World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
37
Citations
8757
World Ranking
6136
National Ranking
2935

Ray Friedman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray Friedman sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 133 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Ray Friedman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray Friedman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ray Friedman is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology, with a total of seven publications primarily focused on social psychology, sociology and political science, clinical psychology, general health professions, and management science and operations research.

The main topics explored in Friedman's research include social and intergroup psychology, cultural differences and values, emotions and moral behavior, personality traits and psychology, bullying, victimization and aggression, health policy implementation science, and evaluation and performance assessment.

The notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Friedman are:

  • Science, Stories, and Impact: A Response to Zhang and Chen, 2024, Management and Organization Review
  • An Application of Large Language Models to Coding Negotiation Transcripts, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Not Your Garden (Hose) Variety Emotion: An Integrative Review of the Flows of Anger and a Path Forward, 2024, Academy of Management Annals
  • From shared climate to personal ecosystems: Why some people create unique environments, 2021, Organizational Psychology Review
  • Implicit Theories of Negotiation: Developing a Measure of Agreement Fluidity, 2020, SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)

Friedman has frequently published in the following venues:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings (2 publications)
  • Academy of Management Annals (1 publication)
  • Management and Organization Review (1 publication)
  • Organizational Psychology Review (1 publication)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (1 publication)

Collaborations form an important aspect of Friedman's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Robin L. Pinkley (3 joint publications)
  • Ming-Jie Tsai (3 joint publications)
  • Mara Olekalns (2 joint publications)
  • Michele J. Gelfand (2 joint publications)
  • Shu-Cheng Chi (2 joint publications)

Best Publications

  • WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND: THE IMPACT OF PERSONAL CONFLICT STYLE ON WORK CONFLICT AND STRESS

    Raymond A. Friedman;Simon T. Tidd;Steven C. Currall;James C. Tsai

  • Differentiation of Boundary Spanning Roles: Labor Negotiations and Implications for Role Conflict.

    Raymond A. Friedman;Joel Podolny

  • Bargainer characteristics in distributive and integrative negotiation.

    Bruce Barry;Raymond A. Friedman

  • “Dirty hands” versus “clean models”

    Paul Hirsch;Stuart Michaels;Ray Friedman

  • Racial differences in sensitivity to behavioral integrity: attitudinal consequences, in-group effects, and "trickle down" among Black and non-Black employees.

    Tony L. Simons;Ray Friedman;Leigh Anne Liu;Judi McLean Parks

  • Conflict Escalation: Dispute Exacerbating Elements of E-mail Communication

    Raymond A. Friedman;Steven C. Currall

  • The positive and negative effects of anger on dispute resolution: evidence from electronically mediated disputes.

    Ray Friedman;Cameron Anderson;Jeanne Brett;Mara Olekalns

  • The Obama Effect : How a salient role model reduces race-based performance differences

    David M. Marx;Sei Jin Ko;Ray A. Friedman

  • Supervisor–Subordinate Guanxi: Developing a Three-Dimensional Model and Scale

    Ying Chen;Ray Friedman;Enhai Yu;Weihua Fang

  • An expectancy model of Chinese-American differences in conflict-avoiding

    Ray Friedman;Shu-Cheng Chi;Leigh Anne Liu

  • BACKLASH TOWARD DIVERSITY INITIATIVES: EXAMINING THE IMPACT OF DIVERSITY PROGRAM JUSTIFICATION, PERSONAL AND GROUP OUTCOMES

    Deborah L. Kidder;Melenie J. Lankau;Donna Chrobot‐Mason;Kelly A. Mollica

  • Sticks And Stones: Language, Face, And Online Dispute Resolution

    Jeanne M. Brett;Mara Olekalns;Ray Friedman;Nathan Goates

  • Social Capital and Career Mobility A Structural Theory of Lower Returns to Education for Asian Employees

    Raymond A. Friedman;David Krackhardt

  • Social Support and Career Optimism: Examining the Effectiveness of Network Groups Among Black Managers

    Ray Friedman;Melinda Kane;Daniel B. Cornfield

  • The effects of network groups on minority employee turnover intentions

    Raymond A. Friedman;Brooks Holtom

  • THE IMPORTANCE OF ROLE AMBIGUITY AND TRUST IN CONFLICT PERCEPTION: UNPACKING THE TASK CONFLICT TO RELATIONSHIP CONFLICT LINKAGE

    Simon T. Tidd;Heather H. McIntyre;Raymond A. Friedman

  • Examining the positive and negative effects of guanxi practices: A multi-level analysis of guanxi practices and procedural justice perceptions

    Ying Chen;Ray Friedman;Enhai Yu;Fubin Sun

  • When Excuses Don't Work: The Persistent Injustice Effect among Black Managers

    Martin Davidson;Raymond A. Friedman

  • Front Stage, Backstage: The Dramatic Structure of Labor Negotiations

    Raymond A. Friedman

  • The Dynamics of Consensus Building in Intracultural and Intercultural Negotiations

    Leigh Anne Liu;Ray Friedman;Bruce Barry;Michele J. Gelfand

  • Racial Differences in Sensitivity to Behavioral Integrity: Attitudal Consequences, In-Group Effects and Trickle Down among Black and Non-Black Employees

    Tony L. Simons;Ray Friedman;Leigh Anne Liu;Judi McLean Parks

  • The Positive and Negative Effects of Anger on Dispute Resolution: Evidence from Electronically Mediated Disputes

    Ray Friedman;Jeanne M. Brett;Cameron Anderson;Mara Olekalns

  • Union-Management conflict: Historical trends and new directions

    Ray Friedman;Larry Hunter;Ying Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeanne M. Brett
Jeanne M. Brett Northwestern University
Mara Olekalns
Mara Olekalns University of Melbourne
Ying-yi Hong
Ying-yi Hong Chinese University of Hong Kong
Tony Simons
Tony Simons Cornell University
Michele J. Gelfand
Michele J. Gelfand Stanford University
Cameron Anderson
Cameron Anderson University of California, Berkeley
Joel M. Podolny
Joel M. Podolny Apple (United States)
Brooks C. Holtom
Brooks C. Holtom Georgetown University
Debra L. Shapiro
Debra L. Shapiro University of Maryland, College Park
David Krackhardt
David Krackhardt Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options in Social Sciences and Humanities provides flexible and affordable routes to advance your career. For students seeking a quick transition to the workforce or a fast-paced academic challenge, programs like 1 year masters degrees can be ideal. These intensive programs allow you to complete advanced studies in just 12 months, saving both time and tuition costs.

If you are starting your undergraduate journey, consider an accelerated bachelor's degree online accredited program. These options let motivated learners earn their degree faster than traditional timelines while maintaining high academic standards.

For those interested in counseling, social work, or behavioral analysis, affordability and program quality are major considerations. You can find cheap online msw programs that have been ranked for quality and value, allowing career changers or busy professionals to gain essential licensure and skills.

Additionally, pursuing bcba programs online is a strategic path for students seeking roles in applied behavior analysis. These accredited programs fit around work schedules while preparing you for high-demand, impactful careers that make a difference in people’s lives.

Best Scientists Citing Ray Friedman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles