Economies: From Newcomers to Organizational Insiders, 2020, Journal of Management
  • The influence of calculative ("hard") and collaborative ("soft") HRM on the layoff-performance relationship in high performance workplaces, 2020, Human Resource Management Journal
  • Rental Insights A COVID-19 Collection, 2020, AHURI Final Report

Kulik has collaborated frequently with several scholars, including:

  • Sanjeewa Samanmali Perera
  • Christina Cregan
  • Sukhbir Sandhu
  • Jill A. Gould
  • Shruti Sardeshmukh

Best Publications

  • Old Friends, New Faces: Motivation Research in the 1990s:

    Maureen L. Ambrose;Carol T. Kulik

  • Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic.

    E. Allan Lind;Carol T. Kulik;Maureen Ambrose;Maria V. de Vera Park

  • Work design as an approach to person-environment fit

    Carol T Kulik;Greg R Oldham;J.Richard Hackman

  • Personal and Situational Determinants of Referent Choice

    Carol T. Kulik;Maureen L. Ambrose

  • THIRD-PARTY REACTIONS TO EMPLOYEE (MIS)TREATMENT: A JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE

    Daniel P. Skarlicki;Carol T. Kulik

  • Board Age and Gender Diversity: A Test of Competing Linear and Curvilinear Predictions

    Muhammad Ali;Yin Lu Ng;Carol T. Kulik

  • Stereotype Threat at Work

    Loriann Roberson;Carol T. Kulik

  • Aging Populations and Management

    Carol T. Kulik;Susan Ryan;Sarah Harper;Gerard George

  • Common Goals and Golden Opportunities: Evaluations of Diversity Education in Academic and Organizational Settings

    Carol T. Kulik;Loriann Roberson

  • Explaining Gender-Based Selection Decisions: A Synthesis Of contextual and Cognitive Approaches

    Elissa L. Perry;Alison Davis-Blake;Carol T. Kulik

  • Relations Between Situational Factors and the Comparative Referents Used by Employees

    Greg R. Oldham;Carol T. Kulik;Lee P. Stepina;Maureen L. Ambrose

  • Relations between job facet comparisons and employee reactions.

    Greg R Oldham;Carol T Kulik;Maureen L Ambrose;Lee P Stepina

  • Moderating effects of personal and contextual factors in age discrimination.

    Elissa L. Perry;Carol T. Kulik;Anne C. Bourhis

  • The gender diversity–performance relationship in services and manufacturing organizations

    Muhammad Ali;Carol T. Kulik;Isabel Metz

  • Known by the Company We Keep: Stigma-By-Association Effects in the Workplace

    Carol T. Kulik;Hugh T. J. Bainbridge;Christina Cregan

  • Influence of social comparisons on perceptions of organizational fairness.

    Maureen L. Ambrose;Lynn K. Harland;Carol T. Kulik

  • Using Needs Assessment to Resolve Controversies in Diversity Training Design

    Loriann Roberson;Carol T. Kulik;Molly B. Pepper

  • The devolution of HR to the line: Implications for perceptions of people management effectiveness

    Elissa L. Perry;Carol T. Kulik

  • Measurement of job characteristics: Comparison of the original and the revised Job Diagnostic Survey

    Carol T. Kulik;Greg R. Oldham;Paul H. Langner

  • Personal and Situational Determinants of Referent Choice

    Unknown

  • Designing effective diversity training: Influence of group composition and trainee experience.

    Loriann Roberson;Carol T. Kulik;Molly B. Pepper

Frequent Co-Authors

Maureen L. Ambrose
Maureen L. Ambrose University of Central Florida
Mara Olekalns
Mara Olekalns University of Melbourne
Greg R. Oldham
Greg R. Oldham Tulane University
E. Allan Lind
E. Allan Lind Duke University
Daniel P. Skarlicki
Daniel P. Skarlicki University of British Columbia
Prashant Bordia
Prashant Bordia Australian National University
Blake E. Ashforth
Blake E. Ashforth Arizona State University
Lyndall Strazdins
Lyndall Strazdins Australian National University
Debra L. Shapiro
Debra L. Shapiro University of Maryland, College Park
J. Richard Hackman
J. Richard Hackman Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in Business and Management in the USA, several online degree paths can help boost your career—even if you need to move quickly. Many students are now opting for the fastest bachelor degree programs, which allow you to complete your studies in less time and join the workforce sooner.

Flexibility and affordability are also top priorities for learners. With a wide range of online business degree programs, students can balance their studies with work commitments and minimize costs. If you're looking to specialize in the rapidly growing healthcare sector, an online healthcare administration degree can provide the skills needed to manage healthcare organizations effectively.

For those aspiring to higher leadership roles, there are also affordable online mha programs designed to equip students with advanced management and administrative knowledge specific to healthcare.

Whether you want to advance quickly, save on tuition, or specialize in a growing field, these online pathways offer flexible options to match your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Carol T. Kulik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles