World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 32 7293 6778 518 499 122 4875

Mara Olekalns publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mara Olekalns between 1991 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mara Olekalns published across 34 years, from 1991 to 2024, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2020. 3 of the 124 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2020. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications
1991 2024

124 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mara Olekalns: publications per year, 1991 to 2024
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 2
1995 0
1996 2
1997 2
1998 1
1999 3
2000 1
2001 4
2002 5
2003 4
2004 5
2005 6
2006 2
2007 9
2008 5
2009 3
2010 5
2011 8
2012 6
2013 7
2014 5
2015 7
2016 2
2017 3
2018 2
2019 5
2020 11
2021 4
2022 1
2023 1
2024 2
Total 124
Download as CSV

Mara Olekalns publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mara Olekalns sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 122 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 122
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Mara Olekalns D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mara Olekalns sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222 32
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Mara Olekalns is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia and has contributed extensively to the fields of social sciences, psychology, and business management. Their research spans a variety of interconnected domains, particularly focusing on conflict management and negotiation, gender diversity and inequality, family business performance and succession, attachment and relationship dynamics, emotions and moral behavior, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, as well as language, discourse, and communication strategies.

Their work has been published in several notable academic journals, including:

  • Negotiation Journal
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • Organizational Psychology Review
  • International Journal of Conflict Management
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Recent publications authored by Mara Olekalns include:

  • Resetting relationship trajectories: A reconceptualization of the relationship repair process (2024), Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • Nine Lessons from Love: Couples Therapy for Negotiators (2022), Negotiation Journal
  • Cognitive processing and affect predict negotiators' post-adversity subjective and economic outcomes (2021), International Journal of Conflict Management

Some of the work associated with their frequent coauthors includes collaboration with Liu-Qin Yang, Brianna Barker Caza, Philip L. Smith, Catherine S. Daus, and Ray Friedman. These collaborations suggest a network of scholarly interaction clustered around negotiation, organizational behavior, and psychological dimensions of social science research.

Mara Olekalns has also contributed to academic knowledge through book chapters, notably in Cambridge University Press publications. One recorded book title is The Cambridge Handbook of Workplace Affect (2020), which has received citations in its field.

Their research integrates multiple subfields, including sociology and political science, social psychology, organizational behavior, human resource management, gender studies, and language and linguistics. This multidisciplinary approach is reflected in the diversity of topics their work addresses.

Best Publications

  • Affectivity, Organizational Stressors, and Absenteeism: A Causal Model of Burnout and Its Consequences

    Roderick D. Iverson;Mara Olekalns;Peter J. Erwin

  • The positive and negative effects of anger on dispute resolution: evidence from electronically mediated disputes.

    Ray Friedman;Cameron Anderson;Jeanne Brett;Mara Olekalns

  • Organisational Behaviour on the Pacific Rim

    Steven Lattimore McShane;Mara Olekalns;Tony Travaglione

  • Sticks And Stones: Language, Face, And Online Dispute Resolution

    Jeanne M. Brett;Mara Olekalns;Ray Friedman;Nathan Goates

  • The process of negotiating: Strategy and timing as predictors of outcomes.

    Mara Olekalns;Philip L. Smith;Therese Walsh

  • Conflicting social motives in negotiating groups.

    Laurie R. Weingart;Jeanne M. Brett;Mara Olekalns;Philip L. Smith

  • Mutually Dependent: Power, Trust, Affect And The Use Of Deception In Negotiation

    Mara Olekalns;Philip L. Smith

  • Understanding Optimal Outcomes: The Role of Strategy Sequences in Competitive Negotiations.

    Mara Olekalns;Philip L. Smith

  • Quantitative Coding of Negotiation Behavior

    Laurie Weingart;Philip Smith;Mara Olekalns

  • PHASES, TRANSITIONS AND INTERRUPTIONS: MODELING PROCESSES IN MULTI‐PARTY NEGOTIATIONS

    Mara Olekalns;Jeanne M. Brett;Laurie R. Weingart

  • Testing the relationships among negotiators’ motivational orientations, strategy choices, and outcomes

    Mara Olekalns;Philip L Smith

  • Emotions in Negotiation

    Daniel Druckman;Daniel Druckman;Mara Olekalns

  • Social Value Orientations and Strategy Choices in Competitive Negotiations

    Mara Olekalns;Philip L. Smith

  • Negotiating the Gender Divide: Lessons From the Negotiation and Organizational Behavior Literatures

    Carol T. Kulik;Mara Olekalns

  • Moments in Time: Metacognition, Trust, and Outcomes in Dyadic Negotiations

    Mara Olekalns;Philip L. Smith

  • Loose with the Truth: Predicting Deception in Negotiation

    Mara Olekalns;Philip L. Smith

  • Interpretive filters: social cognition and the impact of turning points in negotiation

    Daniel Druckman;Mara Olekalns;Philip L. Smith

  • SOCIAL MOTIVES IN NEGOTIATION: THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DYAD COMPOSITION, NEGOTIATION PROCESSES AND OUTCOMES

    Mara Olekalns;Philip L. Smith

  • With Feeling: How Emotions Shape Negotiation: Emotion in Negotiation

    Mara Olekalns;Daniel Druckman

  • With Feeling: How Emotions Shape Negotiation

    Mara Olekalns;Daniel Druckman;Daniel Druckman

  • The Positive and Negative Effects of Anger on Dispute Resolution: Evidence from Electronically Mediated Disputes

    Ray Friedman;Jeanne M. Brett;Cameron Anderson;Mara Olekalns

  • Handbook of Research on Negotiation

    Mara Olekalns;Wendi L. Adair

Frequent Co-Authors

Laurie R. Weingart
Laurie R. Weingart Carnegie Mellon University
Ray Friedman
Ray Friedman Vanderbilt University
Jeanne M. Brett
Jeanne M. Brett Northwestern University
Daniel Druckman
Daniel Druckman George Mason University
Carol T. Kulik
Carol T. Kulik University of South Australia
Cameron Anderson
Cameron Anderson University of California, Berkeley
Linda L. Putnam
Linda L. Putnam University of California, Santa Barbara
Carsten K. W. De Dreu
Carsten K. W. De Dreu University of Groningen
Debra L. Shapiro
Debra L. Shapiro University of Maryland, College Park
Lea Waters
Lea Waters University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Social Sciences or Humanities offers diverse career opportunities. Today, many students opt for flexible online options that suit their schedules and budgets. affordable msw programs online are popular with individuals seeking careers in social work, while those interested in behavior analysis may consider a bcba degree online for roles in educational and clinical settings.

For students who wish to complete their degree sooner, fastest msw program options offer flexible, intensive formats. Similarly, students intrigued by psychology and eager to join the workforce quickly may explore an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree.

As you consider your pathway, think about your long-term goals, accreditation, program format, and costs. Online degrees can help you balance work, life, and study while preparing you for meaningful careers in education, counseling, therapy, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Mara Olekalns

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles