World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
54
Citations
7806
World Ranking
1746
National Ranking
50

Antonio Blanco publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Blanco sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 205 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Antonio Blanco D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Blanco sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • DNA
  • Genetics

His primary scientific interests are in Genetics, Botany, Quantitative trait locus, Cultivar and Genetic marker. Genetics is closely attributed to Poaceae in his work. His Botany study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Genetic variation and Amplified fragment length polymorphism.

His Quantitative trait locus research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Chromosome regions, Population genetics, Allele and Agronomy. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Food science and Cyanidin, Antioxidant. The Genetic marker study combines topics in areas such as Restriction fragment length polymorphism and Gene mapping.

His most cited work include:

  • A high‐density, SNP‐based consensus map of tetraploid wheat as a bridge to integrate durum and bread wheat genomics and breeding (181 citations)
  • A genetic linkage map of durum wheat (128 citations)
  • A high-density consensus map of A and B wheat genomes (96 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Antonio Blanco mostly deals with Genetics, Botany, Gene, Quantitative trait locus and Cultivar. Genome, Chromosome, Genetic linkage, Genetic marker and Gene mapping are among the areas of Genetics where Antonio Blanco concentrates his study. Antonio Blanco has included themes like Amplified fragment length polymorphism, Genetic diversity and Introgression in his Botany study.

His research investigates the connection between Gene and topics such as Powdery mildew that intersect with issues in Blumeria graminis. The concepts of his Quantitative trait locus study are interwoven with issues in Chromosome regions, Genetic variability, Allele, Inbred strain and Candidate gene. His Cultivar research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Microsatellite, Genotype and Olea.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Genetics (41.38%)
  • Botany (27.59%)
  • Gene (25.29%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?

  • Genetics (41.38%)
  • Quantitative trait locus (25.29%)
  • Gene (25.29%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Genetics, Quantitative trait locus, Gene, Candidate gene and Botany. His study involves Single-nucleotide polymorphism, Genome, Allele, Stem rust and TILLING, a branch of Genetics. His research in Quantitative trait locus intersects with topics in Chromosome regions, Chromosome, Genome-wide association study, Association mapping and Inbred strain.

His study looks at the intersection of Gene and topics like Carotenoid with Gene isoform, Arabidopsis thaliana, Molecular breeding and Antioxidant. In Candidate gene, he works on issues like Genetic variability, which are connected to Genetic variation, Common wheat and Phenolic acid. His Botany research integrates issues from Vitis International Variety Catalogue and Phylogenetic tree.

Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • A high‐density, SNP‐based consensus map of tetraploid wheat as a bridge to integrate durum and bread wheat genomics and breeding (181 citations)
  • Physical Mapping of Bread Wheat Chromosome 5A: An Integrated Approach (85 citations)
  • Production and characterization of functional biscuits obtained from purple wheat (70 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • DNA
  • Genetics

Antonio Blanco focuses on Quantitative trait locus, Genetics, Candidate gene, Agronomy and Gene. His Quantitative trait locus research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Endosperm, Chromosome, Genome-wide association study and Inbred strain. His Candidate gene research includes elements of Genetic variability, Phytoene synthase, Grain quality and Marker-assisted selection.

His study in Agronomy focuses on Cultivar in particular. His Gene research focuses on Genotype in particular. His work focuses on many connections between Human nutrition and other disciplines, such as Botany, that overlap with his field of interest in Food science.

Best Publications

  • A high‐density, SNP‐based consensus map of tetraploid wheat as a bridge to integrate durum and bread wheat genomics and breeding

    Marco Maccaferri;Andrea Ricci;Silvio Salvi;Sara Giulia Milner

  • A genetic linkage map of durum wheat

    A. Blanco;M. P. Bellomo;A. Cenci;C. De Giovanni

  • Relationships between grain protein content and grain yield components through quantitative trait locus analyses in a recombinant inbred line population derived from two elite durum wheat cultivars

    A. Blanco;G. Mangini;A. Giancaspro;S. Giove

  • Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Tetraploid Wheats (Triticum turgidum L.) Estimated by SSR, DArT and Pedigree Data.

    Giovanni Laidò;Giacomo Mangini;Francesca Taranto;Agata Gadaleta

  • Detection of QTLs for grain protein content in durum wheat

    A. Blanco;R. Simeone;A. Gadaleta

  • Production and characterization of functional biscuits obtained from purple wheat

    Antonella Pasqualone;Anna Maria Bianco;Vito Michele Paradiso;Carmine Summo

  • Molecular mapping of the novel powdery mildew resistance gene Pm36 introgressed from Triticum turgidum var. dicoccoides in durum wheat

    Antonio Blanco;A. Gadaleta;A. Cenci;A. V. Carluccio

  • Detection of grain protein content QTLs across environments in tetraploid wheats.

    Antonio Blanco;Antonella Pasqualone;A. Troccoli;N. Di Fonzo

  • A high-density consensus map of A and B wheat genomes

    Daniela Marone;Giovanni Laidò;Agata Gadaleta;Pasqualina Colasuonno

  • Genetic variability in yellow pigment components in cultivated and wild tetraploid wheats

    A.M. Digesù;C. Platani;L. Cattivelli;G. Mangini

  • Quantitative trait loci influencing grain protein content in tetraploid wheats

    A. Blanco;C. de Giovanni;B. Laddomada;A. Sciancalepore

  • Integration of dinucleotide microsatellites from hexaploid bread wheat into a genetic linkage map of durum wheat

    V. Korzun;M. S. Röder;K. Wendehake;A. Pasqualone

  • Essential oils, genetic relationships and in vitro establishment of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don ssp. italicum from wild Mediterranean germplasm

    I. Morone-Fortunato;C. Montemurro;C. Ruta;R. Perrini

  • Genetic basis of qualitative and quantitative resistance to powdery mildew in wheat: from consensus regions to candidate genes

    Daniela Marone;María A. Russo;Giovanni Laidò;Pasquale de Vita

  • Quantitative trait loci for yellow pigment concentration and individual carotenoid compounds in durum wheat

    Antonio Blanco;Pasqualina Colasuonno;Agata Gadaleta;Giacomo Mangini

  • Callus induction and shoot regeneration in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)

    B. Greco;O.A. Tanzarella;G. Carrozzo;A. Blanco

  • Effectiveness of microsatellite DNA markers in checking the identity of protected designation of origin extra virgin olive oil.

    Antonella Pasqualone;Cinzia Montemurro;Carmine Summo;Wilma Sabetta

  • Physical Mapping of Bread Wheat Chromosome 5A: An Integrated Approach

    Delfina Barabaschi;Federica Magni;Andrea Volante;Agata Gadaleta

  • Cell wall traits as potential resources to improve resistance of durum wheat against Fusarium graminearum

    Vincenzo Lionetti;Angelica Giancaspro;Eleonora Fabri;Stefania L Giove

  • Genetic and physical mapping of new EST-derived SSRs on the A and B genome chromosomes of wheat.

    A. Gadaleta;A. Giancaspro;S. L. Giove;S. Zacheo

  • Phosphomannose isomerase, pmi, as a selectable marker gene for durum wheat transformation

    A. Gadaleta;A. Giancaspro;A. Blechl;A. Blanco

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonella Pasqualone
Antonella Pasqualone University of Bari Aldo Moro
Luigi Cattivelli
Luigi Cattivelli The Canadian Real Estate Association
Anna M. Mastrangelo
Anna M. Mastrangelo Agricultural Research Council
Diego Rubiales
Diego Rubiales Spanish National Research Council
Roberto Papa
Roberto Papa Marche Polytechnic University
Nicola Pecchioni
Nicola Pecchioni The Canadian Real Estate Association
Francesco Caponio
Francesco Caponio University of Bari Aldo Moro
Giampiero Valè
Giampiero Valè The Canadian Real Estate Association
Roberto Tuberosa
Roberto Tuberosa University of Bologna
Rosa Rao
Rosa Rao University of Naples Federico II

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Antonio Blanco

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles