World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Carlo Laj publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carlo Laj sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Carlo Laj D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carlo Laj sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 1996 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Paleontology
  • Sedimentary rock
  • Geophysics

Earth's magnetic field, Paleontology, Paleomagnetism, Geophysics and Radiocarbon dating are his primary areas of study. His research in Earth's magnetic field intersects with topics in Climatology, Ice core, Pleistocene and Absolute dating. He has included themes like Laschamp event and Paleointensity in his Paleontology study.

His study focuses on the intersection of Paleomagnetism and fields such as Seismology with connections in the field of Clockwise, Lithology and Neogene. In the field of Geophysics, his study on Magnetostratigraphy overlaps with subjects such as Geomagnetic excursion. His Radiocarbon dating study combines topics in areas such as Magnetic dipole and Oceanography, Holocene.

His most cited work include:

  • The Tertiary geodynamical evolution of the Aegean arc: a paleomagnetic reconstruction (320 citations)
  • Correlation of marine 14C ages from the nordic seas with the GISP2 isotope record : Implications for 14C calibration beyond 25 ka BP (296 citations)
  • Geomagnetic reversal paths (294 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Paleomagnetism, Paleontology, Earth's magnetic field, Geophysics and Seismology. The Paleomagnetism study combines topics in areas such as Geomagnetic reversal, Tectonics, Sedimentary rock, Neogene and Clockwise. His work deals with themes such as Cenozoic and Paleogene, which intersect with Clockwise.

His Paleontology study deals with Oceanography intersecting with Sediment. His Earth's magnetic field research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Volcano and Ice core. His research integrates issues of Natural remanent magnetization, Magnetization, Remanence and Geomagnetic pole in his study of Geophysics.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Paleomagnetism (36.70%)
  • Paleontology (34.04%)
  • Earth's magnetic field (30.32%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2017)?

  • Paleontology (34.04%)
  • Oceanography (15.96%)
  • Sediment core (6.91%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Carlo Laj mostly deals with Paleontology, Oceanography, Sediment core, Volcano and Earth's magnetic field. His work in Paleomagnetism and Radiocarbon dating is related to Paleontology. His study in Paleomagnetism is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Seismology, Paleointensity, Stack and Indian ocean.

His Oceanography study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Structural basin and Sediment. His Volcano research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Stratigraphy and Physical geography. His work carried out in the field of Earth's magnetic field brings together such families of science as Period, Geophysics and Variation.

Between 2012 and 2017, his most popular works were:

  • Links between tropical rainfall and North Atlantic climate during the last glacial period (200 citations)
  • High resolution global paleointensity stack since 75 kyr (GLOPIS-75) calibrated to absolute values (126 citations)
  • Dynamics of the earth magnetic field in the 10-75 kyr period comprising the Laschamp and Mono Lake excursions: New results from the French Chaîne des Puys in a global perspective (62 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Paleontology
  • Sedimentary rock
  • Plate tectonics

Carlo Laj spends much of his time researching Paleontology, Volcano, Paleomagnetism, Seismology and Jaramillo reversal. Carlo Laj combines subjects such as Environmental change, Inlet and Indian ocean with his study of Paleontology. His Volcano research integrates issues from Holocene, Sediment and Facies.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Paleointensity, Stack and Physical geography. His Seismology study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Geomagnetic reversal and Earth's magnetic field. In his works, Carlo Laj conducts interdisciplinary research on Earth's magnetic field and Excursion.

Best Publications

  • Magnetic Anomalies Over Oceanic Ridges

    F. J. Vine;D. H. Matthews

  • Links between tropical rainfall and North Atlantic climate during the last glacial period

    Gaudenz Deplazes;Andreas Lückge;Larry C. Peterson;Axel Timmermann

  • The Tertiary geodynamical evolution of the Aegean arc: a paleomagnetic reconstruction

    Catherine Kissel;Carlo Laj

  • Correlation of marine 14C ages from the nordic seas with the GISP2 isotope record : Implications for 14C calibration beyond 25 ka BP

    Antje H. L. Voelker;Michael Sarnthein;Pieter M. Grootes;Helmut Erlenkeuser

  • Geomagnetic reversal paths

    Carlo Laj;Alain Mazaud;Robin Weeks;Michael Fuller

  • Reduced North Atlantic Deep Water Coeval with the Glacial Lake Agassiz Freshwater Outburst

    Helga Kikki Flesche Kleiven;Helga Kikki Flesche Kleiven;Catherine Kissel;Carlo Laj;Ulysses S Ninnemann;Ulysses S Ninnemann

  • Improvements in long‐core measurement techniques: applications in palaeomagnetism and palaeoceanography

    Robin Weeks;Carlo Laj;Lionel Endignoux;Michael Fuller

  • Changes in the carbon cycle during the last deglaciation as indicated by the comparison of 10Be and 14C records

    Raimund Muscheler;Jürg Beer;Gerhard Wagner;Carlo Laj

  • Presence of the solar de Vries cycle (~205 years) during the last ice age

    Gerhard Wagner;Jürg Beer;Jozef Masarik;Raimund Muscheler

  • High resolution global paleointensity stack since 75 kyr (GLOPIS-75) calibrated to absolute values

    Carlo Laj;Catherine Kissel;Juerg Beer

  • On the age of the Laschamp geomagnetic excursion

    Hervé Guillou;Brad S. Singer;Carlo Laj;Catherine Kissel

  • Rapid climatic variations during marine isotopic stage 3: magnetic analysis of sediments from Nordic Seas and North Atlantic

    C. Kissel;C. Laj;L. Labeyrie;T. Dokken

  • First paleomagnetic results from Mio-Pliocene series of the hellenic sedimentary ARC

    C. Laj;M. Jamet;M. Jamet;D. Sorel;J.P. Valente

  • Magnetic fabric in “undeformed” marine clays from compressional zones

    Catherine Kissel;Eric Barrier;Carlo Laj;Teh-Quei Lee

  • High-resolution record of the Upper Olduvai transition from Po Valley (Italy) sediments: support for dipolar transition geometry?

    Emmanuel Tric;Carlo Laj;Célestine Jéhanno;Jean-Pierre Valet

  • South Atlantic and North Atlantic geomagnetic paleointensity stacks (0-80 ka): implications for inter-hemispheric correlation

    J.S Stoner;C Laj;J.E.T Channell;C Kissel

  • Geomagnetic intensity and 14C abundance in the atmosphere and ocean during the past 50 kyr

    Carlo Laj;Alain Mazaud;Jean‐Claude Duplessy

  • Geomagnetic field control of 14C production over the last 80 Ky: Implications for the radiocarbon time-scale

    A. Mazaud;C. Laj;E. Bard;M. Arnold

  • The Blake Geomagnetic Polarity Episode recorded in Chinese loess

    R. X. Zhu;L. P. Zhou;C. Laj;A. Mazaud

  • Holocene history of the Larsen-A Ice Shelf constrained by geomagnetic paleointensity dating

    Stefanie Brachfeld;Eugene Domack;Catherine Kissel;Carlo Laj

  • Chlorine-36 evidence for the Mono Lake event in the Summit GRIP ice core

    G. Wagner;J. Beer;C. Laj;C. Kissel

Frequent Co-Authors

Catherine Kissel
Catherine Kissel Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University
Alain Mazaud
Alain Mazaud Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement
Hervé Guillou
Hervé Guillou Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean-Pierre Valet
Jean-Pierre Valet Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
Axel Timmermann
Axel Timmermann Pusan National University
Sébastien Nomade
Sébastien Nomade Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University
Konrad A Hughen
Konrad A Hughen Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Juan Carlos Carracedo
Juan Carlos Carracedo Spanish National Research Council
Daniel M. Sigman
Daniel M. Sigman Princeton University
Mark A. Cane
Mark A. Cane Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Earth Science opens doors to diverse career opportunities, but pairing it with complementary online programs can enhance your skills and job prospects. For veterans interested in expanding their academic qualifications, programs like the online spanish bachelor degree for veterans offer a unique blend of language skills that can be valuable in global environmental research and communication.

Creative professionals who wish to incorporate artistic perspectives into their scientific work might explore the best online mfa programs. These programs foster innovation and broaden the scope of Earth Science applications, especially in education and outreach.

For those aiming to transition into leadership roles, a specialized business approach is crucial. The best online human resource management masters degree programs provide essential management skills that can enhance career advancement within environmental organizations.

Additionally, learners at different life stages can benefit from flexible study options like one year degree programs for seniors. These accelerated paths offer a rapid but comprehensive way to enter or pivot within Earth Science careers.

Best Scientists Citing Carlo Laj

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles